• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Pereiti į pagrindinį turinį
  • Skip to footer
Europos lyčių lygybės institutas logoEuropos lyčių lygybės institutas
Paieška

Paieškos forma

Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • À qui s’adresse cette boîte à outils?
        • Pourquoi la budgétisation sensible au genre des Fonds de l’UE relevant de la gestion partagée est-elle importante?
          • Trois raisons pour lesquelles la budgétisation sensible au genre est essentielle dans les Fonds de l’UE
        • Qu’est-ce que la budgétisation sensible au genre?
          • Présentation de la budgétisation sensible au genre
          • En quoi la budgétisation sensible au genre est-elle liée aux réalités vécues par les femmes et les hommes?
          • En quoi consiste la budgétisation sensible au genre dans la pratique
          • Budgétisation sensible au genre des Fonds de l’UE
            • La budgétisation sensible au genre comme moyen de se conformer aux exigences juridiques de l’UE
            • La budgétisation sensible au genre comme moyen de promouvoir la responsabilité et la transparence dans la planification et la gestion des finances publiques
            • La budgétisation sensible au genre comme moyen d’accroître la participation des femmes et des hommes aux processus budgétaires
            • La budgétisation sensible au genre comme moyen de favoriser l’égalité de genre pour les femmes et les hommes dans toute leur diversité
        • Comment pouvons-nous appliquer la budgétisation sensible au genre des Fonds de l’UE relevant de la gestion partagée? Outils pratiques et exemples des États membres
          • Outil 1 — Relier les Fonds de l’UE au cadre réglementaire de l’UE en matière d’égalité de genre
            • Base législative et réglementaire des politiques de l’UE en matière d’égalité de genre
            • Exigences concrètes pour la prise en considération de l’égalité de genre dans les Fonds de l’UE
            • Conditions favorisantes des Fonds de l’UE
            • Autres ressources
          • Outil 2 — Analyser les inégalités de genre et les besoins liés au genre aux niveaux national et infranational
            • Étapes concernant l’évaluation et l’analyse des inégalités de genre et les besoins liés au genre
            • Étape 1 — Recueillir des informations et des données ventilées sur le groupe cible
            • Étape 2 — Recenser les inégalités de genre existantes et leurs causes sous-jacentes
            • Étape 3 — Consulter directement les groupes cibles
            • Étape 4 — Tirer des conclusions
            • Autres ressources
          • Outil 3 — Mettre en œuvre l’égalité de genre dans les objectifs politiques (dans les accords de partenariat) et les objectifs/mesures spécifiques (dans les programmes opérationnels)
            • Étapes de la mise en œuvre opérationnelle de l’égalité de genre dans les accords de partenariat et les programmes opérationnels
            • Orientations générales sur la mise en œuvre de l’égalité de genre lors de l’élaboration d’objectifs stratégiques, d’objectifs spécifiques et de mesures
            • Liste de contrôle pour la mise en pratique du principe horizontal de l’égalité de genre dans les accords de partenariat
            • Liste de contrôle pour la mise en pratique du principe horizontal de l’égalité de genre dans les programmes opérationnels
            • Exemples d’intégration de l’égalité de genre en tant que principe horizontal dans les objectifs stratégiques et les objectifs spécifiques
          • Outil 4 — Coordination et complémentarités entre les Fonds de l’UE pour favoriser l’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et vie privée
            • Étapes à suivre pour améliorer la coordination et la complémentarité entre les Fonds
            • Étape 1 — Alignement sur les objectifs de l’engagement stratégique pour l’égalité de genre
            • Étapes 2 et 3 — Recenser et élaborer d’éventuelles interventions en faveur de l’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et vie privée
            • Étape 4 — Suivi à l’aide d’indicateurs au sein des systèmes de suivi et d’évaluation
            • Étude de cas fictive 1 — Concilier travail rémunéré et garde d’enfants
            • Étude de cas fictive 2 — Concilier travail posté et garde d’enfants
            • Étude de cas fictive 3 — Équilibrer les soins pour soi-même et pour les autres
            • Étude de cas fictive 4 — Concilier la garde des enfants et des personnes âgées avec le travail posté
            • Autres ressources
          • Outil 5 — Définir les partenariats et la gouvernance à plusieurs niveaux — Identifier les partenaires pertinents, le rôle des experts sur les questions de genre et la composition des comités de suivi
            • Étapes pour la définition des partenariats et de la gouvernance à plusieurs niveaux
            • Autres ressources
          • Outil 6 — Élaborer des indicateurs quantitatifs et qualitatifs pour faire progresser l’égalité de genre
            • Étapes pour l’élaboration d’indicateurs quantitatifs et qualitatifs
            • FEDER et Fonds de cohésion (mêmes indicateurs communs)
            • Fonds social européen plus
            • Fonds européen pour les affaires maritimes et la pêche
            • Autres ressources
          • Outil 7 — Définir des critères de sélection de projets sensibles au genre
            • Étapes à suivre pour favoriser l’élaboration et la sélection de projets sensibles à la dimension de genre
            • Liste de contrôle pour guider la préparation des appels à propositions de projets
            • Liste de contrôle pour les critères de sélection des projets
            • Outil complémentaire 7.a — Conventions tenant compte de la dimension de genre avec les personnes responsables de l’exécution des projets
          • Outil 8 — Contrôler les allocations de ressources en faveur de l’égalité de genre dans les Fonds de l’UE
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Outil 9 — Intégrer l’égalité de genre dans la conception des projets
            • Étapes pour intégrer l’égalité de genre dans la conception des projets
            • Étape 1 — Alignement sur les objectifs et indicateurs en matière de genre des accords de partenariat et des programmes opérationnels
            • Étape 2 — Élaboration et demande de projet
            • Étape 3 — Mise en œuvre du projet
            • Étape 4 — Évaluation du projet
          • Outil 10 — Intégrer une perspective de genre dans les processus de suivi et d’évaluation
            • Étapes pour intégrer une perspective de genre dans les processus de S & E
            • Autres ressources
          • Outil 11 — Rendre compte des dépenses de ressources en faveur de l’égalité de genre dans les Fonds de l’UE
            • Suivi des dépenses pour l’égalité de genre
            • Autres ressources
          • Références
          • Abréviations
          • Remerciements
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
  • Pirmas
  • EIGE’s publications
  • EIGE-2021 Gender Equality Index 2021 Report: Health
  • Thematic focus
  • Gender inequalities in health in the European Union
  • Gender differences in health reflect lifelong inequalities

EIGE-2021 Gender Equality Index 2021 Report: Health

PrintDownload as PDF
  • Back to toolkit page
  • Foreword
  • Highlights
  • Thematic focus: health
  • Introduction
  • Gender equality in the European Union at a glance
    • Progress is an uphill struggle
    • Decision-making driving change, segregation blocking it
    • Small drop in disparities in gender equality across the European Union, but COVID-19 could change that
  • Domain of work
    • Fragile pace of change since 2010
    • Unpaid childcare still hindering women from working full time
    • Women bear the brunt of the impact of COVID-19 on jobs
  • Domain of money
    • Earnings and income equality still out of reach
    • Single women, particularly in old age, are at highest risk of poverty
    • COVID-19 exacerbates women’s economic vulnerability and hardship
  • Domain of knowledge
    • Snail-pace progress comes to a halt
    • Hard-to-reach groups would benefit most from adult learning
    • School closures due to COVID-19 reinforce and add new inequalities in education and unpaid work
  • Domain of time
    • Gender inequalities in use of time live on
    • Gender differences on household chores entrenched from childhood
    • Unpaid care workloads and social isolation affect well-being
  • Domain of power
    • Decision-making gains drive gender equality progress
    • Legislative action makes a difference
    • Gender-balanced decision-making is imperative post pandemic
  • Domain of health
    • Enduring health inequalities stall progress
    • COVID-19 lowers life expectancy for men and birth rates
  • Domain of violence
    • A dearth of evidence hampers true assessment of violence against women
    • Inequalities heighten the risk of violence against women
    • Gender-based violence amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Thematic focus
    • Gender inequalities in health in the European Union
      • Gender differences in health reflect lifelong inequalities
        • Men are more likely to perceive their health as good
        • Women are more likely to have health limitations over their lifetime
        • The main causes of premature mortality are gendered
        • Women report poorer mental well-being than men
        • Gender differences in mental disorders begin early in life
        • Gender-based violence
        • Work stressors
        • Traditional norms of masculinity
        • Body image drives poor mental health, especially in youth
      • Health and risk behaviours are clearly gendered
      • Gender and intersecting inequalities in access to health services
    • Health dimensions in focus
      • Rights, access and outcomes – sexual and reproductive health in focus
      • The COVID-19 pandemic aggravates and brings forth health inequalities
  • Conclusions
  • References
  • Abbreviations

Men are more likely to perceive their health as good

Self-reported health (self-rated health, self-assessed health or self-perceived health) is a person’s subjective evaluation of their current health status (Lorem et al., 2017). Overall, women tend to report worse health than men (Nesson and Robinson, 2019), except on hearing problems and cardiovascular diseases (Caroli and Weber-Baghdiguian, 2016). In a 2002–2004 study of 59 countries globally, women reported significantly poorer health than men on all self-reported health indicators at all ages – although differences were smaller from 60 years onwards – and in all regions, with the smallest disparities in high-income European countries (Boerma et al., 2016).

In the EU-27, 66 % of women and 71 % of men perceive their health to be good or very good (Figure 24). Gender gaps in self-reported health are greater in Portugal, Latvia and Lithuania (10 p.p.), and in Romania and Bulgaria (9 p.p.). Only in Ireland do women and men equally perceive being in good health. The share of women considering themselves in good health is lowest in Hungary, Estonia, Portugal, Latvia and Lithuania.

Among adolescents, gender gaps in self-reported health are slightly more pronounced than for the adult population, with 30 % of girls and 39 % of boys rating their health as excellent[1].

Figure 24. Women and men perceiving their health as good or very good by EU Member State (%, 16+ years, EU, 2019)
Source: Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/hlth_silc_01.

Age, disability and education are important markers in shaping individual health status, with self-reported health levels the lowest for women with disabilities, women over 65 years and retired women (Figure 25).

Figure 25. Women and men perceiving their health as good or very good by sex, family composition, age, education, country of birth, disability and labour status (%, 16+ years, EU, 2019)
NB: EU-born and non-EU born are based on 21 countries (DE, EE, LV, MT, RO and SI are excluded).
Source: Authors’ calculation with microdata, EU-SILC, 2019 (IE, IT, 2018).

Table 19 in Annex 4 presents the share of people across population groups reporting their health as being good or very good from various data sources. It signalises how gender intersects with income levels, living environments (rural, suburban or urban), sexual orientation and migration status to determine a person’s likelihood of having good health.

According to WHO, many conditions and factors impacting people’s health are not under individual control. These include income, social status, education, physical environment, social support networks, genetics, health services and gender.

Research has highlighted gender-specific effects of three major SDH – education, employment and income levels. Education has long been known to be a crucial life resource for maintaining good health. Research in nine EU countries shows that higher levels of education have positive effects on the health of women and men (Uccheddu et al., 2019), particularly in countries promoting more women’s employment. Similarly, an analysis based on EU-SILC data indicates both that the probability of poor self-perceived health generally is higher among women than among men and that the biggest gender differences in self-perceived health are among individuals with relatively low levels of education in countries with the greatest gender employment gaps, that is in southern and eastern European countries (Gumà et al., 2019).

Employment status influences people’s health through income, social status and its impact on distress (Marmot et al., 2012).Employment and higher quality of work are linked to bette r health at individual level (Barnay, 2016; Henseke, 2018). Although working has a significant positive impact on the health of women and men, its effects are stronger for men (Hosseinpoor et al., 2012). In the EU, working women and men are more likely than those not in paid work, the unemployed or retirees to rate their health as good or very good (Figure 25).

Lack of paid work is likely to affect women’s health disproportionately. For instance, Boerma et al. (2016) found that greater gender gaps in employment and education lead to greater gender gaps in health assessment, to women’s detriment. This is particularly the case in Greece, Spain, Cyprus and Portugal, where women’s labour market participation is low (Palència et al., 2014) . Therefore, being in employment may result in lower health gains for women than for men, but being employed still leads to better health outcomes than being unemployed. Gender inequalities in employment and working conditions are also connected to inequalities in health. Precarious employment is considered an SDH (Benach et al., 2014; Siegrist et al., 2016). For example, a review of 27 studies found that temporary work explained between 11 % and 23 % of the variation in poor mental health (Vives Vergara, 2010). Less is known about how gender inequalities in employment and occupational position are related to health and health inequalities. An umbrella review of macroeconomic determinants of health shows that job promotion and improved working conditions can help enhance health and reduce gender-based health inequalities (Naik et al., 2019).

Income is closely linked to individual health – higher income supports good and improved health, while better health enables higher income (Deaton, 2002; Smith, 1999). Income could be causally related to health through a direct effect on the material conditions necessary for biological survival, and indirectly through social participation and ability to control life circumstances that condition health and health risks (Lynch et al., 2004; 2002). Depending on the healthcare system, level of income determines whether healthcare is affordable and accessible because it affects an individual’s ability to pay for medical services out of their own pocket (OECD/European Union, 2018). The effect of income on health varies according to gender. A quantitative meta-analysis (Furnée et al., 2011) found significant income-related variation in self-reported poor health between women and men in different countries, even if income or standards of living were comparable.

The extent to which income impacts health status across the EU depends on country-specific contexts. Factors such as pension and wage policies play an important role (Paul Leigh et al., 2019). They are particularly relevant to the health and well-being of older people, especially women, whose income in old age reflects limited economic independence and the cumulative effect of gender inequalities over a lifetime[2] (EIGE, 2015, 2016, 2020e, 2020g).

 

Footnotes

[1] Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey for children aged 11, 13 and 15 years, 2017/2018. Authors’ calculations. NB: EU: unweighted average.

[2] The financial impact of gender inequalities over the life course is reflected in the gender pension gap. In the EU in 2019, the average pension received by women at age 65 was 30 % lower than that of men. Eurostat, EU-SILC survey, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/ilc_pnp13.

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lietuva
  • El. paštas: eige.sec@eige.europa.eu
  • Telefonas: +370 5 215 7444
  • Administracija: +370 5 215 7400
  • Užpildykite šią formą, jei norite susisiekti su mumis / mūsų vieta žemėlapyje

    Find us

    image of map

    Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Media enquiries

    • Georgie Bradley
    •  +370 6 982 7826
    • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

    EIGE in social media

    • Follow us on Twitter
    • Follow us on Facebook
    • Follow us on Youtube
    • Follow us on Linkedin
    EIGE logo
    Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
     

    © 2023 Europos lyčių lygybės institutas

    Help us improve

    Take me to top

    • Web Accessibility
    • Legal notices
    • Personal Data Protection
    • Cookies Policy
    • The UK on EIGE's website
    • Contact us
    • Login