• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Pereiti į pagrindinį turinį
  • Skip to footer
Europos lyčių lygybės institutas logoEuropos lyčių lygybės institutas
Paieška

Paieškos forma

Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
        • What is gender budgeting?
          • Introducing gender budgeting
          • Gender budgeting in women’s and men’s lived realities
          • What does gender budgeting involve in practice?
          • Gender budgeting in the EU Funds
            • Gender budgeting as a way of complying with EU legal requirements
            • Gender budgeting as a way of promoting accountability and transparency
            • Gender budgeting as a way of increasing participation in budget processes
            • Gender budgeting as a way of advancing gender equality
        • Why is gender budgeting important in the EU Funds?
          • Three reasons why gender budgeting is crucial in the EU Funds
        • How can we apply gender budgeting in the EU Funds? Practical tools and Member State examples
          • Tool 1: Connecting the EU Funds with the EU’s regulatory framework on gender equality
            • Legislative and regulatory basis for EU policies on gender equality
            • Concrete requirements for considering gender equality within the EU Funds
            • EU Funds’ enabling conditions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 2: Analysing gender inequalities and gender needs at the national and sub-national levels
            • Steps to assess and analyse gender inequalities and needs
            • Step 1. Collect information and disaggregated data on the target group
            • Step 2. Identify existing gender inequalities and their underlying causes
            • Step 3. Consult directly with the target groups
            • Step 4. Draw conclusions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 3: Operationalising gender equality in policy objectives and specific objectives/measures
            • Steps for operationalising gender equality in Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes
            • General guidance on operationalising gender equality when developing policy objectives, specific objectives and measures
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Partnership Agreements
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Operational Programmes
            • Examples of integrating gender equality as a horizontal principle in policy objectives and specific objectives
          • Tool 4: Coordination and complementarities between the EU Funds to advance work-life balance
            • Steps for enhancing coordination and complementarities between the funds
            • Step 1. Alignment with the EU’s strategic engagement goals for gender equality and national gender equality goals
            • Steps 2 and 3. Identifying and developing possible work-life balance interventions
            • Step 4. Following-up through the use of indicators within M&E systems
            • Fictional case study 1: reconciling paid work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 2: reconciling shift work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 3: balancing care for oneself and others
            • Fictional case study 4: reconciling care for children and older persons with shift work
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 5: Defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Steps for defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 6: Developing quantitative and qualitative indicators for advancing gender equality
            • Steps to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
            • ERDF and Cohesion Fund
            • ESF+
            • EMFF
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 7: Defining gender-sensitive project selection criteria
            • Steps to support gender-sensitive project development and selection
            • Checklist to guide the preparation of calls for project proposals
            • Checklist for project selection criteria
            • Supplementary tool 7.a: Gender-responsive agreements with project implementers
          • Tool 8: Tracking resource allocations for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Tool 9: Mainstreaming gender equality in project design
            • Steps to mainstream gender equality in project design
            • Step 1. Alignment with partnership agreements’ and Operational Programmes’ gender objectives and indicators
            • Step 2. Project development and application
            • Step 3. Project implementation
            • Step 4. Project assessment
          • Tool 10: Integrating a gender perspective in monitoring and evaluation processes
            • Steps to integrate a gender perspective in M&E processes
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 11: Reporting on resource spending for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Tracking expenditures for gender equality
            • Additional resources
          • References
          • Abbreviations
          • Acknowledgements
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
  • Pirmas
  • Gender mainstreaming
  • Toolkits
  • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
  • WHERE

Gender Equality in Academia and Research

PrintDownload as PDF
  • Back to toolkit page
  • WHAT
    • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
    • Terms and definitions
    • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
    • About the Gear Tool
  • WHY
    • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
    • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
    • Why change must be structural
    • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
  • HOW
    • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
      • Step 1: Getting started
      • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
      • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
      • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
      • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
      • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
    • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
      • Step 1: Getting started
      • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
      • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
      • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
      • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
      • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
    • GEAR action toolbox
      • Work-life balance and organisational culture
      • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
      • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
      • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
      • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
      • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
      • Data collection and monitoring
      • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
      • GEP development and implementation
      • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
    • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
    • Challenges & resistance
  • WHERE
    • Austria
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Croatia
    • Cyprus
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Estonia
    • Finland
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • Ireland
    • Italy
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • United Kingdom

    Germany

    Country: 
    Germany

    PROMOTING GENDER EQUALITY IN RESEARCH

    Legal framework

    In addition to general legal provisions on gender equality at federal and state level, there are specific legal provisions on gender equality in public research. 

    § 3 of the 2007 Framework Act for Higher Education (Hochschulrahmengesetz, HRG) obliges universities to promote gender equality and strive to eliminate existing inequalities. Compliance with this provision is a criterion for granting public funding to universities (HRG, § 5). HRG § 6 mandates evaluation of universities’ compliance with their gender equality-related obligations at regular intervals. HRG, § 37 (2) also states that universities must strive towards an “appropriate” representation of women and men in university bodies.

    The primary authority for higher education rests with the federal states. Although regulation of gender equality varies, recent years have seen a trend towards strengthening the legal framework for equality in universities. All higher education acts at State level include provisions on Equal Opportunities Commissioners or women’s representatives, whose  duties, rights, election/selection procedure, term in office and infrastructure differ by State. Some broader concrete measures can also be highlighted:

    • Cascade model: university management works to ensure that the proportion of women when filling academic qualification positions and professorships is at least the same as at the next-lowest qualification level . This model has been adopted by several States, with North Rhine-Westphalia making it mandatory;
    • Gender equality plans: universities create and adopt framework plans that work towards the implementation of equal opportunities for women and men in all status and employment groups, and reduce structural disadvantages;
    • Gender-sensitive job advertisements: some States, such as Baden- Wuerttemberg and Bremen, oblige universities to advertise jobs so as to appeal to women and men, regardless of origin, religion or sexual orientation.

    The Federal Equality Law (Bundesgleichstellungsgesetz) provides a set of rules on Equal Opportunities Commissioners in federal agencies that applies to non-university public research institutions[1] (§ 19-36). § 11 of the Law obliges non-university public research institutions to issue a gender equality plan.

    Policy framework

    In a so-called Implementation Agreement, within the framework of the Joint Science Conference (Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz, GWK) the federal and State governments have legally committed to supporting gender equality in their jointly funded research institutions and initiatives (Ausführungsvereinbarung zum GWK-Abkommen über die Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern bei der gemeinsamen Forschungsförderung, AV-Glei, § 1). The Agreement also commits them to working towards the elimination of gender-based discrimination. It contains specific provisions on recruitment procedures, career promotion and Gender Equality Officers. It stipulates that in cases where candidates are equally qualified, the candidate of the underrepresented sex will be preferred in recruitment and promotion procedures (with some exceptions) (AV-Glei, Anlage, § 4).

    The Pact for Research and Innovation (PFI)[2] is a research-funding initiative of the German federal and State governments. It is designed to give publicly funded non-university research institutions security through continuous budget increases. The PFI also establishes targets to advance gender equality in these institutions. In PFI 2011-2015, the institutions committed to following the cascade model, significantly increasing numbers of women researchers (especially in leadership positions), and considering the use of further incentives and sanctions. In May 2019, PFI 2021-2030 was agreed. The science organisations report on the achievement of the agreed research policy goals in regular monitoring reports published by the Joint Science Conference.

    One of the most prominent government initiatives to promote gender equality in higher education and research is the Federal Programme for Women Professors (Professorinnenprogramm[3]. Established in 2007, it is a joint programme of the federal government and the States’ governments. A twofold approach encourages the design and implementation of comprehensive gender equality strategies at German higher education institutes (HEIs) and increases the number and share of women professors. Within the framework of this programme, HEIs submit gender equality concepts (strategies with specific measures) for consideration. If a concept is positively assessed, the institution is granted funding for up to three professorships held by women for the course of five years.

    Other stimulatory initiatives

    The Federal Equality Foundation (Bundesstiftung Gleichstellung) is the latest development in nationwide stimuli for gender equality. Agreed in May 2021, it will be supported and monitored by the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. The purpose of the Foundation is to advance and accelerate equality of women and men. It aims to strengthen practical gender equality work by advising public administration, civil society, research and businesses on the development of solutions and their implementation. The Foundation will also act as a networking platform for these different actors, facilitating the transfer of knowledge.

    In 2008, the General Assembly of the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG[4]) established “Research‑Oriented Standards on Gender Equality”, consisting of structural and personal standards. Compliance with these standards was stipulated as “one of the key criteria for the approval of research networks in which member institutions are applicants”. Higher education and research institutions have set up gender equality concepts to comply with these standards. A core element of the personal standards is the cascade model, for example. The Foundation regularly updates and reports on implementation.

    The TOTAL E-QUALITY Award[5] is a well-established certificate, managed by TOTAL E-QUALITY Deutschland e.V. and based on a self-assessment instrument. Applicants from HEIs are asked to highlight gender equality initiatives in various areas of action (e.g. recruitment, career development, work-life balance, organisational development) and to provide sex-disaggregated data. Another widespread certificate is the family-friendly university audit (familiengerechte hochschule)[6]. The audit was initiated by the German Hertie Foundation and is implemented by its  subsidiary, berufundfamilie GmbH. Together with an auditor, participating universities determine their status and define a strategy to strengthen family-friendly work and study conditions.

    The National Pact for Women in mathematics, informatics, natural sciences and technology (MINT) Careers is a network of policymakers, researchers and media. It is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research and coordinated by the Competence Centre Technology-Diversity-Equal Opportunities (Kompetenzzentrum Technik-Diversity-Chancengleichheit e.V.[7]). The Pact seeks to support women’s access and advancement in MINT professions.

    The Kompetenzzentrum Technik-Diversity-Chancengleichheit e.V. organises a popular annual initiative – “Girls’ Day”. Since 2001, companies, businesses and universities throughout Germany have opened their doors to schoolgirls from 5th grade upwards on Girls’ Day. During their visits, girls learn about apprenticeship opportunities and university studies in IT, trades, natural sciences and technology. They also meet women role models in leadership positions in business and politics. Girls’ Day is designed to attract girls to fields in which women are underrepresented.

    The Contact Point Women into EU Research (FiF[8]) is part of the German network of National Contact Points (NCPs) and is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. It advises researchers in/from Germany on matters relating to gender and equal opportunities in the EU research framework programme, Horizon Europe. It offers seminars, workshops and lectures on EU research funding, initial information on funding opportunities and application procedures, and information on working as an expert for the EU.

    There are various charters and self-commitment initiatives. One example is the Charter Family in the University, where universities commit themselves to implementing measures that make their working environment more family-friendly.

    There are numerous stimulatory initiatives at State level, with over 35 listed in the Gesis Database[9]. Examples include:

    • Scientifica in Baden-Wuerttemberg: Scientifica is an information portal featuring ways to improve career opportunities for women in the sciences, especially science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM);
    • Berlin Equal Opportunity Programme: the programme supports young women researchers with different goals, including early successor appointments, qualification and professionalisation of women researchers and artists for a professorship, stabilisation of women's research careers in the post-doctoral phase, anchoring gender aspects in research and teaching, and qualification of women in the natural and technical sciences;
    • Dialogue Initiative Gender Equitable University Culture in Lower Saxony: Since 2014, the initiative has facilitated intensive cooperation in gender equality policy between universities and the Ministry of Science and Culture of Lower Saxony. It aims to break down structural and habitual barriers to women and men’s balanced participation and involvement in teaching, research and management.

    Key actors

    Almost all key players involved in Germany's gender equality policy system in academia and research regularly develop position and strategy papers and statements on gender equality.

    The Federal Ministry of Education and Research has launched programmes and initiatives that spurred efforts towards gender equality in research, notably the Federal Programme for Women Professors and the programme Frauen an die Spitze.

    The Joint Science Conference (Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz, GWK[10]) brings together all ministers and senators responsible for science, research and finance at federal and State level. This body decides on all questions related to research policy strategies and funding that affect both levels of government, and works towards coordinated approaches. The GWK publishes annual monitoring reports for the PFI, including recent changes in gender equality measures in research institutions.

    The Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the States (Kultusministerkonferenz[11]) aims to ensure coordination and cooperation between the States on issues related to research (and others) that fall within their competence.

    The Federal Conference of Women's and Gender Equality Representatives at Universities (bukof[12]) is a non-profit association that unites all professionals responsible for shaping the structure and culture of universities in Germany in a gender-equal way. In a 2019 statement, bukof called on all universities to jointly defend gender equality and gender policy achievements and goals, and to oppose anti-feminist positions.

    The DFG[13] is the largest research funding organisation in Europe. It has had a significant impact on gender equality-related efforts in higher education and research institutions, particularly through its Research‑Oriented Standards on Gender Equality. It also developed a freely accessible online toolbox that provides an overview of possible gender equality measures in research and teaching.

    The German Rectors' Conference (Hochschulrektorenkonferenz, HRK[14]) is an association of State and State-recognised universities and represents their interest in politics and society. In its recent position paper of 2019, the HRK recommends various measures to increase the proportion of women in leadership positions in research.

    The Council of Science and Humanities (Wissenschaftsrat[15]) advises the federal and State governments on the development of the higher education and research system and higher education and research institutions.

    Policymakers and researchers can draw on expertise and services provided by competence centres specialising in gender equality (measures) in higher education and research. These include the Centre of Excellence Women and Science (CEWS) and the Competence Centre Technology-Diversity-Equal Opportunities (Kompetenzzentrum Technik-Diversity-Chancengleichheit e.V.).

    INITIATIVES FOR GENDER EQUALITY BY RESEARCH PERFORMING ORGANISATIONS

    Germany has seen a large number of initiatives promoting gender equality in research organisations. This is likely linked to the numbers of gender equality plans (GEPs) resulting from legal obligations, as well as incentives provided by policy and stimulatory initiatives.

    The Toolbox for the DFG’s Research-Oriented Standards provides a selection of gender equality measures implemented in German higher education and research institutions. Some of these are outlined below, covering the six dimensions or topics of practices defined by the DFG: 

    1. Staff/early career researchers: plan m Mentoring for women scientists and engineers, Bremen University;
    2. Work-life balance: studying with a child[16], Osnabrück University;
    3. Research/academic culture: Clara von Simson Award, Berlin University of Technology;
    4. Organisational development: Women scientists to the top (Wissenschaftlerinnen an die Spitze), Berlin University of Technology;
    5. Gender in research and academia: Interdisciplinary Symposium for Women Engineers and Scientists (ISINA), Chemnitz University of Technology;
    6. Quality assurance: Gender Equality and Diversity Action Plans (GEDAPS), Goethe University Frankfurt am Main.

    All public HEIs and non-university public research institutions are legally obliged to issue a GEP. The 2021 “She Figures” report by the European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation showed that 89 % of German higher education institutions and 62 % of public research organisations have taken actions or measures towards gender equality. While this study might not be representative of research overall, it nevertheless shows a strong tendency towards the diffusion of measures promoting gender equality in R&I (including GEPs) in Germany.

    There is no legal obligation to make GEPs publicly available and the required characteristics for HEIs differ between German States. Some laws require GEPs at central and decentralised (faculty, etc.) level, while others only refer to a central plan. GEPs may (or may not) contain: an analysis of gender relations at the institution, a specific objective of the plan and/or individual measures, a budget assigned to each measure, target groups of measures, the timeframe for the implementation of each measure, and/or agents responsible for implementation. In many HEIs, the GEP responds to the requirements of the DFG Research-Oriented Standards on Gender Equality or those of the Federal Programme for Women Professors.

    Several German research organisations are involved in EU-funded structural change projects. The most recent projects are:

    • ACT - TU Berlin and the Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY);
    • GENERA - DESY;
    • Baltic Gender - Kiel University, Kiel University of Applied Sciences, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel and Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde;
    • Equal4Europe - ESMT Berlin;
    • EFFORTI - Fraunhofer Society;
    • GenderAction - DLR Project Management Agency (Contact Point Women into EU Research);
    • Change! - RWTH Aachen und Fraunhofer Society;
    • LeTSGEPs - RWTH Aachen and Max Planck Society;
    • GEECCO – GESIS;
    • SPEAR - RWTH Aachen;
    • TINNGO - TU Ilmenau.

    RELEVANT EXAMPLES OF PRACTICES

    Spokesperson budget, DFG

    In order to promote the visibility of women in decision-making positions, the Joint Committee of the DFG decided to introduce a special budget for DFG-funded research networks. Since the beginning of 2021, networks whose spokesperson/coordinator belongs to an underrepresented gender at leadership level can apply for additional, uncommitted funding of EUR 80,000 per funding year. The DFG regularly publishes information on underrepresented genders at project management level.

    Gender inclusion funding should be used for individual and subject/project-related activities that serve to facilitate the spokesperson’s role. This applies to coordinators in priority programmes. Funding can be used for research or administrative support staff, to fund a sabbatical for the spokesperson, or for a partial temporary substitute clinician position.

    Strategy for Equal Opportunities, University of Cologne

    The University of Cologne’s Strategy for Equal Opportunities was co-created as part of a two-year dialogue with student and employee representatives. It includes specific action plans against all grounds of discrimination, which are currently being implemented. The thematically varied strategy follows different principles: (1) empowerment: participatory development of the strategy; (2) evidence-based: current research is taken into account when developing measures; (3) intersectionality; and (4) sustainability (continuous monitoring). The Strategy has been in place since 2018 and is unusual because of its participatory and reflective approach that views equal opportunity as a responsibility of all employees and students.

    BestChance, Fraunhofer Society

    In 2019, the Fraunhofer Society created the stimulus “BestChance” to raise awareness of gender equality measures that can be implemented in research organisations. Employees of the different institutes of the Fraunhofer Society can nominate and propose measures, teams, or a specific project or person in their institutes, and the winners receive EUR 3,000 prize money. BestChance increases the visibility of effective measures, rewards outstanding commitment to gender equality, and encourages imitation.

    Footnotes

    [1] Including the largest German research organisations, such as the Helmholtz Association, the Fraunhofer Society, the Max Planck Society and the Leibniz Association.

    [2] https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/de/forschung/das-wissenschaftssystem/pakt-fuer-...

    [3] https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/de/forschung/chancengerechtigkeit-und-vielfalt-...

    [4] https://www.dfg.de/

    [5] https://www.total-e-quality.de/

    [6] https://www.berufundfamilie.de/auditierung-unternehmen-institutionen-hoc...

    [7] https://www.kompetenzz.de/

    [8] https://www.horizont2020.de/beratung-fif.htm

    [9] https://www.gesis.org/starq/infoangebote/bund-und-laendermassnahmen

    [10] https://www.gwk-bonn.de/en/

    [11] https://www.kmk.org/kmk/information-in-english.html

    [12] https://bukof.de/

    [13] https://www.dfg.de/

    [14] https://www.hrk.de/hrk-at-a-glance/

    [15] https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/DE/Home/home_node.html

    [16] https://www.mit-kind-studieren.de/index.php?id=startseite

    • France

    Share:

    Useful links

    • Who we are
    • Recruitment
    • News 
    • Events

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

    General enquiries

    • Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lietuva
    • El. paštas: eige.sec@eige.europa.eu
    • Telefonas: +370 5 215 7444
    • Administracija: +370 5 215 7400
    • Užpildykite šią formą, jei norite susisiekti su mumis / mūsų vieta žemėlapyje

      Find us

      image of map

      Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

      Media enquiries

      • Georgie Bradley
      •  +370 6 982 7826
      • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

      EIGE in social media

      • Follow us on Twitter
      • Follow us on Facebook
      • Follow us on Youtube
      • Follow us on Linkedin
      EIGE logo
      Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
       

      © 2023 Europos lyčių lygybės institutas

      Help us improve

      Take me to top

      • Web Accessibility
      • Legal notices
      • Personal Data Protection
      • Cookies Policy
      • The UK on EIGE's website
      • Contact us
      • Login