• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Pereiti į pagrindinį turinį
  • Skip to footer
Europos lyčių lygybės institutas logoEuropos lyčių lygybės institutas
Paieška

Paieškos forma

Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
        • What is gender budgeting?
          • Introducing gender budgeting
          • Gender budgeting in women’s and men’s lived realities
          • What does gender budgeting involve in practice?
          • Gender budgeting in the EU Funds
            • Gender budgeting as a way of complying with EU legal requirements
            • Gender budgeting as a way of promoting accountability and transparency
            • Gender budgeting as a way of increasing participation in budget processes
            • Gender budgeting as a way of advancing gender equality
        • Why is gender budgeting important in the EU Funds?
          • Three reasons why gender budgeting is crucial in the EU Funds
        • How can we apply gender budgeting in the EU Funds? Practical tools and Member State examples
          • Tool 1: Connecting the EU Funds with the EU’s regulatory framework on gender equality
            • Legislative and regulatory basis for EU policies on gender equality
            • Concrete requirements for considering gender equality within the EU Funds
            • EU Funds’ enabling conditions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 2: Analysing gender inequalities and gender needs at the national and sub-national levels
            • Steps to assess and analyse gender inequalities and needs
            • Step 1. Collect information and disaggregated data on the target group
            • Step 2. Identify existing gender inequalities and their underlying causes
            • Step 3. Consult directly with the target groups
            • Step 4. Draw conclusions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 3: Operationalising gender equality in policy objectives and specific objectives/measures
            • Steps for operationalising gender equality in Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes
            • General guidance on operationalising gender equality when developing policy objectives, specific objectives and measures
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Partnership Agreements
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Operational Programmes
            • Examples of integrating gender equality as a horizontal principle in policy objectives and specific objectives
          • Tool 4: Coordination and complementarities between the EU Funds to advance work-life balance
            • Steps for enhancing coordination and complementarities between the funds
            • Step 1. Alignment with the EU’s strategic engagement goals for gender equality and national gender equality goals
            • Steps 2 and 3. Identifying and developing possible work-life balance interventions
            • Step 4. Following-up through the use of indicators within M&E systems
            • Fictional case study 1: reconciling paid work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 2: reconciling shift work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 3: balancing care for oneself and others
            • Fictional case study 4: reconciling care for children and older persons with shift work
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 5: Defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Steps for defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 6: Developing quantitative and qualitative indicators for advancing gender equality
            • Steps to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
            • ERDF and Cohesion Fund
            • ESF+
            • EMFF
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 7: Defining gender-sensitive project selection criteria
            • Steps to support gender-sensitive project development and selection
            • Checklist to guide the preparation of calls for project proposals
            • Checklist for project selection criteria
            • Supplementary tool 7.a: Gender-responsive agreements with project implementers
          • Tool 8: Tracking resource allocations for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Tool 9: Mainstreaming gender equality in project design
            • Steps to mainstream gender equality in project design
            • Step 1. Alignment with partnership agreements’ and Operational Programmes’ gender objectives and indicators
            • Step 2. Project development and application
            • Step 3. Project implementation
            • Step 4. Project assessment
          • Tool 10: Integrating a gender perspective in monitoring and evaluation processes
            • Steps to integrate a gender perspective in M&E processes
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 11: Reporting on resource spending for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Tracking expenditures for gender equality
            • Additional resources
          • References
          • Abbreviations
          • Acknowledgements
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
  • Pirmas
  • EIGE’s publications
  • EIGE-2021 Gender Equality Index 2021 Report: Health
  • Thematic focus
  • Gender inequalities in health in the European Union

EIGE-2021 Gender Equality Index 2021 Report: Health

PrintDownload as PDF
  • Back to toolkit page
  • Foreword
  • Highlights
  • Thematic focus: health
  • Introduction
  • Gender equality in the European Union at a glance
    • Progress is an uphill struggle
    • Decision-making driving change, segregation blocking it
    • Small drop in disparities in gender equality across the European Union, but COVID-19 could change that
  • Domain of work
    • Fragile pace of change since 2010
    • Unpaid childcare still hindering women from working full time
    • Women bear the brunt of the impact of COVID-19 on jobs
  • Domain of money
    • Earnings and income equality still out of reach
    • Single women, particularly in old age, are at highest risk of poverty
    • COVID-19 exacerbates women’s economic vulnerability and hardship
  • Domain of knowledge
    • Snail-pace progress comes to a halt
    • Hard-to-reach groups would benefit most from adult learning
    • School closures due to COVID-19 reinforce and add new inequalities in education and unpaid work
  • Domain of time
    • Gender inequalities in use of time live on
    • Gender differences on household chores entrenched from childhood
    • Unpaid care workloads and social isolation affect well-being
  • Domain of power
    • Decision-making gains drive gender equality progress
    • Legislative action makes a difference
    • Gender-balanced decision-making is imperative post pandemic
  • Domain of health
    • Enduring health inequalities stall progress
    • COVID-19 lowers life expectancy for men and birth rates
  • Domain of violence
    • A dearth of evidence hampers true assessment of violence against women
    • Inequalities heighten the risk of violence against women
    • Gender-based violence amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Thematic focus
    • Gender inequalities in health in the European Union
      • Gender differences in health reflect lifelong inequalities
        • Men are more likely to perceive their health as good
        • Women are more likely to have health limitations over their lifetime
        • The main causes of premature mortality are gendered
        • Women report poorer mental well-being than men
        • Gender differences in mental disorders begin early in life
        • Gender-based violence
        • Work stressors
        • Traditional norms of masculinity
        • Body image drives poor mental health, especially in youth
      • Health and risk behaviours are clearly gendered
      • Gender and intersecting inequalities in access to health services
    • Health dimensions in focus
      • Rights, access and outcomes – sexual and reproductive health in focus
      • The COVID-19 pandemic aggravates and brings forth health inequalities
  • Conclusions
  • References
  • Abbreviations

Health and risk behaviours are clearly gendered

WHO defines health behaviour as ‘any activity undertaken by an individual, regardless of actual or perceived health status, for the purpose of promoting, protecting or maintaining health, whether or not such behaviour is objectively effective towards that end’ (Nutbeam, 1998). Health behaviour and health status are interlinked, since the activities shaping the first influence the outcomes of the second. Health behaviours have different characteristics and aims. While health-promoting behaviours are purposefully espoused to protect and maintain health status, risk behaviours are adopted despite their harmful consequences (Nutbeam, 1998). The Gender Equality Index monitors both types of health behaviour. Indicators for health-protecting behaviour include diet and exercise, while health risk behaviour covers activities such as heavy drinking and smoking[1].

Gender is an important social determinant of health, shaping and reproducing how women and men engage in health behaviour. Research often frames women as as engaging in health-promoting behaviour, whereas men are portrayed as taking more risks (Courtenay, 2000), a pattern visible in the EU. However, on average, the EU population does too little physical activity and consumes insufficient fruit and vegetables regardless of gender, despite WHO recommendations.

Women are less physically active but eat more healthily

Physical activity is an important component of healthy behaviour recommended for all ages and in stages of the life cycle, including during pregnancy and post partum. The health benefits of exercise range from better cognitive and mental health to improved cardiovascular activity and, ultimately, lower all-cause mortality rates. The WHO recommends that all adults aged between 18 and 64 years engage in at least 150–300 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or between 75 and –150  minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise every week (WHO, 2020h).

On average, approximately more than half the EU adult population is missing the target of 3 hours a week (Figure 33). The gender gap in physical activity across the EU is 5 p.p. in men’s favour. Estonia is the only Member State where slightly more women than men engage in physical activity, and it is also the country with the highest proportion (85 %) of people exercising[2]. Belgium has the largest gap (11.7 p.p.) in weekly exercise between women and men, while Denmark is the only Member State without a gender gap. Throughout life (16–75+ years), gender gaps in physical activity remain the lowest, at 1 p.p., between the ages of 50 and 64 years. The biggest gender gaps are among young adults (16–24 years) and elderly people (75+ years). In both cases, the gender gap is 10 p.p. to women’s detriment[3].

Figure 33. Women and men performing physical activity outside working time for at least 180 minutes per week, by sex and EU Member State (%, 16+ years, 2017)
Source: Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/ilc_hch07.
EU: Eurostat estimation, EE, LT, SK: low reliability

In the EU, gender gaps in physical activity emerge before adulthood. WHO underlines the importance of exercise for children and adolescents, recommending even higher amounts of daily activity because of ongoing physical and cognitive development during this life stage (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2020a). HBSC survey data shows that children’s level of activity tends to decline between the ages of 11 and 15 years, especially among girls (WHO, 2016a, WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2017), with parental income key to determining children’s access to sports (Richter et al., 2009). Among 11-, 13- and 15-year-olds, boys more often than girls report daily moderate to vigorous physical activity of at least 60 minutes. The EU gender gap in this instance is 7 p.p. The largest gender gaps are noted in Spain, at 14 p.p., and Austria, Finland and Ireland – all at 11 p.p.

Gaps are even more pronounced in the share of girls and boys engaging in vigorous physical activity at least four times a week. Here the EU gender gap doubles to 15 p.p., again to the detriment of girls. France and Luxembourg have the highest gaps, of 23 p.p.[4]. Exercise in adolescence is particularly important because regular physical activity, such as school-based high-impact exercise protocols, can improve bone mass and prevent osteoporosis. This condition affects half of all women in old age, but only a fifth of men (Xu et al., 2016). Adolescence is also when physical activity habits lasting into adulthood are established (Currie, 2016).

Physical and social activity have been proven to be positively associated with better health (Roychowdhury, 2020). However, women and men have different patterns of social activities and different amounts and uses of leisure time (EIGE, 2020g)[5]. The diminishing boundaries between professional and personal time created by digitalisation have seen paid work increasingly encroaching on leisure time, especially for women in precarious employment (EIGE, 2020g; European Parliament, 2016a; Wajcman, 2015).

Research suggests that less physically active women tend to report more barriers to exercise (E. S. Edwards and Sackett, 2016). Since women generally do most of the childcare and housework, they have less leisure time available for physical activities than do men (The Lancet Public Health, 2019). Environmental and socioeconomic factors also determine women’s and men’s engagement in physical activities. A Eurofound study on social insecurities and resilience suggests that women and men have different risk perceptions of outdoor surroundings after dark. Women living in the poorest urban settings feel the most insecure in their neighbourhood (Eurofound, 2018a). For them, physical activity outside is a safety risk, discouraging them from exercising, including walking or running.

Although it is too soon to know the long lasting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on activity levels, there are already indications of gendered changes in physical activity. Lockdown measures at the start of the pandemic led to men, particularly younger men, doing less physical activity. Research in Croatia (Sekulic et al., 2020) and Italy (Giustino et al., 2020) suggests that this is because young men rely more on outdoor and team sports, which were more severely restricted by social distancing orders than the home-based, individual exercise women more often participate in. A systematic review found that people who exercised regularly before the pandemic increased their physical activity during lockdown, while those who did not were even more sedentary (Khan et al., 2021).

Healthy diets are key to prevent or delay NCDs such as diabetes, hypertension, cancer and osteoporosis (WHO, 2003). This is particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic, as NCDs put individuals at greater risk of severe health outcomes and death in the case of infection. Men’s higher mortality rate during the pandemic is partly due to their higher levels of NCDs (see Section 9.2.2.).

For adults, healthy eating involves at least 400 g (or five portions) of fruit and non-starchy vegetables as daily target (WHO, 2020d). Although the exact breakdown, preparation method and weight amount differ across Member States, all have implemented WHO guidelines and recommend eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables daily in their national dietary guidelines (European Commission, 2021f).

Figure 34. Women and men consuming at least five portions of fruits and vegetables daily, by EU Member State (%, 15–64 years, 2014)
Source: Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/hlth_ehis_fv3e.

Data from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) (2014) shows that barely 1 in 10 adults meet these recommendations, and large gender gaps exist in healthy eating across the EU. On average, the share of women who consume the recommended five daily portions of fruit and vegetables is almost twice that for men (Figure 34). The share of women meeting the daily target is lowest in eastern and south-eastern Member States, and highest in Ireland and Denmark. Ireland also has the most men meeting WHO recommendations, with more recent data on living conditions in Europe confirming this[6]. Although Ireland, Denmark and the Netherlands have more men eating the required daily amounts of fruit and vegetables, substantial gender gaps remain when compared with women. Overall, men are more likely to have poor diets and to engage in dietary risk behaviour. This is particularly so among men over 50 years. The highest rates of loss of healthy life years among men attributable to poor diet are in eastern Europe, but men in western Europe also show distinct patterns of unhealthy eating behaviour, with diets low in fruits, nuts and vegetables (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2018).

Gender differences in healthy dietary behaviour exist across the age spectrum. For example, the Healthy Lifestyle by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) study examines healthy eating behaviours among adolescents in 10 Member States. Girls have a greater variety of healthy diet patterns, greater availability of fruit at home and more awareness of what it means to eat healthily than boys (González-Gil et al., 2019). In addition, the authors noted that healthy diet patterns are determined by the food choices parents provide, regardless of gender. Both these observations – the gender gap in fruit consumption and parental influence on adolescents’ healthy eating behaviour – are also made in a WHO report examining the health behaviour of school-aged children (Inchley et al., 2016). The report also shows that income and family affluence are a driving factor for healthy eating behaviour. Adolescents living in more affluent households are more likely to share meals with family members and have more access to fruit. Adolescents from low-affluence households, especially girls, reported a higher consumption of sugared drinks. These findings underline the need for healthy foods, such as fruit and vegetables, to be affordable, available and accessible to all ages, and for their consumption to not be feminised.

A systematic review of dietary behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic concluded that gender and low income are determinants of weight gain (Khan et al., 2021). These factors play a particularly influential role in the health behaviour of lone mothers, who are likely to spend a disproportionate amount of their income on healthy food for their children, neglecting their own health by going without food or making cheap, unhealthy, choices, often leading to weight gain (Martin and Lippert, 2012). As of 2015, Finland was the only country to provide free school meals for all pupils and students at all levels, from pre-primary to upper secondary (Polish Eurydice Unit, 2016). While all Member States provide some school meal discounts for low-income families, school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic led to food insecurity for school-aged children and adolescents from less affluent backgrounds (Nicola et al., 2020).

Dietary behavioural change during the pandemic has been noted in women, but not necessarily in men. In a study of three Member States (DK, DE and SI), Janssen et al. (2021) noted that women increased their consumption of fruit and vegetables during the first month of the lockdown in 2020, in contrast to men. The authors attribute the growing gap in fruit and vegetable consumption to wider gendered patterns in health, since women are more likely to control their healthy eating behaviour and prevent or mitigate a possible COVID-19 infection.

Men are more likely to smoke and drink

Sociocultural norms and gendered attitudes shape willingness to engage in health-promoting or risky behaviours. Harmful perceptions of masculinity limit boys and men in their self-care and create barriers to healthy living and well-being. Acceptable norms for women and men, in terms of health behaviour, structure men’s health in two ways. First, societal gender norms discourage men from participating in health-promoting behaviour, usually seen as feminine, including using sunscreen (Courtenay, 2000), being a vegetarian (Bogueva et al., 2020) or getting psychological counselling (Seidler et al., 2016). Second, social acceptance of certain risky health behaviours. including unprotected sex, excessive use of harmful substances, extreme sports, violence, smoking and excessive alcohol consumption, is greater when such practices are carried out by men (Baker, 2019; Courtenay, 2000).

Between 2003 and 2005, smoking and hazardous drinking were responsible for substantial proportions of the mortality gender gap in 30 European countries. Smoking-related deaths accounted for 40–60 % of this gender gap in all surveyed countries; alcohol-related mortality accounted for 20–30 % of the gap in eastern Europe and 10–20 % elsewhere in Europe (G. McCartney et al., 2011). Although 15-year-old girls are slightly more likely to smoke than boys of the same age – 19 % compared with 17 % – the trend among adult is reversed (OECD/European Union, 2020).

In 2014, more men than women smoked daily in 26 Member States, with Sweden the only exception (Eurostat, 2020). Nationally, daily smoking figures ranged from 7.5 % in Sweden to 37.3 % in Cyprus for men, and from 8.3 % in Romania to 22 % in Austria for women. Several studies have identified factors linked to smoking and adverse health outcomes for women, including biological, genetic and hormonal factors, socioeconomic determinants, occupational exposure, job stress, personal lifestyle and passive smoking, or a combination of these factors (Syamlal et al., 2014). In addition, women find it harder to stop smoking than men. This is especially true for younger women with lower income and education levels, who are also more likely to continue smoking during pregnancy (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2021a). The same report found that only 11 % of warning images on tobacco packaging feature women, implying a gender gap in female representation in health prevention measures.

WHO Europe has declared the growing use of electronic cigarettes, especially among adolescents, as alarming for public health. Although there is no complete data set for the EU-27, countries with a high prevalence of adolescents using e-cigarettes are Poland (23.4 %), Latvia (18 %) and Italy (17.5 %) (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2020b). As with tobacco smoking, gendered patterns are visible in e-cigarette use. A systematic review covering the WHO Europe region found a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use among men, adolescents and young adults, tobacco cigarette smokers and former smokers (Kapan et al., 2020). Though further research is needed, a study on 14 to 17 year-olds in seven Member States found that boys are more likely than girls to use only e-cigarettes (Kinnunen et al., 2021). The same study also shows that more boys than girls smoke both tobacco and e-cigarettes.

Alcohol consumption is considered one of four key contributors to NCDs, for example diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and epilepsy. Harmful drinking is a risky health behaviour, with gendered implications. Drunkenness can lead to gender-based violence, hinder effective contraceptive use and cause adverse pregnancy outcomes such as fetal alcohol syndrome (WHO, 2019d). According to a WHO Europe report, Europe has the highest alcohol consumption worldwide, irrespective of gender (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2018). However, there is a pronounced gender difference in average heavy episodic or binge drinking[7]. Men engage in this behaviour twice as often as women (Figure 35). The lowest shares of men binge drinking at least once a month are in southern and Mediterranean Member States, at less than one in five, while more than a third of men drink excessively in Latvia and Lithuania.

Figure 35. Women and men engaging in heavy episodic drinking at least once a month, by EU Member State (%, 18–64 years, 2014)
Source: Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/hlth_ehis_al3e. No data available for FR and NL.

Alcohol consumption patterns differ when considering various socioeconomic factors. According to the OECD (2015), men with lower incomes do more heavy drinking than those with higher incomes. For women, this pattern is reversed. Drinking to relieve distress is noted predominantly in men, and far less so in women. Distress in men increases harmful drinking, including alcohol dependence, binge and hazardous drinking, and intoxication (de Goeij et al., 2015).

Research on 50 to 64 year-olds in 15 EU Member States and Switzerland shows that the prevalence of hazardous drinking is significantly higher among men than among women in most countries. Likewise, the risk of becoming a hazardous drinker is 1.69 times higher for men than for women (Bosque-Prous et al., 2015). Lower values on the gender empowerment measure[8] ‘economic and political participation, and power over economic resources’ and higher unemployment rates are linked to greater gender differences in such drinking. The authors suggest that this can be attributed to gendered patterns, as unemployed men drink more and unemployed women drink less, widening the overall gap (Bosque-Prous et al., 2015). Countries with the greatest gender differences in hazardous drinking are those with the greatest gender inequalities in daily life, while smaller gender differences seem to be related to higher consumption among women (Bosque-Prous et al., 2015). The authors note that women’s higher alcohol consumption in more gender-equal countries could be related to more progressive gender norms, making it easier for women to be targeted in alcohol adverts and for their risky drinking behaviour to be more acceptable.

A systematic review of alcohol consumption during economic crises over a 25-year period also reveals gendered differences. Emotional stress leads men to drink more whereas financial limitations result in women drinking less (De Goeij et al., 2015). In Poland, a study on health behavioural changes during the COVID-19 pandemic found that overall alcohol consumption has increased among men. Women are drinking the same amount as before, but are drinking different types of alcohol (Sidor and Rzymski, 2020). Robust evidence is still scarce and mostly based on national research

Footnotes

[1] It is important to note that the Index consults the share of the population that is not engaging in risk-taking health behaviour to have consistent measurements reflecting health-promoting behaviour. Therefore, a higher Index score for health behaviour indicates that a higher share of the population engages in physical activity and healthy diets, and drinks and smokes less.

[2] Values for Estonia are estimates. The reliability of the data is limited.

[3] EIGE calculations based on Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/ilc_hch07.

[4] HBSC survey 2017/2018, authors’ calculations. NB: EU: unweighted average.

[5] As highlighted in EIGE (2020g), data from the time domain shows that, among working adults, rates of regular participation in sport, cultural and leisure activities outside the home are extremely low in some countries, especially among women. The share of working women engaging in regular social activities outside the home varies widely, being lowest in in Romania (6 %), Portugal and Cyprus (10 % each) and Bulgaria and Greece (11 % each) and highest in Denmark (53 %), the Netherlands (56 %) and Finland (60 %).

[6] EU-SILC, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/ilc_hch11, 2017.

[7] Heavy episodic drinking is defined as 60 g or more of pure alcohol on at least once per month (WHO, 2019d).

[8] The gender empowerment measure has since been integrated into the United Nations Development Programme’s Gender Inequality Index, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/gender-inequality-index-gii.

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lietuva
  • El. paštas: eige.sec@eige.europa.eu
  • Telefonas: +370 5 215 7444
  • Administracija: +370 5 215 7400
  • Užpildykite šią formą, jei norite susisiekti su mumis / mūsų vieta žemėlapyje

    Find us

    image of map

    Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Media enquiries

    • Georgie Bradley
    •  +370 6 982 7826
    • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

    EIGE in social media

    • Follow us on Twitter
    • Follow us on Facebook
    • Follow us on Youtube
    • Follow us on Linkedin
    EIGE logo
    Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
     

    © 2023 Europos lyčių lygybės institutas

    Help us improve

    Take me to top

    • Web Accessibility
    • Legal notices
    • Personal Data Protection
    • Cookies Policy
    • The UK on EIGE's website
    • Contact us
    • Login