• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to current category navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Pereiti į pagrindinį turinį
  • Skip to footer

Gender mainstreaming

  • What is Gender mainstreaming
    • Policy cycle
  • Institutions and structures
    • European Union
    • EU Member States
    • Stakeholders
    • International organizations
  • Policy areas
    • Agriculture and rural development
      • Policy cycle
    • Culture
      • Policy cycle
    • Digital agenda
      • Policy cycle
    • Economic and financial affairs
      • #3 Steps Forward
        • How can you make a difference?
      • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
      • Policy cycle
    • Education
      • Policy cycle
    • Employment
      • Policy cycle
      • Structures
    • Energy
      • Policy cycle
    • Entrepreneurship
      • Policy cycle
    • Environment and climate change
      • Policy cycle
    • Health
      • Policy cycle
    • Justice
      • Policy cycle
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
      • Policy cycle
    • Migration
      • Policy cycle
    • Poverty
      • Policy cycle
    • Regional policy
      • Policy cycle
    • Research
      • Policy cycle
    • Security
      • Policy cycle
    • Sport
      • Policy cycle
    • Tourism
      • Policy cycle
    • Transport
      • Policy cycle
    • Youth
      • Policy cycle
  • Toolkits
    • Gender Equality Training
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Gender Equality Training
      • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
      • Who should use Gender Equality Training
      • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Assess the needs
          • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
          • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
          • 4. Write good terms of reference
          • 5. Select a trainer
        • Implementation phase
          • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
          • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
          • 8. Invite others to join in
          • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
          • 11. Assess long-term impacts
          • 12. Give space and support others
      • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Equality Training in the EU
      • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
      • More resources on Gender Equality Training
      • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
    • Gender Impact Assessment
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Gender Impact Assessment
      • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
      • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
      • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
      • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
        • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
        • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
        • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
        • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
        • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
      • Following up on gender impact assessment
      • General considerations
      • Examples from the EU
        • European Union
          • European Commission
        • National level
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Denmark
          • Finland
          • Sweden
        • Regional level
          • Basque country
          • Catalonia
        • Local level
          • Lower Saxony
          • Swedish municipalities
    • Institutional Transformation
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Institutional Transformation
        • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
        • Gender organisations
        • Types of institutions
        • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
        • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
      • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
        • Motivation model
      • Who the guide is for
      • Guide to Institutional Transformation
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
          • 2. Allocating resources
          • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
          • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
        • Implementation phase
          • 5. Establishing a support structure
          • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
          • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
          • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
          • 9. Developing gender equality competence
          • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
          • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
          • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
      • Dealing with resistance
        • Discourse level
        • Individual level
        • Organisational level
        • Statements and reactions
      • Checklist: Key questions for change
      • Examples from the EU
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Strengthening accountability
          • 2. Allocating resources
          • 3. Organisational analysis
          • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
        • Implementation phase
          • 5. Establishing a support structure
          • 6. Setting objectives
          • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
          • 8. Introducing methods and tools
          • 9. Developing Competence
          • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
          • 11. Launching action plans
          • 12. Promoting within an organisation
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
    • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
      • Back to toolkit page
      • WHAT
        • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
        • Terms and definitions
        • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
        • About the Gear Tool
      • WHY
        • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
        • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
        • Why change must be structural
        • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
      • HOW
        • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
          • Step 1: Getting started
          • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
          • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
        • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
          • Step 1: Getting started
          • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
          • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
        • GEAR action toolbox
          • Work-life balance and organisational culture
          • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
          • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
          • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
          • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
          • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
          • Data collection and monitoring
          • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
          • GEP development and implementation
          • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
        • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
        • Challenges & resistance
      • WHERE
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czechia
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Netherlands
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • United Kingdom
    • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is the tool for?
      • Who is the tool for?
      • How to use the tool
      • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
        • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
          • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
          • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
        • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
          • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
          • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
        • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
          • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
          • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
        • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
          • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
          • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
        • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
          • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
          • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
      • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
      • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
        • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
        • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
        • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
        • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
        • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
      • Glossary of terms
      • References and resources
    • Gender Budgeting
      • Back to toolkit page
      • ¿A quién está destinada esta guía?
      • ¿Por qué la presupuestación con perspectiva de género es importante en los Fondos Europeos objeto de gestión compartida?
        • Tres motivos por los que la presupuestación con perspectiva de género es fundamental en los Fondos de la UE
      • ¿Qué es la presupuestación con perspectiva de género?
        • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género: una introducción
        • ¿Qué tiene que ver la presupuestación con perspectiva de género con la vida de las mujeres y de los hombres?
        • ¿Qué implica la presupuestación con perspectiva de género en la práctica?
        • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género en los Fondos de la UE
          • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de cumplir los requisitos legales de la UE
          • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de promover la rendición de cuentas y la transparencia en la planificación y gestión de las finanzas públicas
          • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de aumentar la participación de las mujeres y los hombres en los procesos presupuestarios
          • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de impulsar la igualdad entre mujeres y hombres en toda su diversidad
      • ¿De qué modo podemos aplicar la presupuestación con perspectiva de género a los Fondos de la UE? Herramientas prácticas y ejemplos de Estados miembros
        • Herramienta 1: Adaptación de los Fondos de la UE al marco normativo de la UE en materia de igualdad de género
          • Base normativa y legislativa para las políticas de la UE en materia de igualdad de género
          • Requisitos concretos para la consideración de la igualdad de género en el marco de los Fondos de la UE
          • Condiciones favorables para los Fondos de la UE
          • Otros recursos
        • Herramienta 2: Análisis de las desigualdades y las necesidades en materia de género a escala nacional y subnacional
          • Pasos para evaluar y analizar las desigualdades y las necesidades en materia de género
          • Fase 1. Recopilar información y datos desagregados sobre el grupo destinatario
          • Fase 2. Identificar las desigualdades de género existentes y sus causas subyacentes
          • Fase 3. Consultar directamente a los grupos destinatarios
          • Fase 4. Extraer conclusiones
          • Otros recursos
        • Herramienta 3: La puesta en práctica de la igualdad de género en objetivos políticos (en acuerdos de asociación) y en objetivos/medidas específicos (en programas operativos)
          • Pasos para hacer efectiva la igualdad de género en acuerdos de asociación y programas operativos
          • Orientaciones generales sobre la integración efectiva de la igualdad de género en la formulación de objetivos políticos, medidas y objetivos específicos
          • Lista de control para poner en práctica el principio horizontal de la igualdad de género en los acuerdos de asociación
          • Lista de comprobación para poner en práctica el principio horizontal de la igualdad de género en los programas operativos
          • Ejemplos de la integración de la igualdad de género como principio horizontal en objetivos estratégicos y específicos
        • Herramienta 4: Coordinación y aspectos complementarios entre los Fondos de la UE para promover la conciliación de la vida familiar y la vida profesional
          • Medidas para mejorar la coordinación y los aspectos complementarios entre los Fondos
          • Paso 1. Adaptación a los objetivos estratégicos de la UE para la igualdad de género y los objetivos nacionales de igualdad de género
          • Pasos 2 y 3: Identificación y desarrollo de posibles intervenciones dirigidas a impulsar la conciliación entre la vida profesional y la vida familiar
          • Paso 4: Supervisión mediante el uso de indicadores dentro de los sistemas de seguimiento y evaluación
          • Estudio de caso ficticio 1: Conciliar el trabajo remunerado y la atención a la infancia
          • Estudio de caso ficticio 2: Conciliar el trabajo por turnos y la atención a la infancia
          • Estudio de caso ficticio 3: Conciliar el cuidado personal con el cuidado a los otros
          • Estudio de caso ficticio 4: Conciliar el cuidado de los hijos y las hijas y de personas de edad avanzada con el trabajo a turnos
          • Otros recursos
        • Herramienta 5: Definir asociaciones y la gobernanza multinivel: designar a los socios pertinentes, establecer la función de las personas expertas en cuestiones de género y determinar la composición de los comités de seguimiento
          • Pasos para definir las asociaciones y la gobernanza multinivel
          • Otros recursos
        • Herramienta 6: Desarrollar indicadores cuantitativos y cualitativos para promover la igualdad de género
          • Pasos para desarrollar indicadores cuantitativos y cualitativos
          • El FEDER y el Fondo de Cohesión (los mismos indicadores comunes)
          • FSE+
          • FEMP
          • Otros recursos
        • Herramienta 7: Definir los criterios de selección de los proyectos con enfoque de género
          • Pasos para apoyar la selección y el desarrollo de proyectos sensibles al género
          • Lista de control para la preparación de las propuestas de convocatorias de proyectos
          • Lista de control para los criterios de selección de proyectos
          • Herramienta complementaria: Acuerdos sensibles al género con las personas encargadas de la ejecución del proyecto
        • Herramienta 8: Seguimiento de las asignaciones de recursos para la igualdad de género en los fondos de la UE
          • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
          • The tracking system
          • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
          • Step 1: Ex ante approach
          • Step 2: Ex post approach
          • Examples of Step 2a
          • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
          • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
        • Herramienta 9: Transversalidad de género en el diseño de los proyectos
          • Pasos para integrar la perspectiva de igualdad de género en el diseño de los proyectos
          • Fase 1. Adecuación a los indicadores y objetivos en materia de género de los acuerdos de asociación y los programas operativos
          • Fase 2. Desarrollo y diseño del proyecto
          • Face 3. Ejecución del proyecto
          • Fase 4. Evaluación del proyecto
        • Herramienta 10: Integración de la perspectiva de género en los procesos de seguimiento y evaluación
          • Pasos para integrar la perspectiva de género en los procesos de seguimiento y evaluación
          • Otros recursos
        • Herramienta 11: Presentación de informes sobre el gasto en recursos en favor de la igualdad de género en los Fondos de la UE
          • Seguimiento de los gastos destinados a promover la igualdad de género
          • Otros recursos
      • Recursos
        • Referencias
        • Siglas y acrónimos
        • Agradecimientos
    • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Who is this toolkit for?
        • Guiding you through the toolkit
      • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
        • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
        • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
      • Why is gender-responsive public procurement important?
        • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
        • Why was this toolkit produced
      • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
        • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
        • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
        • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
        • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
        • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
        • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
        • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
        • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
      • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
        • Pre-procurement stage
          • Needs assessment
          • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
          • Preliminary market consultation
          • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
          • Defining the subject matter of the contract
          • Choosing the procedure
          • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
          • Dividing the contract into lots
          • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
          • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
          • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
          • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
          • Reserved contracts
          • Preparing tender documents
        • Procurement stage
          • Exclusion grounds
          • Selection criteria
          • Technical specifications
          • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
          • Award criteria
          • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
          • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
          • Use of labels/certifications
        • Post-procurement stage
          • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
          • Subcontracting
          • Monitoring
          • Reporting
          • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
      • References
      • Additional resources
  • Methods and tools
    • Browse
    • About EIGE's methods and tools
    • Gender analysis
    • Gender audit
    • Gender awareness-raising
    • Gender budgeting
    • Gender impact assessment
    • Gender equality training
    • Gender-responsive evaluation
    • Gender statistics and indicators
    • Gender monitoring
    • Gender planning
    • Gender-responsive public procurement
    • Gender stakeholder consultation
    • Sex-disaggregated data
    • Institutional transformation
    • Examples of methods and tools
    • Resources
  • Good practices
    • Browse
    • About good practices
    • EIGE’s approach to good practices
  • Country specific information
    • Belgium
      • Overview
    • Bulgaria
      • Overview
    • Czechia
      • Overview
    • Denmark
      • Overview
    • Germany
      • Overview
    • Estonia
      • Overview
    • Ireland
      • Overview
    • Greece
      • Overview
    • Spain
      • Overview
    • France
      • Overview
    • Croatia
      • Overview
    • Italy
      • Overview
    • Cyprus
      • Overview
    • Latvia
      • Overview
    • Lithuania
      • Overview
    • Luxembourg
      • Overview
    • Hungary
      • Overview
    • Malta
      • Overview
    • Netherlands
      • Overview
    • Austria
      • Overview
    • Poland
      • Overview
    • Portugal
      • Overview
    • Romania
      • Overview
    • Slovenia
      • Overview
    • Slovakia
      • Overview
    • Finland
      • Overview
    • Sweden
      • Overview
  • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
  • Concepts and definitions
  • Power Up conference 2019
Europos lyčių lygybės institutas logoEuropos lyčių lygybės institutas
Paieška

Paieškos forma

Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • ¿A quién está destinada esta guía?
        • ¿Por qué la presupuestación con perspectiva de género es importante en los Fondos Europeos objeto de gestión compartida?
          • Tres motivos por los que la presupuestación con perspectiva de género es fundamental en los Fondos de la UE
        • ¿Qué es la presupuestación con perspectiva de género?
          • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género: una introducción
          • ¿Qué tiene que ver la presupuestación con perspectiva de género con la vida de las mujeres y de los hombres?
          • ¿Qué implica la presupuestación con perspectiva de género en la práctica?
          • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género en los Fondos de la UE
            • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de cumplir los requisitos legales de la UE
            • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de promover la rendición de cuentas y la transparencia en la planificación y gestión de las finanzas públicas
            • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de aumentar la participación de las mujeres y los hombres en los procesos presupuestarios
            • La presupuestación con perspectiva de género como forma de impulsar la igualdad entre mujeres y hombres en toda su diversidad
        • ¿De qué modo podemos aplicar la presupuestación con perspectiva de género a los Fondos de la UE? Herramientas prácticas y ejemplos de Estados miembros
          • Herramienta 1: Adaptación de los Fondos de la UE al marco normativo de la UE en materia de igualdad de género
            • Base normativa y legislativa para las políticas de la UE en materia de igualdad de género
            • Requisitos concretos para la consideración de la igualdad de género en el marco de los Fondos de la UE
            • Condiciones favorables para los Fondos de la UE
            • Otros recursos
          • Herramienta 2: Análisis de las desigualdades y las necesidades en materia de género a escala nacional y subnacional
            • Pasos para evaluar y analizar las desigualdades y las necesidades en materia de género
            • Fase 1. Recopilar información y datos desagregados sobre el grupo destinatario
            • Fase 2. Identificar las desigualdades de género existentes y sus causas subyacentes
            • Fase 3. Consultar directamente a los grupos destinatarios
            • Fase 4. Extraer conclusiones
            • Otros recursos
          • Herramienta 3: La puesta en práctica de la igualdad de género en objetivos políticos (en acuerdos de asociación) y en objetivos/medidas específicos (en programas operativos)
            • Pasos para hacer efectiva la igualdad de género en acuerdos de asociación y programas operativos
            • Orientaciones generales sobre la integración efectiva de la igualdad de género en la formulación de objetivos políticos, medidas y objetivos específicos
            • Lista de control para poner en práctica el principio horizontal de la igualdad de género en los acuerdos de asociación
            • Lista de comprobación para poner en práctica el principio horizontal de la igualdad de género en los programas operativos
            • Ejemplos de la integración de la igualdad de género como principio horizontal en objetivos estratégicos y específicos
          • Herramienta 4: Coordinación y aspectos complementarios entre los Fondos de la UE para promover la conciliación de la vida familiar y la vida profesional
            • Medidas para mejorar la coordinación y los aspectos complementarios entre los Fondos
            • Paso 1. Adaptación a los objetivos estratégicos de la UE para la igualdad de género y los objetivos nacionales de igualdad de género
            • Pasos 2 y 3: Identificación y desarrollo de posibles intervenciones dirigidas a impulsar la conciliación entre la vida profesional y la vida familiar
            • Paso 4: Supervisión mediante el uso de indicadores dentro de los sistemas de seguimiento y evaluación
            • Estudio de caso ficticio 1: Conciliar el trabajo remunerado y la atención a la infancia
            • Estudio de caso ficticio 2: Conciliar el trabajo por turnos y la atención a la infancia
            • Estudio de caso ficticio 3: Conciliar el cuidado personal con el cuidado a los otros
            • Estudio de caso ficticio 4: Conciliar el cuidado de los hijos y las hijas y de personas de edad avanzada con el trabajo a turnos
            • Otros recursos
          • Herramienta 5: Definir asociaciones y la gobernanza multinivel: designar a los socios pertinentes, establecer la función de las personas expertas en cuestiones de género y determinar la composición de los comités de seguimiento
            • Pasos para definir las asociaciones y la gobernanza multinivel
            • Otros recursos
          • Herramienta 6: Desarrollar indicadores cuantitativos y cualitativos para promover la igualdad de género
            • Pasos para desarrollar indicadores cuantitativos y cualitativos
            • El FEDER y el Fondo de Cohesión (los mismos indicadores comunes)
            • FSE+
            • FEMP
            • Otros recursos
          • Herramienta 7: Definir los criterios de selección de los proyectos con enfoque de género
            • Pasos para apoyar la selección y el desarrollo de proyectos sensibles al género
            • Lista de control para la preparación de las propuestas de convocatorias de proyectos
            • Lista de control para los criterios de selección de proyectos
            • Herramienta complementaria: Acuerdos sensibles al género con las personas encargadas de la ejecución del proyecto
          • Herramienta 8: Seguimiento de las asignaciones de recursos para la igualdad de género en los fondos de la UE
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Herramienta 9: Transversalidad de género en el diseño de los proyectos
            • Pasos para integrar la perspectiva de igualdad de género en el diseño de los proyectos
            • Fase 1. Adecuación a los indicadores y objetivos en materia de género de los acuerdos de asociación y los programas operativos
            • Fase 2. Desarrollo y diseño del proyecto
            • Face 3. Ejecución del proyecto
            • Fase 4. Evaluación del proyecto
          • Herramienta 10: Integración de la perspectiva de género en los procesos de seguimiento y evaluación
            • Pasos para integrar la perspectiva de género en los procesos de seguimiento y evaluación
            • Otros recursos
          • Herramienta 11: Presentación de informes sobre el gasto en recursos en favor de la igualdad de género en los Fondos de la UE
            • Seguimiento de los gastos destinados a promover la igualdad de género
            • Otros recursos
          • Referencias
          • Siglas y acrónimos
          • Agradecimientos
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
Toggle sidebar menu
  • Pirmas
  • Gender mainstreaming
  • Country specific information
  • Estonia

Contest for family-friendly firms

PrintDownload as PDF
Good practice
Šalis: Estonia
Section:
Reconciliation
Temos:
Employment
Period:
2001 - 2014
Publication date:
09 Kovas 2015
The most family and employee friendly company competition (Pere- ja Töötajasõbralike firmade konkurss)

In brief

Since 2001, two Estonian publications have organised a competition to find the family-friendliest firm in the country, and since 2009 the government has given financial support under its action plan to improve the reconciliation of work and family life (2011-2015).

The competition raises awareness of family-friendly corporate culture, and gives welcome publicity to the winners. Companies are evaluated both by their management and their employees through a company employee survey and a report from the company. Three awards are made each year, to the overall winner, the family-friendliest company and the employee-friendliest company. The initiative has had an impact by promoting good practices in companies and in public places like museums, events and cafés. With 90 companies competing in 2013, the initiative has grown in popularity and the government is planning to take a further step by introducing a family-friendly company certificate in 2014. The competition appears to be more attractive to large companies which have resources and human resources policies in this area.

The measure is transferable to any country – competitions can help to raise the profile and visibility of corporate culture. It is innovative in that it was initiated and funded by two media outlets and later funded by the ministry. The development of a new certificate could become one of the ways of extending the initiative to smaller companies.

A private initiative changes national policy

Since 2001 the Bonnier Group daily business newspaper Äripäev (Business Daily) and the magazine Pere ja Kodu (Family and Home) have organised the Pere- ja Töötajasõbralike firmade konkurss, a contest to select the most family- and employee-friendly companies in Estonia. Until 2008, the two publications financed the competition, but since 2009, the Estonian Ministry of Social Affairs has taken this over, with a budget of approximately €4,000 per year. The aim of the contest has been to raise the profile of companies that value a family-friendly corporate culture. The companies are evaluated both by their management and by their employees. The winner of the competition is the company that achieves the highest score in three broad areas: family-friendliness, working environment and support for employee development. The winners of the competition gain media attention in Pere ja Kodu and Äripäev, but also via other channels. The media attention promotes the company’s public image, and the winners are honoured at a public ceremony. “I can’t say that Estonian society was child- or family-friendly in 2000. Ten years ago the issue of family-friendly companies was very rarely, if ever, raised in Estonia,” says Tiia Kõnnussaar, Pere ja Kodu’s editor-in-chief.

The initiative was developed in a wider policy context for gender equality under the government’s Action Programme 2011-2015, which aims to improve the opportunities for reconciling family and working life as well as to promote family-friendliness in society, and the Strategy for Children and Families (2012-2020) which also has the objective of providing equal opportunities for men and women by reconciling working and family life.

Three annual awards

In order to assess the family-friendliness of companies taking part, two separate surveys are carried out among their management and employees. They cover family-friendliness, the working environment and support for employees’ development. The final result is compiled from the weighted assessments of the employees and managers, with employees’ opinions being given 60% of the weight. The employees assess their satisfaction in five domains: aspects of working life, working arrangements, wages, training options and family and work reconciliation options. They can also assess how well a company deals with conflict, if there is bullying and harassment, overtime, the option of part-time work, and support for people with caring responsibilities. The surveys include questions about promoting men’s involvement in reconciling work and family life: for example there is a question whether the company promotes fathers’ use of parental leave. The company also gets a chance to report on their policies, whether they provide time off, organise family events, pay benefits and bonuses in case of birth etc.

Each year three companies are presented with awards for the overall winner, the family-friendliest and the employee-friendliest company. Additionally in recent years awards have been made to a family-friendly museum, family-friendly events and a family-friendly cafeteria. The contest has gained popularity and more companies have been taking part: in 2013, 90 companies participated, about 1% of all companies in the country).

In 2001 when the contest was initiated the topic of family friendliness among companies was very new and the initiative was really innovative in the Estonian context. In recent years the winning companies have gained a lot of media attention, and are often welcomed at conferences and seminars on human resources development. The contest has increased the awareness of employers as to their responsibility and role in supporting family and work reconciliation. This has proved to be a good way to increase awareness of the role of employer in the family and work reconciliation process, especially in countries like Estonia where the social responsibility and awareness of the role of employers is low.

Certification to be introduced

One of the actions in the government action programme stipulates that family-friendly companies will be nationally recognised and in order to do this a certification scheme is to be introduced. The government is currently developing the methodology and certification will be introduced during 2014. Thus the contest may have led to the acknowledgement of the significance of this kind of award.

The contest motivates companies to provide and develop family-friendly measures. However, due to the fact that it follows the “beauty contest” model (i.e. only a few of the best contenders get the title), it may not motivate small companies with limited resources. These do not have the resources to develop official reconciliation policies or provide services to make the working environment family-friendly. This is illustrated by the fact that the winners are relatively large companies (in 2013 the winner was Microsoft Estonia). In Estonia, however, the majority of companies are very small (94% of companies have 10 employees or fewer). Therefore the forthcoming certification system is significant in that it will open up the possibility for all companies to qualify and will and promote a wider interest in the reconciliation of work and family life.

The Ministry of Social Affairs is currently developing the certificate for family-friendly companies, drawing on examples of the content and implementation of certification systems in France, Germany, Austria and Slovenia. The success of certification will, however, depend on the conditions companies will have to meet, and whether it will be open to small companies, which often have different needs and possibilities from large companies. In 2013, the certificate was piloted to assess the readiness and capacity of Estonian companies to analyse their family and employee-friendliness. Six companies took part in the pilot project, which discussed the criteria and methodology of the certificate with employers and employees.

The success of the contest demonstrates that a small-scale initiative of a private company (a newspaper in this case) can draw attention to the need to reward companies for their efforts to being family-friendly, and can lead to the development of nationwide policy. It clearly suggests that small and regular awareness raising activities can have a wider influence.

Contacts/Further Information

Contacts

Rivo Sarapik

Head of Editorial

Äripäev AS

Pärnu mnt 105

19094 Tallinn

Estonia 

+ 372 667 0181

rivo@aripaev.ee

Further information

Questionnaire for employers

Questionnaire for employees

Video

More good practices

EIGE's collection of good practices

EIGE's approach to good practices

Downloads

Contest for family-friendly firms - Estonia
EN (PDF, 316.06 KB)

Metadata

Tool:
Benchmarking
  • In brief
  • A private initiative changes national policy
  • Three annual awards
  • Certification to be introduced
  • Contacts/Further Information
  • More good practices
  • Downloads

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lietuva
  • El. paštas: eige.sec@eige.europa.eu
  • Telefonas: +370 5 215 7444
  • Administracija: +370 5 215 7400
  • Užpildykite šią formą, jei norite susisiekti su mumis / mūsų vieta žemėlapyje

    Find us

    image of map

    Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

    Media enquiries

    • Georgie Bradley
    •  +370 6 982 7826
    • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

    EIGE in social media

    • Follow us on Twitter
    • Follow us on Facebook
    • Follow us on Youtube
    • Follow us on Linkedin
    EIGE logo
    Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
     

    © 2023 Europos lyčių lygybės institutas

    Help us improve

    Take me to top

    • Web Accessibility
    • Legal notices
    • Personal Data Protection
    • Cookies Policy
    • The UK on EIGE's website
    • Contact us
    • Login