• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to current category navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Pereiti į pagrindinį turinį
  • Skip to footer

Gender mainstreaming

  • What is Gender mainstreaming
    • Policy cycle
  • Institutions and structures
    • European Union
    • EU Member States
    • Stakeholders
    • International organizations
  • Policy areas
    • Agriculture and rural development
      • Policy cycle
    • Culture
      • Policy cycle
    • Digital agenda
      • Policy cycle
    • Economic and financial affairs
      • #3 Steps Forward
        • How can you make a difference?
      • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
      • Policy cycle
    • Education
      • Policy cycle
    • Employment
      • Policy cycle
      • Structures
    • Energy
      • Policy cycle
    • Entrepreneurship
      • Policy cycle
    • Environment and climate change
      • Policy cycle
    • Health
      • Policy cycle
    • Justice
      • Policy cycle
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
      • Policy cycle
    • Migration
      • Policy cycle
    • Poverty
      • Policy cycle
    • Regional policy
      • Policy cycle
    • Research
      • Policy cycle
    • Security
      • Policy cycle
    • Sport
      • Policy cycle
    • Tourism
      • Policy cycle
    • Transport
      • Policy cycle
    • Youth
      • Policy cycle
  • Toolkits
    • Gender Equality Training
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Gender Equality Training
      • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
      • Who should use Gender Equality Training
      • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Assess the needs
          • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
          • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
          • 4. Write good terms of reference
          • 5. Select a trainer
        • Implementation phase
          • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
          • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
          • 8. Invite others to join in
          • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
          • 11. Assess long-term impacts
          • 12. Give space and support others
      • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Equality Training in the EU
      • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
      • More resources on Gender Equality Training
      • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
    • Gender Impact Assessment
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Gender Impact Assessment
      • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
      • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
      • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
      • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
        • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
        • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
        • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
        • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
        • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
      • Following up on gender impact assessment
      • General considerations
      • Examples from the EU
        • European Union
          • European Commission
        • National level
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Denmark
          • Finland
          • Sweden
        • Regional level
          • Basque country
          • Catalonia
        • Local level
          • Lower Saxony
          • Swedish municipalities
    • Institutional Transformation
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Institutional Transformation
        • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
        • Gender organisations
        • Types of institutions
        • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
        • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
      • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
        • Motivation model
      • Who the guide is for
      • Guide to Institutional Transformation
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
          • 2. Allocating resources
          • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
          • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
        • Implementation phase
          • 5. Establishing a support structure
          • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
          • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
          • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
          • 9. Developing gender equality competence
          • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
          • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
          • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
      • Dealing with resistance
        • Discourse level
        • Individual level
        • Organisational level
        • Statements and reactions
      • Checklist: Key questions for change
      • Examples from the EU
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Strengthening accountability
          • 2. Allocating resources
          • 3. Organisational analysis
          • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
        • Implementation phase
          • 5. Establishing a support structure
          • 6. Setting objectives
          • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
          • 8. Introducing methods and tools
          • 9. Developing Competence
          • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
          • 11. Launching action plans
          • 12. Promoting within an organisation
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
    • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
      • Back to toolkit page
      • WHAT
        • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
        • Terms and definitions
        • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
        • About the Gear Tool
      • WHY
        • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
        • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
        • Why change must be structural
        • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
      • HOW
        • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
          • Step 1: Getting started
          • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
          • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
        • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
          • Step 1: Getting started
          • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
          • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
        • GEAR action toolbox
          • Work-life balance and organisational culture
          • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
          • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
          • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
          • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
          • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
          • Data collection and monitoring
          • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
          • GEP development and implementation
          • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
        • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
        • Challenges & resistance
      • WHERE
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czechia
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Netherlands
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • United Kingdom
    • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is the tool for?
      • Who is the tool for?
      • How to use the tool
      • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
        • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
          • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
          • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
        • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
          • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
          • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
        • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
          • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
          • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
        • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
          • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
          • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
        • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
          • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
          • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
      • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
      • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
        • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
        • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
        • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
        • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
        • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
      • Glossary of terms
      • References and resources
    • Gender Budgeting
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Who is this toolkit for?
      • What is gender budgeting?
        • Introducing gender budgeting
        • Gender budgeting in women’s and men’s lived realities
        • What does gender budgeting involve in practice?
        • Gender budgeting in the EU Funds
          • Gender budgeting as a way of complying with EU legal requirements
          • Gender budgeting as a way of promoting accountability and transparency
          • Gender budgeting as a way of increasing participation in budget processes
          • Gender budgeting as a way of advancing gender equality
      • Why is gender budgeting important in the EU Funds?
        • Three reasons why gender budgeting is crucial in the EU Funds
      • How can we apply gender budgeting in the EU Funds? Practical tools and Member State examples
        • Tool 1: Connecting the EU Funds with the EU’s regulatory framework on gender equality
          • Legislative and regulatory basis for EU policies on gender equality
          • Concrete requirements for considering gender equality within the EU Funds
          • EU Funds’ enabling conditions
          • Additional resources
        • Tool 2: Analysing gender inequalities and gender needs at the national and sub-national levels
          • Steps to assess and analyse gender inequalities and needs
          • Step 1. Collect information and disaggregated data on the target group
          • Step 2. Identify existing gender inequalities and their underlying causes
          • Step 3. Consult directly with the target groups
          • Step 4. Draw conclusions
          • Additional resources
        • Tool 3: Operationalising gender equality in policy objectives and specific objectives/measures
          • Steps for operationalising gender equality in Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes
          • General guidance on operationalising gender equality when developing policy objectives, specific objectives and measures
          • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Partnership Agreements
          • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Operational Programmes
          • Examples of integrating gender equality as a horizontal principle in policy objectives and specific objectives
        • Tool 4: Coordination and complementarities between the EU Funds to advance work-life balance
          • Steps for enhancing coordination and complementarities between the funds
          • Step 1. Alignment with the EU’s strategic engagement goals for gender equality and national gender equality goals
          • Steps 2 and 3. Identifying and developing possible work-life balance interventions
          • Step 4. Following-up through the use of indicators within M&E systems
          • Fictional case study 1: reconciling paid work and childcare
          • Fictional case study 2: reconciling shift work and childcare
          • Fictional case study 3: balancing care for oneself and others
          • Fictional case study 4: reconciling care for children and older persons with shift work
          • Additional resources
        • Tool 5: Defining partnerships and multi-level governance
          • Steps for defining partnerships and multi-level governance
          • Additional resources
        • Tool 6: Developing quantitative and qualitative indicators for advancing gender equality
          • Steps to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
          • ERDF and Cohesion Fund
          • ESF+
          • EMFF
          • Additional resources
        • Tool 7: Defining gender-sensitive project selection criteria
          • Steps to support gender-sensitive project development and selection
          • Checklist to guide the preparation of calls for project proposals
          • Checklist for project selection criteria
          • Supplementary tool 7.a: Gender-responsive agreements with project implementers
        • Tool 8: Tracking resource allocations for gender equality in the EU Funds
          • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
          • The tracking system
          • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
          • Step 1: Ex ante approach
          • Step 2: Ex post approach
          • Examples of Step 2a
          • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
          • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
        • Tool 9: Mainstreaming gender equality in project design
          • Steps to mainstream gender equality in project design
          • Step 1. Alignment with partnership agreements’ and Operational Programmes’ gender objectives and indicators
          • Step 2. Project development and application
          • Step 3. Project implementation
          • Step 4. Project assessment
        • Tool 10: Integrating a gender perspective in monitoring and evaluation processes
          • Steps to integrate a gender perspective in M&E processes
          • Additional resources
        • Tool 11: Reporting on resource spending for gender equality in the EU Funds
          • Tracking expenditures for gender equality
          • Additional resources
      • Resources
        • References
        • Abbreviations
        • Acknowledgements
    • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Who is this toolkit for?
        • Guiding you through the toolkit
      • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
        • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
        • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
      • Why is gender-responsive public procurement important?
        • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
        • Why was this toolkit produced
      • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
        • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
        • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
        • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
        • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
        • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
        • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
        • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
        • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
      • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
        • Pre-procurement stage
          • Needs assessment
          • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
          • Preliminary market consultation
          • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
          • Defining the subject matter of the contract
          • Choosing the procedure
          • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
          • Dividing the contract into lots
          • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
          • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
          • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
          • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
          • Reserved contracts
          • Preparing tender documents
        • Procurement stage
          • Exclusion grounds
          • Selection criteria
          • Technical specifications
          • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
          • Award criteria
          • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
          • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
          • Use of labels/certifications
        • Post-procurement stage
          • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
          • Subcontracting
          • Monitoring
          • Reporting
          • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
      • References
      • Additional resources
  • Methods and tools
    • Browse
    • About EIGE's methods and tools
    • Gender analysis
    • Gender audit
    • Gender awareness-raising
    • Gender budgeting
    • Gender impact assessment
    • Gender equality training
    • Gender-responsive evaluation
    • Gender statistics and indicators
    • Gender monitoring
    • Gender planning
    • Gender-responsive public procurement
    • Gender stakeholder consultation
    • Sex-disaggregated data
    • Institutional transformation
    • Examples of methods and tools
    • Resources
  • Good practices
    • Browse
    • About good practices
    • EIGE’s approach to good practices
  • Country specific information
    • Belgium
      • Overview
    • Bulgaria
      • Overview
    • Czechia
      • Overview
    • Denmark
      • Overview
    • Germany
      • Overview
    • Estonia
      • Overview
    • Ireland
      • Overview
    • Greece
      • Overview
    • Spain
      • Overview
    • France
      • Overview
    • Croatia
      • Overview
    • Italy
      • Overview
    • Cyprus
      • Overview
    • Latvia
      • Overview
    • Lithuania
      • Overview
    • Luxembourg
      • Overview
    • Hungary
      • Overview
    • Malta
      • Overview
    • Netherlands
      • Overview
    • Austria
      • Overview
    • Poland
      • Overview
    • Portugal
      • Overview
    • Romania
      • Overview
    • Slovenia
      • Overview
    • Slovakia
      • Overview
    • Finland
      • Overview
    • Sweden
      • Overview
  • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
  • Concepts and definitions
  • Power Up conference 2019
Europos lyčių lygybės institutas logoEuropos lyčių lygybės institutas
Paieška

Paieškos forma

Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
        • What is gender budgeting?
          • Introducing gender budgeting
          • Gender budgeting in women’s and men’s lived realities
          • What does gender budgeting involve in practice?
          • Gender budgeting in the EU Funds
            • Gender budgeting as a way of complying with EU legal requirements
            • Gender budgeting as a way of promoting accountability and transparency
            • Gender budgeting as a way of increasing participation in budget processes
            • Gender budgeting as a way of advancing gender equality
        • Why is gender budgeting important in the EU Funds?
          • Three reasons why gender budgeting is crucial in the EU Funds
        • How can we apply gender budgeting in the EU Funds? Practical tools and Member State examples
          • Tool 1: Connecting the EU Funds with the EU’s regulatory framework on gender equality
            • Legislative and regulatory basis for EU policies on gender equality
            • Concrete requirements for considering gender equality within the EU Funds
            • EU Funds’ enabling conditions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 2: Analysing gender inequalities and gender needs at the national and sub-national levels
            • Steps to assess and analyse gender inequalities and needs
            • Step 1. Collect information and disaggregated data on the target group
            • Step 2. Identify existing gender inequalities and their underlying causes
            • Step 3. Consult directly with the target groups
            • Step 4. Draw conclusions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 3: Operationalising gender equality in policy objectives and specific objectives/measures
            • Steps for operationalising gender equality in Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes
            • General guidance on operationalising gender equality when developing policy objectives, specific objectives and measures
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Partnership Agreements
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Operational Programmes
            • Examples of integrating gender equality as a horizontal principle in policy objectives and specific objectives
          • Tool 4: Coordination and complementarities between the EU Funds to advance work-life balance
            • Steps for enhancing coordination and complementarities between the funds
            • Step 1. Alignment with the EU’s strategic engagement goals for gender equality and national gender equality goals
            • Steps 2 and 3. Identifying and developing possible work-life balance interventions
            • Step 4. Following-up through the use of indicators within M&E systems
            • Fictional case study 1: reconciling paid work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 2: reconciling shift work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 3: balancing care for oneself and others
            • Fictional case study 4: reconciling care for children and older persons with shift work
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 5: Defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Steps for defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 6: Developing quantitative and qualitative indicators for advancing gender equality
            • Steps to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
            • ERDF and Cohesion Fund
            • ESF+
            • EMFF
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 7: Defining gender-sensitive project selection criteria
            • Steps to support gender-sensitive project development and selection
            • Checklist to guide the preparation of calls for project proposals
            • Checklist for project selection criteria
            • Supplementary tool 7.a: Gender-responsive agreements with project implementers
          • Tool 8: Tracking resource allocations for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Tool 9: Mainstreaming gender equality in project design
            • Steps to mainstream gender equality in project design
            • Step 1. Alignment with partnership agreements’ and Operational Programmes’ gender objectives and indicators
            • Step 2. Project development and application
            • Step 3. Project implementation
            • Step 4. Project assessment
          • Tool 10: Integrating a gender perspective in monitoring and evaluation processes
            • Steps to integrate a gender perspective in M&E processes
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 11: Reporting on resource spending for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Tracking expenditures for gender equality
            • Additional resources
          • References
          • Abbreviations
          • Acknowledgements
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
Toggle sidebar menu
  • Pirmas
  • Gender mainstreaming
  • Institutions and structures

EU Member States

PrintDownload as PDF
This page makes a reference to the United Kingdom as a member of the European Union. It was published before the UK's withdrawal from the European Union on the 31 January 2020. 

Governmental gender equality bodies

A governmental gender equality body is a governmental body whose purpose is to design, coordinate and implement government policies for gender equality and is normally located in the government hierarchy. The existence and permanence of such a structure is a major indicator of the governmental responsibility in promoting gender equality. The governmental gender equality body should be located at the highest possible level of government, and the responsibility for promoting gender equality policies should be vested at the highest possible level of government, such as the level of a cabinet minister.

Type of governmental body at the national/federal level

National bodies for gender equality have been set up in each Member State to coordinate, implement, monitor and evaluate the gender-equality policies defined at governmental and/or ministerial level. They may also be involved in policymaking; providing expertise, advice and recommendations regarding policies and legal initiatives; elaborating studies that support policymaking; promoting awareness-raising initiatives; cooperating with civil society, etc.

The gender equality central structure of a Member State may have the form of either a department/division/unit within the ministry in charge of gender equality, or an independent/semi-independent body/agency/service usually overseen by the ministry. The ministry in charge of the gender-equality policy area may vary across the Member States. Currently, only one country has a ministry specifically devoted to women’s rights (LU), while more often ministries combine this topic with other policies (AT, DK, DE, FR, SI, ES). In most other cases, the policy area of gender equality is under the oversight of ministries dedicated to social policies – such as labour, employment, social affairs, health, welfare, social inclusion and family affairs (BG, EE, FI, LT, LV, MT, RO, SK, SE). Exceptionally, gender equality is located within other policy areas like education (IE, NL, UK), justice (CY), interior affairs (EL), finance (BE) [1] and human resources (HU), or is immediately under the responsibility of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers or the Prime Minister (CZ, HR, IT, PL, PT).

Governmental bodies responsible for gender equality
Country Governmental Body
Within the ministerial structure Independent or semi-independent
AT Department for Gender Equality policies and legal matters (Directorate for Women and Equality, within the Federal Minister for Education and Women’s Affairs)  
BE   Federal Institute for Equality between Women and Men[1]
BG Equal Opportunities, Anti-Discrimination and Social Benefit Department (Policy for People with Disabilities, Equal Opportunities and Social Benefits Directorate, within the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy)  
HR   Government Office for Gender Equality
CZ Gender Equality Unit  
CY   National Machinery for Women’s Rights
DK Department of Gender Equality  
EE Gender Equality Department  
FI Gender Equality Unit  
FR  

Women’s Rights and Gender Equality Service

(General Directorate for Social Cohesion, within the Ministry of Social Affairs, Health and Women’s Rights)

DE Gender Equality Department  
EL   General Secretariat for Gender Equality
HU Departmental Unit for Population, Family Affairs and Gender Equality  
IE

Gender Equality Division

(Department of Justice and Equality)

 
IT Department for Equal Opportunities (Presidency of the Council of Ministers)  
LV Department of Development and Planning of Social Policy  
LT Equality between Women and Men Division  
LU Ministry of Equal Opportunities  
MT   National Commission for the Promotion of Equality
NL Directorate for Emancipation  
PL Government Plenipotentiary for Equal Treatment (Office of the Prime Minister)  
PT   Commission for Citizenship and Gender Equality (Presidency of the Council of Ministers)
RO Directorate for Equal Opportunities between Women and Men  
SK   Department for Gender Equality and Equal Opportunity
SI Equal Opportunities and European Coordination Service  
ES   General Directorate of Equal Opportunities (Secretariat for Social Services and Equality, Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality)
SE Gender Equality Unit (Ministry of Family Affairs and Social Services)  
UK   Government Equalities Office (Department of Education)

Read more about these countries


[1]The Federal Institute for Equality between Women and Men is a semi-independent body, falling under the control of the minister/secretary of state in charge of gender-equality policies when it comes to more administrative tasks, but autonomous when it comes to legal action or when it takes the initiative to advise the minister and other public authorities. Currently, the minister in charge of gender-equality policies is the Secretary of State in charge of Fight against Poverty, Equal Opportunities, Disabled Persons, Urban Policy, Scientific Policy, assistant to the Minister of Finance.

[*] The information provided in this page was last updated in 2015

Position of the body in the governmental hierarchy

The position of the structure in the governmental hierarchy varies. It may be located at the highest level – when it forms a ministry (LU) – or it may be overseen by the central department of the government – notably the Council of Ministers or the Prime Minister’s Office (CZ, HR, IT, PT, PL). Alternatively, it may be a department in a ministry, above which there is the minister or a secretary general (DK, EE, DE, IE, NL, RO, SK, SE, UK, CY, EL, SI). Often, the gender-equality body is a unit in a department and is thereby located at the intermediate level in a ministry (AT, BU, CZ, ES, FI, HU, LT, LV, FR). Lastly, in some countries it is an independent body outside the ministerial structures (BE, MT).

Hierarchical location of the gender equality central structures in 2015

Level of responsibility for promoting gender equality

The responsibility to promote and advance gender equality lies with govern­ments of the Member States. According to the BPfA, the responsibility for promoting gender equality policies should be vested at the highest possible level of government, such as the level of a cabinet minister. However, approaches differ regarding where to place the mandate of this policy area. Besides the existence of ministries that make reference to the policy area of gender equality in their designation, most countries have a minister or state secretary responsible for promoting gender equality.

Ministers responsible for gender equality
Country Minister responsible for gender equality
AT Federal Minister for Education and Women’s Affairs
BE Secretary of State in charge of Fight against Poverty, Equal Opportunities, Disabled Persons, Urban Policy, Scientific Policy, assistant to the Minister of Finance
BG Minister of Labour and Social Policy
HR  
CZ Office of the Government
CY Minister of Jus­tice and Public Order
DK Minister for Gender Equality
EE Minister of Social Affairs
FI Minister of Social Affairs and Health
FR Minister for Social Affairs, Health and Women’s Rights
DE Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth
EL Minister of Interior
HU Ministry of Human Resources
IE Minister for Justice and Equality
IT  
LV Minister of Welfare
LT Minister of Social Security and Labour
LU Minister for Equal Opportunities
MT Minister for Justice, Dialogue and the Family
NL Minister of Education, Culture and Science
PL  
PT Secretary of State for Parliamentary Affairs and Equality, Presidency of the Council of Ministers
RO Ministry of Labour, Family, Social Protection and Elderly Persons
SK Minister of Labour, Social Affairs and the Family
SI Minister of Labour, Family, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities
ES Secretary of State for Social Services and Equality
SE Minister of Family Affairs and Social Services
UK Minister for Women and Equalities

[*] The information provided in this page was last updated in 2015

Legal and policy framework for gender mainstreaming at the national level

A successful implementation of the gender mainstreaming strategy requires well formulated gender mainstreaming objectives and targets embedded in a supportive legal and political framework, as well as a clear implementation Strategy/Plan.

Legal basis for gender mainstreaming

In many Member States the political commit­ment to gender mainstreaming is a legal obligation, either contextualised in the national gender equality legislation (DK, DE, EE, FR, HR, RO, SI, FI, SE, UK), or in a separate law on gender mainstreaming (BE, ES). In some countries (AT, DE, PT), the basis for implementing gender mainstreaming is provided by Resolutions of the Council of Ministers.

Gender mainstreaming contextualised in:
Country National gender equality legislation A separate law on gender mainstreaming Other
AT     Five Resolutions of the Council of Ministers (2000–2010)
BE   Gender Mainstreaming Law (2007)  
DE Federal Equality Act of 2001   Cabinet Resolution of 23 June 1999

Common Rules of Procedure of the Federal Ministries (2000)

DK Gender Equality Act    
EE Gender Equality Act    
ES   Law 3/2007 on the Effective Equality on Men and Women  
FI Act on Equality between Women and Men    
FR Act on Equality between Men and Women (2014)    
HR Gender Equality Act    
IT National Code for Equal Opportunities (2006)    
RO Law No. 202/2002 Regarding the Equal Opportunities of Women and Men    
SE Equality Policy Bill (2006)    
SI Act on Equal Opportunities    
UK Equality Act (2010)    

[*] The information provided in this page was last updated in 2015

National Strategies/Action Plans for gender mainstreaming

Most countries (BG, CZ, DK, EE, IE, EL,ES, FI, FR, HR, CY, LV, LT, LU, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SI, SK, FI, SE, UK) include gender mainstreaming references in their national strategies and/or action plans for gender equality, while three Member States (BE, DK, SE) have national strategies and/or action plans specifically dedicated to gender mainstreaming.

Country Gender equality Strategies/Plans with gender mainstreaming references Specific Strategies/Plans for gender mainstreaming
BE   2012–2014 Federal Action Plan for Gender Mainstreaming
BG National Strategy for Promotion of Gender Equality  
CY National Action Plan on Equality between Women and Men (2007–2013)  
CZ National Strategy: Priorities and Policies of the Government in the Promotion of Equality for Women and Men
National gender-equality plans
 
DK Gender-equality action plans National Gender Mainstreaming Strategy (2013)

National Gender Mainstreaming Action Plans

EE Promotion of Gender Equality Programme (2008–2010), (2011–2013)  
EL National Programme for Substantive Gender Equality (2010)  
ES Plans for Equal Opportunities between Men and Women  
FI Government Action Plan for Gender Equality (2012–2015)  
FR Inter-ministerial action plans (serving as a national strategy)

Gender-equality action plans in each ministry

 
HR National Policy for Gender Equality (2011–2015)  
HU National Strategy for the Promotion of Gender Equality (2010–2021)

Action plans foreseen but not implemented

 
IE National Women’s Strategy (2007–2016)  
LT National programmes on equal opportunities for women and men

Action plans for the implementation of national programmes

 
LU National Action Plan on Equality between Women and Men

Action plans for the implementation of the national action plan

 
LV Action plans for implementation of gender equality  
NL Policy letter to Parliament (National emancipation policy framework)  
PL National Action Plan for Equal Treatment 2013-2016  
RO National strategy for equal opportunities between women and men (2010–2012)  
SE National Strategy ‘The direction of gender-equality politics’ (2011–2014) Strategy for the work on gender mainstreaming in the government offices

Action plans on gender mainstreaming in each ministry

SI National programme for equal opportunities

Periodical plans for the implementation of the national programme

 
SK National Strategy for Gender Equality (2009-2013)

Action plan for the implementation of the national strategy

 
UK Government’s Equality Strategy (2010)  

[*] The information provided in this page was last updated in 2015

Structures for gender mainstreaming at the ministerial level

Implementing gender mainstreaming requires structures of governmental bodies and officials responsible for gender mainstreaming. Such structures might be units/departments/working groups specifically dedicated to gender mainstreaming within each ministry, gender focal points in the ministries (contact persons for gender mainstreaming) and/or an inter‑ministerial group (a coordinating body or a network of contact persons).

Specific structures for gender mainstreaming at the ministerial level

Nine countries have created structures (units, departments or working groups) specifically dedicated to gender mainstreaming at ministerial level (AT, FI, ES, LU, DE, DK, BE, EE, FR, PL). In Finland, each ministry has an operational gender-equality working group that coordinates, implements and monitors gender mainstreaming within its respective policy areas. Austria presents a similar approach with some ministries having constituted gender-mainstreaming working groups, such as the Federal Ministry for Women and Civil Service. In Germany, gender-equality structures are in place both at federal and local level: some ministries have units dedicated to gender-equality issues. Luxembourg and Spain have institutionalised by law the creation of units dedicated to mainstreaming gender equality in each ministry. In Luxembourg, since 2005, gender-competence cells have been put in place and are accountable for internally implementing gender-equality policies within the policy areas of each ministry. In 2007 Spain established gender units in each ministry, responsible for collecting sex-disaggregated statistics, conducting studies, providing advice on promoting gender equality, fostering gender knowledge and gender training, and monitoring the implementation of the equality law. In Denmark, a specific department dedicated to gender equality and gender mainstreaming has been instituted within the Ministry for Gender Equality; from 2001 to 2013, there was also a steering committee composed of high-level representatives from each ministry responsible for ensuring the implementation of the national gender-mainstreaming strategy and the integration of gender-equality concerns at policy level, while a group of contact persons (one or two civil servants per ministry) was in charge of implementing the gender-mainstreaming policy measures decided by the steering committee. Analogously, Belgium has created a specific unit within the Federal Institute for the Equality of Women and Men on gender mainstreaming: their role is to initiate, coordinate and coach the gender-mainstreaming process in all federal ministry departments. Estonia and France have assigned this responsibility to staff members. In Estonia, one of the staff members of the Gender Equality Department at the Ministry of Social Affairs is specifically responsible for gender mainstreaming. In France, each ministry has had appointed high-ranked public servants for gender equality since June 2012, under the coordination of the Ministry of Women’s Rights. Their role is to implement a mainstreaming approach and to ensure that gender-equality legislation is fully implemented, as well as to design gender-equality plans for their respective policy areas. In Poland, some ministries have units dedicated specifically to gender-equality issues (i.e. Ministry of Labor and Social Policy).

Read more about these countries

Gender focal points and Inter-ministerial working groups

Gender focal points are generally in charge of ensuring the implementation of the ministries’ gender equality and/or gender mainstreaming policy measures, and/or to monitor national gender-equality laws and policies. The number of representatives per ministry and/or public institution varies from country to country. This also applies to the amount of time they are required to dedicate to fulfilling their responsibilities, as the work related to this function is often combined with other responsibilities. Ten countries (BE, HR, CY, CZ, DK, FR, DE, PL, PT, SE, LT) have appointed gender focal points at ministerial level, designated as, for example, equal opportunity commissioners, counsellors for equality, ministerial representatives, ministry gender-mainstreaming coordinators, gender-equality focal points, and gender equality coordinators.

Both the BPfA and Indicator 3 of the Council of the European Union make explicit reference to the need for an inter-ministerial coordination structure to carry out the gender-mainstreaming mandate. Fourteen Member States (AT, BE, CY, DE, FI, LU, PT, SE, FR, EE, LT, ES, UK, DK) have a structure in compliance with such recommendations. In Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Germany, Luxemburg, Poland, Portugal and Sweden the ministerial gender representatives form an inter-ministerial group with the mandate to implement gender-equality and/or gender-mainstreaming measures within the ministry they represent. In France, the ministers themselves form the inter-ministerial group. In Estonia, Lithuania, Spain and the UK, the ministerial representatives are appointed to attend inter-ministerial meetings to design, coordinate, monitor and/or provide recommendations on governmental gender-equality and/or gender-mainstreaming policies. In Denmark, the inter-ministerial structure acts as a forum where the ministries’ employees can gain knowledge and exchange experiences on gender mainstreaming; similarly, in Finland, the network of gender-equality working groups provides a forum for sharing experience and good practice and identifying and discussing problems. In Poland, a national advisory body on equal treatment consiting of high level representatives of all Ministries has been established, as foreseen in the National Programme for Equal Treatment 2013–2016.

Some countries have created legal or policy provisions for defining the role of gender focal points and/or the inter-ministerial groups, namely Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Germany, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Portugal and Sweden.

Read more about these countries

Other structures

Addressing discrimination based on sex and promoting equal treatment between women and men in accordance with EU directives are tasks that have been assigned to specific bodies in all 28 EU Member States. The independent anti‑discrimination bodies complement the work of the governmental gender equality bodies by virtue of their mandate to prevent the violation of rights and to give legal protection.

Equality bodies

Following the requirement of EU Directives, countries have established equality structures for the promotion, analysis, monitoring and support of equal treatment of all persons without discrimination. Some of these bodies focus solely on discrimination on grounds of sex; others handle equal treatment of women and men in the same independent body that focuses on discrimination on other grounds as well. Recently, a tendency has been noted in Member States to merge all grounds of discrimination, including discrimination based on sex, into the tasks of one independent body for promotion of equal treatment. It was already noted in the Swedish Pres­idency report that ‘[re]placing the independent bodies for protection against discrimination on the ground of sex with bodies for protection against multiple discrimination seems to be a trend among the MS’.

Recent developments show that equal treatment of women and men or discrimination based on the ground of sex has been merged into the broad spectrum of different forms of discrimination. This trend can have both positive and negative consequences that need to be further investigated and monitored. Learn more here

Equality bodies
Country Structure Ground of Discrimination
Sex Several
AT Equal Treat­ment Com­mission (pri­vate sector)
Federal Equal Treatment Commission (public sector)
  X
BE Institute for the Equality of Women and Men X  
BG Commission for Protection against Discrimination   X
CZ Public Defender of Rights (Om­budsperson)   X
DK The Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR)   X
DE Federal Anti‑Discrimination Agency   X
EE Gender Equal­ity and Equal Treatment Commissioner   X
IE The Equality Authority   X
EL The Greek Ombudsman   X
ES Institute for Women X  
FR Defender of Rights   X
HR Ombudsper­son for Gen­der Equality X  
IT Italy has not designated an independent body for equal treatment in accordance with Directive 2002/73/EC. All tasks such as the promotion, analysis, monitoring and support of equal treatment of all persons without discrimination on grounds of sex are performed by the Department for Equal Opportunities.    
CY Equality Authority under the office of the Commissioner for Admin­istration (Ombudsman)   X
LV Office of Ombudsman   X
LT Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsper­son   X
LU Centre for Equal Treatment   X
HU Equal Treatment Authority   X
MT National Commission for the Promotion of Equality   X
NL The Nether­lands Institute for Human Rights   X
PL Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman)
Government Plenipotentiary for Equal Treatment
*The Human Rights Defender and the Government Plenipotentiary for Equal Treatment are both equality bodies within the definition set up by the EU directives
  X
PT Commission for Equality in Labour and Employment   X
RO National Council for Combating Discrimination   X
SI Advocate of the Principle of Equality   X
SK Slovak Na­tional Centre for Human Rights   X
FI The Om­budsman for Equality X X
SE Equality Ombudsman   X
UK Equality and Human Rights Commission   X

source: European network of equality bodies (Equinet)

[*] The information provided in this page was last updated in 2015

All Member States have institutional mechanisms for gender equality, but to ensure their effective functioning and performance, it is important to involve in the consultation process relevant branches of civil society, such as centres for women’s studies and research, academic and educational institutions, non‑governmental organisations (especially women’s organisations) and other actors.

Advisory and consultative structures

According to the BPfA, alongside governmental gender equality bodies and independent bodies for the promotion of equal treatment of women and men, the institutional structure for gender equality should provide possibilities to involve civil society.

Six countries have created structures to advise and support the design, implementation and assessment of gender equality policies: Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Portugal and Slovakia. Their members are generally NGOs and ministerial representatives; other members may include gender experts, trade unions, representatives of employers, academia and public/state organisations.

Whereas stakeholder participation in gender equality/gender mainstreaming policies has been integrated or institutionalised in a majority of Member States, it still fails to be fully embedded at every stage of the policy process, where it rarely or only occasionally informs policymaking. Learn more here

Advisory and consultative structures for gender equality policies
Country Advisory and consultative structures NGOs Ministerial representatives Gender experts Others
BE Council for Equal Opportunities between Men and Women X X   X
BG National Council for Equal Opportunities of Women and Men X X   X
CZ Council of the Government for Equal Opportunities for Women and Men X X X X
FR High Gender Equality Council X X X X
PT Consultative Council of the Commission for Citizenship and Gender Equality X X X  
SK Governmental Council for Human Rights, Minorities and Gender Equality (Committee for Gender Equality) X X   X

Some countries have established structures to deal with equality in labour and employment, generally overseen by the relevant ministry and involve other social partners in their organisational composition; they are responsible for promoting equality between women and men in labour, employment and vocational training. Italy has set up a National Committee of Equality and Equal Opportunities in Employment. Portugal has established a Commission for Equality in Labour and Employment. In Luxemburg, the Female Labour Committee serves as advisory body to the government on labour-related topics, comprising representatives of ministries, women’s NGOs, trade unions and employers. Cyprus has a Gender Equality Committee in Employment and Vocational Training, responsible for monitoring the implementation of the relevant equal-treatment law. It can accept complaints of discrimination within the sphere of employment and vocational training. In France, the implementation of gender equality policy in the realm of labour and employment is covered by the Superior Council for Gender Equality in the Workplace.

Advisory structures for gender equality in labour and employment
Country Advisory structure
CY Gender Equality Committee in Employment and Vocational Training
FR Superior Council for Gender Equality in the Workplace
IT National Committee of Equality and Equal Opportunities in Employment
LU Female Labour Committee

Read more about these countries

[*] The information provided in this page was last updated in 2015

Observatories and research centres

Observatories and research centres that are specifically dedicated to investigating and monitoring gender equality topics can be found in Cyprus, Greece, Poland and Spain.

The Cyprus Gender Equality Observatory (CGEO) is an NGO with social, scientific and research activities combating all forms of discrimination.

The Greek Research Centre for Gender Equality (KETHI) is a private legal entity under the supervision of the governmental gender-equality body. It has a double focus: to conduct social research on gender-equality issues and to improve women’s status in all areas of political, economic and social life.

The Polish Gender Equality Observatory is a non-governmental initiative that analyses, monitors and promotes gender equality in Poland since 2009. Based in Warsaw, the Observatory is a program in the renowned Institute of Public Affairs, a leading Polish think-tank, established in 1995. The Observatory’s research projects are supported by expert knowledge of researchers from top Polish universities. The Observatory monitors national legislation influencing the issues of gender equality, especially connected to issues of reproductive rights, violence, family policy (parental leaves etc.), electoral system. Furthermore, an Observatory of gender (in)equality in media was established in Poland within the framework of the Congress of women. The Observatory monitors media in terms of discrimination against women as well as observing the role of media in promoting gender equality slogans especially in the context of election campaigns; another task of the Observatory is to response to the inequalities / discrimination in media.

The Spanish Equal Opportunities for Women and Men Observatory, overseen by the central Women’s Institute, seeks on one hand to gather, analyse and disseminate information on a regular and systematic basis regarding the situation facing women and men in social and employment-related issues. On the other hand, it proposes policies that seek to improve the situation of women in various fields. The Women’s Institute also includes an Observatory of Women’s Image, which promotes a sound, non‑stereotyped image of women.

Read more about these countries

[*] The information provided in this page was last updated in 2015

The regional structures

To some extent, the gender mainstreaming framework at the regional level tends to be organised similarly to the national level: existence of legal and political arrangements; existence of a governmental gender equality body; existence of units with a gender mainstreaming mandate in the regional ministries; and a regional coordination structure for the implementation of gender equality policies.

Regional Structures in six Member States

The regional gender equality structures in six countries are taken into consideration here, namely Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Spain and the UK. To some extent, the gender mainstreaming framework tends to be organised similarly to the national level: legal and political arrangements; existence of a governmental gender equality body; existence of units with a gender mainstreaming mandate in the regional ministries; and a regional coordination structure for the implementation of gender equality policies.

Either national/federal gender equality laws or gender equality laws issued by the regional authorities are in place in each of the six Member States. In Austria, all nine states – which have some legislative authority distinct from the federal government – have passed resolutions for implementing gender mainstreaming. In Belgium, anti-discrimination/equal opportunities legislation is in place in the three regions (i.e. Brussels, Flanders and Wallonia), and the regions of Flanders, Brussels and Wallonia have a legal framework for gender mainstreaming. In France, gender equality policy arrangements vary strongly across regions: in 2011, a governmental notice provided a comprehensive framework for the adoption of Regional Strategic Gender Equality Plans, as part of an initiative co-funded by the EU through PROGRESS. This institutional framing of regional plans also specifies the monitoring structure for their implementation, making regional prefects accountable and involving delegates at the departmental level. Additionally, evaluation procedures are also addressed, emphasising gender mainstreaming as a goal. In Germany, while all Länder have gender-equality laws in place, only some feature gender-equality strategies and have developed specific gender-mainstreaming plans. In Spain, gender mainstreaming has been extensively included in regional equality plans and laws. In the UK, Wales and Scotland are covered by the national Equality Act, while Northern Ireland has its own Gender Equality Act and Strategy.

Every region has a structure dealing specifically with women’s rights and/or gender equality (e.g. departments or units within regional ministries, bodies or services); only in two regions in the UK gender equality is associated with other policy areas.

In Austria, for each of the nine states, a department for women’s affairs and/or gender equality has been created. In Belgium, the Regions/Communities have an Equal Opportunity Unit within a ministry in their governments. In France, delegates to women’s rights and gender equality (Délégations Régionales aux Droits des Femmes et à l’Égalité) were established in each of the 26 regions to implement national gender-equality policies. In Germany, a department or a unit for gender equality has been created within a ministry in almost all Länder, typically under the oversight of ministries that cover social affairs, labour and/or health policies, with the exception of two regions that have integrated these departments under the responsibility of ministries of justice. Almost all ministries include the terms ‘gender equality’, ‘women’ or ‘emancipation’ in their designation. In Spain, all 17 autonomous communities have established at least one central structure responsible for gender policies. Two types of structures have been set up at regional level: autonomous agencies and departments. Ten regions have autonomous agencies analogous to the Women’s Institute at the national level. These are institutionalised by law, with their own budget and staff, and with similar goals and tasks. Seven regions have established specific departments in charge of gender-equality policies. In the UK, the gender equality structures at the regional level form part of the government departments of the devolved governments in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Wales and Scotland are covered by the Equality Act, whereas Northern Ireland has its own structures and arrangements.

Germany and Spain have created specific structures for gender mainstreaming. In Spain, gender units covering the whole regional administration have been created for some regions, while seven regions have opted to create a gender unit for each of the regional ministries. In Germany, two regions have created specific units for gender mainstreaming within the ministerial departments, namely Brandenburg and Saxony-Anhalt.

Inter-ministerial groups, commissions or committees for each region have been set up in Belgium, Germany and Spain, where representatives from regional ministries participate in meetings in order to coordinate regional gender-equality policies.

The interface between both the national and the regional level has been ensured through steering meetings (Austria) and conferences (Germany and Spain). These structures put together representatives from the national gender-equality central structure and representatives from the regional structures. The coordination capacity of the national level towards the regional level does not seem to be robust in the six examined countries. Whereas Austria appears to have a ‘top-down approach’ in which the national inter-ministerial working group provides direction and support to the regions, in Germany and Spain there is a ‘horizontal approach’ in which policies are jointly discussed and there is space for exchange of information and practices. The latter do not have any capacity to impose or monitor any directives. On the other hand, in Belgium and the UK there is a disconnect between both levels because policies are developed independently (in Belgian’s regions and Communities, and in Northern Ireland).

Read more about these countries

Disclaimer:

The present overview of the framework for the implementation of gender mainstreaming in the 28 EU Member States is assessed on the basis of selected aspects of Indicators 1 and 3 of the Council of the European Union. These indicators measure the attainment of some of the key objectives of Beijing Platform for Action's critical area 'H - Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women'. Learn more about the EU indicators for the Beijing Platform for Action area H

  • Governmental gender equality bodies
  • Legal and policy framework for gender mainstreaming at the national level
  • Structures for gender mainstreaming at the ministerial level
  • Other structures
  • The regional structures

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lietuva
  • El. paštas: eige.sec@eige.europa.eu
  • Telefonas: +370 5 215 7444
  • Administracija: +370 5 215 7400
  • Užpildykite šią formą, jei norite susisiekti su mumis / mūsų vieta žemėlapyje

    Find us

    image of map

    Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Media enquiries

    • Georgie Bradley
    •  +370 6 982 7826
    • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

    EIGE in social media

    • Follow us on Twitter
    • Follow us on Facebook
    • Follow us on Youtube
    • Follow us on Linkedin
    EIGE logo
    Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
     

    © 2023 Europos lyčių lygybės institutas

    Help us improve

    Take me to top

    • Web Accessibility
    • Legal notices
    • Personal Data Protection
    • Cookies Policy
    • The UK on EIGE's website
    • Contact us
    • Login