• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Pereiti į pagrindinį turinį
  • Skip to footer
Europos lyčių lygybės institutas logoEuropos lyčių lygybės institutas
Paieška

Paieškos forma

Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
        • What is gender budgeting?
          • Introducing gender budgeting
          • Gender budgeting in women’s and men’s lived realities
          • What does gender budgeting involve in practice?
          • Gender budgeting in the EU Funds
            • Gender budgeting as a way of complying with EU legal requirements
            • Gender budgeting as a way of promoting accountability and transparency
            • Gender budgeting as a way of increasing participation in budget processes
            • Gender budgeting as a way of advancing gender equality
        • Why is gender budgeting important in the EU Funds?
          • Three reasons why gender budgeting is crucial in the EU Funds
        • How can we apply gender budgeting in the EU Funds? Practical tools and Member State examples
          • Tool 1: Connecting the EU Funds with the EU’s regulatory framework on gender equality
            • Legislative and regulatory basis for EU policies on gender equality
            • Concrete requirements for considering gender equality within the EU Funds
            • EU Funds’ enabling conditions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 2: Analysing gender inequalities and gender needs at the national and sub-national levels
            • Steps to assess and analyse gender inequalities and needs
            • Step 1. Collect information and disaggregated data on the target group
            • Step 2. Identify existing gender inequalities and their underlying causes
            • Step 3. Consult directly with the target groups
            • Step 4. Draw conclusions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 3: Operationalising gender equality in policy objectives and specific objectives/measures
            • Steps for operationalising gender equality in Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes
            • General guidance on operationalising gender equality when developing policy objectives, specific objectives and measures
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Partnership Agreements
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Operational Programmes
            • Examples of integrating gender equality as a horizontal principle in policy objectives and specific objectives
          • Tool 4: Coordination and complementarities between the EU Funds to advance work-life balance
            • Steps for enhancing coordination and complementarities between the funds
            • Step 1. Alignment with the EU’s strategic engagement goals for gender equality and national gender equality goals
            • Steps 2 and 3. Identifying and developing possible work-life balance interventions
            • Step 4. Following-up through the use of indicators within M&E systems
            • Fictional case study 1: reconciling paid work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 2: reconciling shift work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 3: balancing care for oneself and others
            • Fictional case study 4: reconciling care for children and older persons with shift work
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 5: Defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Steps for defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 6: Developing quantitative and qualitative indicators for advancing gender equality
            • Steps to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
            • ERDF and Cohesion Fund
            • ESF+
            • EMFF
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 7: Defining gender-sensitive project selection criteria
            • Steps to support gender-sensitive project development and selection
            • Checklist to guide the preparation of calls for project proposals
            • Checklist for project selection criteria
            • Supplementary tool 7.a: Gender-responsive agreements with project implementers
          • Tool 8: Tracking resource allocations for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Tool 9: Mainstreaming gender equality in project design
            • Steps to mainstream gender equality in project design
            • Step 1. Alignment with partnership agreements’ and Operational Programmes’ gender objectives and indicators
            • Step 2. Project development and application
            • Step 3. Project implementation
            • Step 4. Project assessment
          • Tool 10: Integrating a gender perspective in monitoring and evaluation processes
            • Steps to integrate a gender perspective in M&E processes
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 11: Reporting on resource spending for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Tracking expenditures for gender equality
            • Additional resources
          • References
          • Abbreviations
          • Acknowledgements
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
  • Pirmas
  • News

100th International Women’s Day - 100 Inequalities remain

PrintDownload as PDF
Naujienos
Publication date:
04 Kovas 2011

8 March 2011 marks the 100th anniversary of International Women’s Day.EIGE’s list of 100 Inequalitiesillustrate that we are still a long way from achieving gender equality.

EIGE’s list of 100 Inequalities – a mere indication of today's inequalities - demonstrates that despite the achievements of the past 100 years, gender inequality remains an issue. Women are in general not paid equally for the same job as men, women are not equally represented in business and in politics, and women’s health, education, and violence against women, are all burning issues.

EIGE’s Director Virginija Langbakk, says: "Inequality is still obvious in many areas. Women represent an average of 59 percent of university graduates in the EU yet only 3 percent of company presidents are women and only 12 percent of corporate boards. On average, in the EU, women’s unemployment rate remains higher than men’s".

Removing barriers to gender equality, tackling gender-based violence, getting more women into the labour market , company boardrooms and into top level jobs, has a positive impact on the economy and on the development of each woman and man.

The Bank of Italy estimates that if female employment rose to 60 percent, gross domestic product would rise 7%. “In a country where growth is at 1%, that’s something to keep in mind” said Anna Maria Tarantola, the bank’s deputy director general (International Herald Tribune – Thursday Feb 3).

In addition to the list of 100 Inequalities, EIGE is holding an event in Budapest, Hungary (holding the Presidency of the EU Council). The event will bring together stakeholders and media to discuss how to tackle gender inequality issues (view photos from the consultation meeting). On the same day - from its headquarters in Vilnius, Lithuania – EIGE will host an array of women Ambassadors who will present a number of inequalities which still exist in their countries (view photos from the event).

By working together we can ensure that there is a lot to celebrate every International Women’s Day.

Download the Press release (.pdf, 61.1KB)

1. In 2009, the rate of employment for women in the EU was 12.1 percentage points lower than the same rate for men in employment [1]. 2. 31% of employed women in the EU only worked part time in comparison to a mere 7.4% of men in 2009 [2].
3. The rate for women at risk of poverty in 2007 stood at 17% compared to 15% for men. When it came to the elderly, the same rate stood at 22% for women compared to 17% for men (and 34% for single parents) [3]. 4. In 2008, the rate for women’s unemployment was 0.9% greater than men's [3].
5. The unemployment rate of migrant women (14%) is higher than that of migrant men (11.3 %) [4]. 6. There are consistently fewer employed women with disabilities than employed men with disabilities [5].
7. With more women working in the public sector, the impact of job losses as a result of the economic crisis and budget cuts is felt more with them than with men [3]. 8. Experiences from past crises show that men's employment generally recovers faster than women’s [6].
9. The risk of not being re-employed is higher for women [3]. 10. Having children affects the employment rates of women and men differently. Women's participation in the labour market drops by an average of 12% whereas men’s increases by 9.1% [7].
11. In 2008, women with children under 12 had a significantly lower employment rate than those without, 67% and 78.5% respectively, a negative difference of 11.5 percentage point [3]. 12. In 2008, men with children under 12 had a significantly higher employment rate than those without, 91.6% vs. 84.8%, a positive difference of 6.8 percentage point [3].
13. Around 30% of working-age women with care responsibilities are either economically inactive or work part-time due to the lack of care services for children and other dependent persons [3]. 14. Gender pay and work gaps in full and part-time employment tend to arise between the ages of 25 and 35, showing the high impact of family responsibilities on female employment [8].
15. 84% of men who either have one or more children, or their wife/partner is expecting a child - have neither considered nor taken parental leave. Almost all eligible mothers make use of their right to parental leave further aggravating the gap [9]. 16. Employed women spend 39 hours a week on average on home care activities compared to men's 26 hours [10].
17. Care responsibilities for adult dependent persons in 2005 amounted to almost double in women (12.8 million) than in men (7.6 million) [3]. 18. In 2008, the women's employment between the ages of 55-64 was 18.2 points lower than men's, partly because of their care responsibilities for adult dependent persons [3].
19. Despite spending fewer hours on average in paid employment, women work more hours than men when combining unpaid work (e.g. household chores, childcare, care of elderly and sick family members, voluntary work) with paid work [11]. 20. Women aged 25 to 44 spend practically three times longer than men do on childcare per day (60 minutes for women to 22 minutes for men) [11].
21. Women aged 15-24 work an hour longer every day than men when preparing food, washing dishes, and cleaning the house are taken into account [11]. 22. In 2008, women on average were paid 17.5% less than men in the EU [12].
23. Women are over-represented in health care, education and public administration which are generally sectors receiving lower salaries than typical male professions [13]. 24. Within the same sector or company, the jobs done by women tend to be valued and paid less for [13].
25. Female entrepreneurs account for only 33.2 per cent of self-employed women [14]. 26. More men than women openly state that they prefer self–employment: around 50% of men state this, compared to around 40% of women [15].
27. Women account for only 36 % of graduates in science, maths, informatics and engineering [8]. 28. The proportion of female students (55%) and graduates (59%) exceeds that of male students, but is lower among PhD students (48%) and PhD graduates (45%) [8].
29. The fields of science, mathematics and computing and particularly engineering, manufacturing and construction is characterised by higher numbers of male PhD holders with women representing less than 25% [8]. 30. Only 19 % of grade A[16] academic professors in public universities are women [8].
31. The proportion of women among full professors is highest in humanities and in the social sciences (27% and 18.6%) and lowest in engineering and technology (7.2%) [8]. 32. Women represent 39% of researchers in the government sector, 37% of all researchers in higher education and a mere 19% in the business sector [8].
33. Female researchers feature in higher proportions in social sciences, agricultural sciences, medical sciences, and humanities than in engineering and technology, a key research area [8]. 34. On average 32% of scientists and engineers are women in the EU-27 [8].
35. Women account for 59% of university graduates, whereas men account for 82% of full professors [8]. 36. Only 13% of institutions in higher education are headed by women and just 9% of universities are led by a woman [8].
37. On average in the EU-27, only 22% of board members of universities and research institutes are women [8]. 38. In 2004, in primary and secondary schools, over 68% of teachers were women. In contrast to this, in universities and in other tertiary-level education, women only made-up less than 40% of teachers [17].
39. Of a total of 543 Nobel prizes and prizes in Economic Sciences awarded since 1901, only 41 have been awarded to women [8]. 40. On average women have lower pension incomes in the EU [18].
41. In 2008, the risk of poverty among elderly women stood at 22% compared to 16% for elderly men [18]. 42. In 2008, 35% of single parents (mostly single mothers) were exposed to a high poverty risk [18].
43. Women with disabilities and from minority ethnic groups experience higher poverty risks than men, have worse access to employment, education, health and social services [19]. 44. In the majority of EU countries, migrant women in employment lag behind non-migrant women by as much as 30% [20].
45. Almost two thirds of female immigrants are active in low-skilled jobs which contribute to restricted rights and instability as well as creating fewer opportunities for upward mobility [21]. 46. Highly skilled migrant women are on average twice as likely to be employed in low-skilled jobs when compared to EU nationals with the same level of education [21].
47. All over the world, women face a higher risk of poverty than men. 17 % of women in the EU (compared to 15% of men) live below the poverty line [22]. 48. Poverty risk is on the up amongst women in old age than for men over 65 (22% for women to 17% for men) [23].
49. Women only make up 35% of members of the European Parliament, and 33% of the European Commission [24]. 50. In 2010, women accounted for an average of 24% of members of national parliaments in the EU [24].
51. On average, an election featuring 50% of women candidates would result in a parliament with only 39% women members [25]. 52. In decision-making, women currently only occupy 35% of senior positions within government ministries [26].

53. At the very top level positions within government ministries, there are merely 26% of women present [26].

54. Women lead just one in seven regional assemblies in the EU (14%) and account for less than a third of their members (30%) [26].
55. Women with disabilities are under-represented in democratic processes and decision-making overall as well as in recreational activities, culture and sport [19]. 56. Amongst the largest publicly listed companies in the EU Member States, 38% have no women on the boards and only 28% have more than one [25].
57. In 2010, there were only 3% of women presidents in companies and 12% members of the board of directors [27]. 58. Only 20% of women were in the highest decision making bodies of the employee representatives in the largest companies [27].
59. In the private sector across the EU, women account for less than one third (32%) of business leaders [28]. 60. The governors of all central banks across Europe are men and the key decision-making bodies comprise 83% men and just 17% women [25].
61. 20-25 % of all women have experienced physical violence at least once during their adult lives and more than 10% have suffered sexual violence involving the use of force [29]. 62. Violence has serious immediate and long-term implications for health and psychological and social development for women and children [30]. Violence causes physical damage including incapacity, miscarriages, broken limbs, and cuts and bruises [31].
63. Sexual offences bring the risk of HIV, sexually transmitted diseases and forced/unwanted pregnancies [31]. 64. Thousands of women in Europe are killed every year by partners or ex-partners [31].
65. Between 40 and 50% of women in the European Union report some form of sexual harassment in the workplace [32]. 66. 500,000 girls and women in the EU are affected by female genital mutilation or threatened by this practice [33].
67. Many older women face neglect or abuse by carers; they are more likely to be mistreated than older men) [34]. 68. The total annual cost of domestic violence against women in the 27 member states of the EU was estimated to almost as €16.000.000.000 in 2006 [35].
69. Many women-violence survivors have limited access to support through specialist services or refuges that can meet their needs. Services provided by the state are often linked to legal status, official reporting channels and/or the criminal justice system [31]. 70. Sexual violence still carries among the lowest conviction rates for any crime, and high levels of ‘attrition’ in the course of investigations and prosecutions [36].
71. Only 26% of news subjects are occupied by women in contrast to 74% of men [37]. 72. There are four men for every woman who receive news coverage [38].
73. In Europe, women are central to a news story only 10% of the time [38]. 74. Only 32% of main TV characters are female [38].
75. Women athletes only secure between 2-9% of television airtime devoted to sports [38]. 76. Only 10% of European politicians in the news are women [39].
77. Women make up only 16% of experts and 14% of spokespersons [39]. 78. Women are twice as likely to appear as news subjects in stories on social issues than in stories on politics or government [38].
79. 31% stories on newspapers, 40% stories on radio and 42% stories on TV are reported by women [40]. 80. Women are more than twice as likely as men to be portrayed as victims [38].
81. Women represent 27% of the employees or professionals shown in adverts [38]. 82. Adverts showing boys place them outside of the house 85% of the time. Adverts featuring girls place them more than half of the time in the home [38].
83. In advertisements, women are more than twice as likely to be portrayed (semi-) naked than men [41]. 84. The fashion industry is eroticising increasingly younger girl models, and adopting the visual images of vulnerability common in pornographic media [42].
85. 38% of the female characters in video games are scantily clad, 23% baring breasts or cleavage, 31% exposing thighs, another 31% exposing stomachs or midriffs and 15% baring their behinds [43]. 86. Women are more often valued for their looks, being far more likely to be portrayed at a young age; 79% of women portrayed in media are up to the age of 34 [40].
87. In 2000, there were 9.3% women in top management positions in the telecommunication industry in the EU and European Economic Area and only 3% of women journalists were in decision making positions [44]. 88. 62% of women compared to 68% of men use the internet on average at least once a week [45].
89. A new record for women’s participation in the Olympic Winter Games was set in Vancouver in 2010 where 40% of the athletes taking part were women [46]. 90. Reported discrimination by policewomen in the area of promotion is 14% in Eastern Europe and 26% in western Europe [47].
91. 78% of part-time workers are female against 22 % of men in 2008 [48]. 92. Depression is more common in women then in men (life time prevalence: 9.4%; 12 months prevalence: 2.8%) [12].
93. It is estimated that 6 in 10,000 European women suffer from anorexia and 8.5 in 10,000 from bulimia and this number is rising [49]. 94. Smoking prevalence is lower in women than in men; however, this gap has been closing in resent years due to decreasing numbers of men smoking and increasing numbers of women smoking [11].
95. The use of tranquilisers and sedative substances is more common in school-age girls than boys [11]. 96. Women (especially very young women) are more vulnerable to sexually transmitted diseases compared to men and the consequences are more serious for them [50].
97. The average hourly earnings in 24 Member States of the European Union4 are EUR 8,58 for women and EUR 10,43 for men [51]. 98. The gender gap in the armed forces is enormous: the armed forces of all Member States are almost completely dominated by men. In 2009 7.9% women were involved in the armed forces, compared to 92.1% of men[51], [52].
99. In the diplomatic service of the 22 EU Member States, the EU average is 38% of women[51], [52]. 100. The EU average of women ambassadors is 13.5%[51], [52].

Sources:

[1] Eurostat, Labor Force Survey, 2010. Female in employment in age groups 15-64 as a proportion of total population in the same age group. Male in employment in age groups 15-64 as a proportion of total population in the same age group. The employment rate is calculated by dividing the number of persons aged 15-64 in employment by the total population of the same age group
[2] Eurostat, Labor Force Survey, presented in the Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the European Commission’s Communication ‘Strategy for Equality between Women and Men 2010-2015, (COM (2010) 491, SEC (2010) 1079), Brussels 21.9.2010.
[3] Report on Equality between women and men 2010, European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit G.1. Manuscript completed in December 2009.
[4] The European Network Against Racism ENAR Fact Sheet 42, Gender and Migration 2010
[5] Study on the situation of women with disabilities in light of the UN Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (VC/2007/317). A Final Report for the DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities of the European Commission.
[6] Smith, M. ‘Analysis Note: Gender equality and recession’, EGGE, 2009.
[7] Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the European Commission’s Communication ‘Strategy for Equality between Women and Men 2010-2015, (COM (2010) 491, SEC (2010) 1079), Brussels 21.9.2010
[8] She Figures 2009. Statistics and Indicators on Gender Equality in Science. European Commission Directorate-General for Research Communication Unit. EUR 23856 EN.
[9] Roadmap: Reconciliation between work, family and private life (2011), EMPL G2, Type of initiative CWP. [10] European Quality of Life Survey 2007, European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
[11] Data and Information on Women’s Health in the European Union. European Communities, 2009, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Research Association Public Health Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
[12] Provisional figure, sourced from Eurostat, 10.02.11. Table reference: Gender pay gap in unadjusted form in % [tsiem040].
[13] Strategy for equality between women and men 2010-2015. European Commission. Brussels, 21.9.2010, COM(2010)
[14]Eurostat EU-25, referenced in Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the European Commission’s Communication ‘Strategy for Equality between Women and Men 2010-2015, (COM (2010) 491, SEC (2010) 1079), Brussels 21.9.2010.
[15] Flash Eurobarometer on Entrepreneurship 283 (2009).
[16] A academic staff (the highest grade/post at which research is normally conducted
[17] The life of women and men in Europe. A statistical portrait. 2008 edition, Eurostat statistical books.
[18] Bettio, F. and Verashchagina A (2009) Fiscal systems and female employment in Europe, EGGE – European Network of Experts on Employment and Gender Equality issues, Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini.
[19] Study on the situation of women with disabilities in light of the UN Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (VC/2007/317). A Final Report for the DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities of the European Commission; Bettio, F. and Verashchagina A (2009) Fiscal systems and female employment in Europe, EGGE – European Network of Experts on Employment and Gender Equality issues, Fondazione Giacomo Brodolini
[20] Labor Force Survey, quarterly data on employment rates by sex, age groups and nationality – comparison of employment rates for nationals and citizens of countries outside the EU-27
[21] Study on ‘Migrant women in the European labor force’ commissioned by the European Commission and completed in 2008
[22] Women’s poverty and social exclusion in the European Union at a time of recession . An Invisible Crisis? Oxfam International/European Women’s Lobby, March 2010 A Gender Works paper
[23] European Commission Consultation On Possible New EU Measures In The Area Of Paternity Leave
[24] Data base on women and men in decision-making.
[25] Women in European politics – time for action. European Commission, 2009.
[26] Database: Women and men in decision-making: highlights (Fourth quarter 2010)
[27] Business and finance - Largest quoted companies.
[28] Database: women and men in decision making. Background data: women in businesses.
[29] EWL, Unveiling the hidden data on domestic violence in the EU, 1999; Combating violence against women: Stocktaking study on the measures and actions taken in Council of Europe Member States, 2006
[30] Forty Ninth World Health Assembly Geneva, 20-15 May 2006 WHA49.25
Advisory Committee on equal opportunities for women and men Prevention of violence: a public health priority.
[31] Advisory Committee on equal opportunities for women and men. Opinion on an EU Strategy on Violence Against Women and Girls, 7 December 2010
[32] European Commission: Sexual harassment at the workplace in the European Union (Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1999)
[33] Dirie, Waris, Onze verborgen tranen, Amsterdam, Sirene, 2005. European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2009 on combating female genital mutilation in the EU (2008/2071(INI)).
[34] Penhale, B. (1999) Bruises on the soul: older women, domestic violence and elder abuse. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 11, 1-22. Advisory committee on equal opportunities for women and menA. Opinion on an EU Strategy on Violence Against Women and Girls, 7 December 2010
[35] Psytel, 2006 Daphne Project on the cost of domestic violence in Europe
[36] Recent study funded by the EU DAPHNE programme ‘Different Systems, similar outcomes? Tracking attrition in reported rape cases in eleven countries,’ European Briefing, Kelly, L & Lovett, J, April 2009, CWASU
[37] Global Media Monitoring project 2010. Who makes the news?, 2010
[38] Global Media Monitoring Project 2005, Who makes the news?, 2005
[39] Wierstra, R., Breasts, Butts, Balkenende, Hilversum, Bureau Beeldvorming en Diversiteit, 2003
[40] European Commission Advisory Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men. Opinion on “Breaking gender stereotypes in the media” January 2011
[41] Van Hellemont & Van Den Bulk, L’image des femmes et des hommes dans la publicité en Belgique, 2009, p. 16
[42] Media Awareness Network, Media and Girls
[43] Children Now, From Sidekick to Superwoman: TV’s Feminine Mystique, Report on the 1995 conference on Children and the Media, 1995,
[44] Media Awareness Network; International Federation of Journalists, Getting the balance right: gender equality in journalism, 2009
[45] Eurostat, 2010, Factsheet 50.
[46] Women make their way in Vancouver, 13 February 2010
[47] Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparing Firsthand Knowledge with Experience from the West, © 1996 College of Police and Security Studies, Slovenia.
[48] European survey on income and living conditions, EUSILC 2008
[49] European Medical Association, 2009
[50] Access to healthcare and long-term care Equal for women and men? European Commission, 2009
[51] Structure of Earning Survey, 2006
[52] Eurostat 2009

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lietuva
  • El. paštas: eige.sec@eige.europa.eu
  • Telefonas: +370 5 215 7444
  • Administracija: +370 5 215 7400
  • Užpildykite šią formą, jei norite susisiekti su mumis / mūsų vieta žemėlapyje

    Find us

    image of map

    Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Media enquiries

    • Georgie Bradley
    •  +370 6 982 7826
    • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

    EIGE in social media

    • Follow us on Twitter
    • Follow us on Facebook
    • Follow us on Youtube
    • Follow us on Linkedin
    EIGE logo
    Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
     

    © 2023 Europos lyčių lygybės institutas

    Help us improve

    Take me to top

    • Web Accessibility
    • Legal notices
    • Personal Data Protection
    • Cookies Policy
    • The UK on EIGE's website
    • Contact us
    • Login