• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
European Institute for Gender Equality logoEuropean Institute for Gender Equality
Search

Search form

English
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
        • What is gender budgeting?
          • Introducing gender budgeting
          • Gender budgeting in women’s and men’s lived realities
          • What does gender budgeting involve in practice?
          • Gender budgeting in the EU Funds
            • Gender budgeting as a way of complying with EU legal requirements
            • Gender budgeting as a way of promoting accountability and transparency
            • Gender budgeting as a way of increasing participation in budget processes
            • Gender budgeting as a way of advancing gender equality
        • Why is gender budgeting important in the EU Funds?
          • Three reasons why gender budgeting is crucial in the EU Funds
        • How can we apply gender budgeting in the EU Funds? Practical tools and Member State examples
          • Tool 1: Connecting the EU Funds with the EU’s regulatory framework on gender equality
            • Legislative and regulatory basis for EU policies on gender equality
            • Concrete requirements for considering gender equality within the EU Funds
            • EU Funds’ enabling conditions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 2: Analysing gender inequalities and gender needs at the national and sub-national levels
            • Steps to assess and analyse gender inequalities and needs
            • Step 1. Collect information and disaggregated data on the target group
            • Step 2. Identify existing gender inequalities and their underlying causes
            • Step 3. Consult directly with the target groups
            • Step 4. Draw conclusions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 3: Operationalising gender equality in policy objectives and specific objectives/measures
            • Steps for operationalising gender equality in Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes
            • General guidance on operationalising gender equality when developing policy objectives, specific objectives and measures
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Partnership Agreements
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Operational Programmes
            • Examples of integrating gender equality as a horizontal principle in policy objectives and specific objectives
          • Tool 4: Coordination and complementarities between the EU Funds to advance work-life balance
            • Steps for enhancing coordination and complementarities between the funds
            • Step 1. Alignment with the EU’s strategic engagement goals for gender equality and national gender equality goals
            • Steps 2 and 3. Identifying and developing possible work-life balance interventions
            • Step 4. Following-up through the use of indicators within M&E systems
            • Fictional case study 1: reconciling paid work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 2: reconciling shift work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 3: balancing care for oneself and others
            • Fictional case study 4: reconciling care for children and older persons with shift work
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 5: Defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Steps for defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 6: Developing quantitative and qualitative indicators for advancing gender equality
            • Steps to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
            • ERDF and Cohesion Fund
            • ESF+
            • EMFF
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 7: Defining gender-sensitive project selection criteria
            • Steps to support gender-sensitive project development and selection
            • Checklist to guide the preparation of calls for project proposals
            • Checklist for project selection criteria
            • Supplementary tool 7.a: Gender-responsive agreements with project implementers
          • Tool 8: Tracking resource allocations for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Tool 9: Mainstreaming gender equality in project design
            • Steps to mainstream gender equality in project design
            • Step 1. Alignment with partnership agreements’ and Operational Programmes’ gender objectives and indicators
            • Step 2. Project development and application
            • Step 3. Project implementation
            • Step 4. Project assessment
          • Tool 10: Integrating a gender perspective in monitoring and evaluation processes
            • Steps to integrate a gender perspective in M&E processes
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 11: Reporting on resource spending for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Tracking expenditures for gender equality
            • Additional resources
          • References
          • Abbreviations
          • Acknowledgements
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
        • Browse all Belgium content
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
        • Browse all Bulgaria content
      • Czechia
        • Overview
        • Browse all Czechia content
      • Denmark
        • Overview
        • Browse all Denmark content
      • Germany
        • Overview
        • Browse all Germany content
      • Estonia
        • Overview
        • Browse all Estonia content
      • Ireland
        • Overview
        • Browse all Ireland content
      • Greece
        • Overview
        • Browse all Greece content
      • Spain
        • Overview
        • Browse all Spain content
      • France
        • Overview
        • Browse all France content
      • Croatia
        • Overview
        • Browse all Croatia content
      • Italy
        • Overview
        • Browse all Italy content
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
        • Browse all Cyprus content
      • Latvia
        • Overview
        • Browse all Latvia content
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
        • Browse all Lithuania content
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
        • Browse all Luxembourg content
      • Hungary
        • Overview
        • Browse all Hungary content
      • Malta
        • Overview
        • Browse all Malta content
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
        • Browse all Netherlands content
      • Austria
        • Overview
        • Browse all Austria content
      • Poland
        • Overview
        • Browse all Poland content
      • Portugal
        • Overview
        • Browse all Portugal content
      • Romania
        • Overview
        • Browse all Romania content
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
        • Browse all Slovenia content
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
        • Browse all Slovakia content
      • Finland
        • Overview
        • Browse all Finland content
      • Sweden
        • Overview
        • Browse all Sweden content
      • United Kingdom
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the Western Balkans and Turkey
        • Gender statistics in the Western Balkans and Turkey
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
  • Home
  • Gender stereotypes
  • Search for gender stories

My personal story

PrintDownload as PDF
Narrative
Country: Italy
Sex:
Female
Primary Topic:
PROFESSIONAL CAREER
Year:
2010

R: (The other experience) is about my job at present, as I was hired at a Research and Training Centre here (city’s name) in 2009 , with a one year fixed term contract, with the possibility of transforming it into an open ended one, as it happened to all colleagues who were hired before me, so when I was having my second interview the one that was aimed at confirming my position where all conditions were discussed I already tried to ask for a working hours’ reduction, to work 7 instead of 8 hours, considering that (son’s name) was one and a half year’s old; the secretary general, a woman, stressed that we are 13 employees with an open ended contract, of whom 12 are women, and she did not allow me to talk about it a lot, as she was afraid that this would have enhanced other requests by my colleagues which would have been even less legitimate as they are not even mothers but satisfying or at least trying to do it would have fostered other claims by other colleagues or would create a fertile round in that sense, as this Centre is like a small family.
We are all quite seasoned as we are all women, and it’s quite interesting to see how for this general secretary was difficult to allow me to do it even as a mother of a very young boy, and in general to concede anything, as we have also colleagues who commute every day from a different town and without being mothers themselves, they nurse a grudge against the 3 mothers at their workplace, as we were legitimate to ask for more flexibility, reduced working hours, a sort of adapting….without impacting on your productivity, you would like to explain to your bosses if they did not realize it yet that it is possible, that you are not less productive if you work 6 hours, but you can even be perform better.
(....)

I: When did this happen?

R: It happened in October 2010, my contract was expiring in december, and independently from how things were solved, not in a very correct way, there were other problems but when I said 'I'm not going to renovate my contract under these conditions and considering how much you are paying me and my responsibilities, I don't have any intentions to... I 'm rather going back to work as a teacher for 5/6 hours a day, I don't care at all, but if I want to do such a work where I'm building something, or if I have to take care of certain things I would like to have the tools to do it my own way, and for these reasons I was proposing part time, so my contract was transformed in an open ended one in such a hurry as there wasn't the time to do it etc. They told me 'yes, yes, please sign it and then we're going to talk about part time later on', then for strategic reasons some people were quitting their jobs, my boss was a bit uncertain etc, they decided at the end that it was more strategic for that moment to keep me at my own conditions instead of having to re-train someone else to do certain things and I have to say I was quite surprised they gave me quite a free hand about how to arrange things, as the secretary general went to the administrative legal consultant and asked me on the phone ' so what do you want?', and it was a pity to arrange things in such a hurry but I think there were many reasons to accept my request for a part time, I do not think the fact that I have a child was a crucial reason for my employer, the main reason was that: ' we want you to be quiet...'
(...)

R: I obtained a six hours a day part time ..

I: It is horizontal part time, then.

R: It would have probably been better to try and concentrate 30 hours per week, or even 35, in 4 days. It was a nice act that I appreciated and that changed my relation with time a lot and my relation with (her child's name) and my awareness that you need to optimize the work you're doing and the time you offer and you're paid for at work, so I am repeating it, I don't want to lose myself in less relevant issues, I think my request for a part time as the third mother at my workplace who was not allowed to work part time, to a certain extent it had to be accepted, as there was a track record about it and they would have needed to explain why...
(...)

R: As for the way things have been arranged the implicit request is you have to do in 6 hours what you were already doing in 10 hours, which is quite stressful but with the parallel experience of being mother the organization, the efficiency, shopping, having a partner who is quite away both for work reasons and as a person who is a bit lost in his thoughts, as for the way this part time has been connected to the relation with my partners, the outcome is not that I have more time for myself, not at all…

I: I can imagine.

R: The time that I gain, you go shopping or you go with (name of her child) to do something, so I still have to find the way to assign responsibilities to my partner, but it is taken for granted that as you are a woman you work, you have to spend more time with your child than his father, you have to take care of leisure activities then he is very happy that his child is attending it but it is you the one who have to collect information, to investigate, this is my feeling and it is really tiring and not fair, but at the same time it is a source of big strenght , it's not that you feel all-powerful, so I'm doing this and that, then I have a part time so I do it in 6 hours instead of 10, but I manage to... it gives you such a charge and you say 'do you want to give any more responsibilities at work?'. In some way I am going to manage it, and it is a very good training.
Nowadays I am really understanding why a woman like this colleague of mine, who has 2 small children and is a single mother, is extremely good at her work, in the sense that there is not any time to lose, she is seasoned and she hasn’t time to waste at work, clear goals, precise steps, all this exercise in organizing work, life, the child: being a woman helps in really being selective, changing methods, being much more focused in a way, I really feel we really take this with us and apply it, it’s a way of doing things, accepting challenger with a greater openness.
(...)

I: Ok, so the new conditions were reduced working hours for reduced salary and the same goals?

R: Ehh, well I still have to see, as it started from the 1st March and I still have to verify it, as I struggled a lot for it, I even went to a legal administrative assistant to complain about irregularities in my contract, actually all contracts at the Centre, a contract where it is not clearly stated which your position and tasks and related economic treatment and it seems that my request, a quite famous professional I consulted told me that there were all conditions to engage in a dispute as substantially my tasks are the ones of a Program Director and I had to fight and I got angry about it, to change my job's title, as I formally was an adminsitrative secretary assistant of the Programme Director, so I said "Look, we can put it as we want, but something like that with a 'slash' or administrative secretary and then my real functions added and specified as my tasks were those of an executive director, so you have to change my job title'.

I: Could you get it?

R: I did it, absolutely. not as an executive director as otherwise they would have made a fuss about it, I don't know how to translate it into italian, the title is ' executive officer'.

Italian

I : Procediamo con la seconda storia che volevi raccontare e che riguarda l'ambito lavorativo al presente se non sbaglio?

R : Riguarda l'ambito lavorativo al presente, la mia assunzione in un centro di ricerca di formazione di alto livello qua a (nome della città), sono stata assunta nel 2009 con un contratto a tempo determinato di un anno, con possibilità chiaramente di trasformazione di contratto a tempo indeterminato come è successo a più o meno tutti i miei predecessori, quindi una posizione a tempo full-time e in sede di secondo colloquio, quindi quello di conferma dove un po' si discutevano le varie condizioni avevo già provato a chiedere se potevo fare sette ore invece che otto, comunque considerando che (nome del figlio) aveva un anno e mezzo o due forse, il segretario generale, quindi donna, puntualizzo che siamo tredici dipendenti a tempo indeterminato di cui dodici donne, non mi ha concesso di parlarne più di tanto perché aveva paura che questo invece instaurasse delle richieste meno legittime forse in quanto le altre non erano madri ma che l'accontentare o comunque il venire in contro, cercare di dare dei segnali, di poter considerare questa come possibilità andasse in qualche modo a creare un terreno fertile per altre richieste, siccome insomma è un po' una piccola famiglia questo centro, è molto difficile da gestire anche perché sono tutte o siamo tutte abbastanza agguerrite per certi versi; in quanto ambiente tutto al femminile sostanzialmente è abbastanza interessante vedere come poi, e me ne sto rendendo conto adesso, questo segretario generale aveva anche delle difficoltà a concedere a me in quanto madre di un bambino piccolo, fare qualsiasi concessione perché poi abbiamo anche delle colleghe che vengono anche da (nome di una seconda città) ogni giorno, che non sono madri ma che guardavano quindi alle tre madri esistenti in questo posto con un po' di risentimento, perché mentre noi agli occhi delle altre donne eravamo sì legittimate nel fare queste richieste di tempo ridotto, di maggiore flessibilità, di un adattamento che, senza nulla togliere alla tua produttività, vorresti cercare di spiegare anche ai tuoi capi forse se non l'hanno ancora capito che è possibile e che non sei meno produttiva se lavori sei ore, anzi ne produci di più, però ti ripeto, riguardo la questione, non lo so se è il caso di scindere, o forse se questo potrebbe essere uno spunto di riflessione tra le donne che chiedono appunto un migliore equilibrio tra le ore di lavoro e gli impegni familiari, quanto invece questa possa essere una richiesta legittima anche per donne che figli non ne hanno ma che dicono: "io posso avere la palestra, posso avere degli interessi miei personali", non mi è mai stato detto da altre donne, colleghe, questo, però noto che a volte proprio tra donne, magari anche soprattutto per donne che hanno la mia stessa età che non possono avere figli si sentono ti ripeto meno autorizzate e meno legittimate nel magari avanzare un tipo di proposta che possa appunto non riguardare la maternità, ma riguardare una revisione delle modalità di lavoro a cui invece questo non viene proprio concesso.

I : Questa è la fonte di risentimento?

R : Ma penso un po' di sì, ti ripeto non è così esplicito, non è così brutale, non impedisce di lavorare bene però nelle conversazioni da bar con alcune delle mie colleghe, c'è quella che magari viene da (nome della seconda città) e avrebbe voglia di essere più flessibile, c'è la nostra bibliotecaria che invece ha tutt'altri interessi però anche a lei farebbe comodo lavorare sei ore, quindi forse sì il part-time potrebbe essere una questione, ma neanche tanto di genere quanto proprio di rivalutazione, però non allontaniamoci magari troppo dall'obbiettivo che era il secondo episodio, quindi in fase di conferma del rapporto di lavoro che si trasforma da determinato ad indeterminato e quando mi viene chiesto: "ma hai voglia di continuare?", io dico: "sì, ma non a queste condizioni".

I : Quanto tempo fa questo?

R : Questo a ottobre del 2010, quindi il contratto scadeva a dicembre, al di là delle peripezie di come poi le cose non sono state fatte bene e ci sono stati altri tipi di problematiche però quando io ho avanzato, cioè tipo: "non rinnovo, in queste condizioni, per quello che mi pagate, per le responsabilità, io non ho minimamente intenzione, torno a fare l'insegnante, cinque / sei ore al giorno, non me ne potrebbe fregare di meno, però se voglio fare un lavoro dove costruisco o comunque seguo un certo tipo di cose vorrei avere uno strumento per poterle fare, che mi consenta di farle a modo mio e quindi poi questa mia proposta del part-time, dunque il contratto mi è stato trasformato in tempo indeterminato in fretta e furia perché prima non c'è stato tempo eccetera ..: "sì, sì intanto firma questo poi parliamo del part time più in là", dopodiché per motivi strategici al lavoro certe persone andavano, il mio capo era un po' in bilico eccetera, si è ritenuto che invece fosse in quel momento più strategico avermi alle mie condizioni che non avermi del tutto e riformare una persona a fare determinate cose, devo dire che con molta mia sorpresa mi è stata data abbastanza carta bianca sul dove, come e quando, ma talmente a breve, nel senso che il segretario generale è andato dal consulente del lavoro e al telefono mi dice: "quindi cosa vuoi?", e anche lì è un po' un peccato che le cose vengano fatte velocemente, però in ogni caso che il part time mi sia stato concesso per vari motivi e non penso invece che il motivo dell'avere un bambino piccolo sia stato fondamentale per l'azienda nel concedermelo, il motivo era quello: basta che stai buona...

I : Che rimanga.

R : ..e che rimani. Per quello poi io penso che altre persone avrebbero potuto o potrebbero avanzare altre richieste di questo tipo.

I : E hai ottenuto un part-time orizzontale / verticale?

R : Ho ottenuto un part-time di sei ore al giorno...

I : Orizzontale.

R : Avrei potuto invece pensandoci bene magari cercare di concentrare trenta ore settimanali, magari anche trentacinque in quattro giorni, quindi levare modalità. E' stato un gesto importante, apprezzato, che ha cambiato molto il mio rapporto con il tempo, il mio rapporto con (nome del figlio) e la mia consapevolezza, sempre di più, che bisogna in tutti i modi ottimizzare sia il lavoro che fai, ma ottimizzare il tempo che tu dai e offri retribuita al lavoro, ribadisco quindi, ritornando al punto, non vorrei perdermi nei vari meandri che sono meno rilevanti, penso che la mia richiesta di part-time in quanto la terza mamma operativo che non ce l'aveva, doveva in qualche modo essere "accettata", proprio perché c'erano dei precedenti avrebbero dovuto forse motivare come...

I : Le altre due madri avevano il part-time?

R : C'erano altre due madri, una è external relations manager, quindi non è detto che una donna "manager" non possa fare il part-time, insomma poi c'è tutta questa grande diatriba, no assolutamente di potere ma di maggiore responsabilità, l'incompatibilità di questo con un lavoro flessibile; questo è totalmente smentito dalla nostra esperienza e ti ripeto per come poi le cose sono state impostate, cioè la richiesta implicita ma semplicemente il fatto che devi produrre in sei quello che prima producevi in dieci è estremamente stressante però forse in parallelo con l'esperienza di essere madre e quindi l'organizzazione, l'efficienza, il fare la spesa, il non avere forse un partner in questo, cioè che è abbastanza assente per motivi suoi, sia di lavoro, sia anche di persona un po' persa nelle sue cose però io sento che e qua magari possiamo inserire una piccola aggiunta rispetto anche a come questo poi si rapporta al rapporto di coppia, a questo part-time che mi è stato dato non vuol dire che in realtà io ho più tempo per me, anzi...

I : Immagino.

R : Quel tempo che ricavo, chiaramente vai o fare la spesa, vai con (nome del figlio) a fare due cose, eccetera quindi in realtà devo ancora trovare adesso la chiave invece per responsabilizzare di più l'altra persona, si dà comunque per scontato in alcuni casi che sei donna, lavori, vedi tuo figlio un po' di più rispetto all'uomo, tendi un po' a capire a cercare attività da fare rispetto a lui, poi ben felice che il figlio le faccia però sei tu che vai, che scavi, che indaghi, ma questo ho la percezione che ti ripeto, anche se lo trovo estremamente stancante, poco giusto, però è una fonte di grande forza e di grande, non senso di onnipotenza, cioè che io faccio questo questo e questo, poi ho un part-time lo faccio in sei, ore però dovrei farne dieci, però in realtà riesco, dà una sferzata, una carica dove ti ripeto...: "mi vuoi dare ancora una responsabilità al lavoro in più?", da qualche parte tiro da qualche molla ma ce la faccio ed è un'ottima palestra, ora capisco molto il perché invece una donna, come questa mia collega, con due bambini piccoli, single, quindi madre single, faccia estremamente bene il suo lavoro, sia estremamente agguerrita, al punto giusto, nel senso che non c'è tempo da perdere, non ci si perde in quisquiglie quando si è al lavoro, obbiettivi chiari, step molto chiari, tutto questo esercizio di organizzare il lavoro, la vita, il bambino, l'essere donna ti aiuta un po' a sfrondare poi le cose, a cambiare metodo, a farle veramente essendo molto più focused in un certo senso, sento che c'è proprio questa capacità di (...) che poi ce lo portiamo a casa, lo applichiamo, che ormai è un po' uno stampino dove le sfide le accogli con molta più predisposizione, le accoglie e anche a sostenerle poi e penso che questo sia in parte un esercizio che l'essere donna comporta o che ti contribuisce un attimino col tempo a rafforzarti, mi piacerebbe molto fosse sfatato questo falso mito, è una tendenza abbastanza in atto anche poi in territori qua vicino, in grandi aziende, per esempio adesso ci son stati questi cambiamenti al vertice tra (nome di aziende del territorio), e non so se a capo di quest'ultima è arrivata una donna come nel settore delegato, una delle famose nipoti o sorelle (nome del cognome), la prima cosa che lei gli ha detto quando è entrata è stata che tutti i part-time esistenti devono essere rivisti e che se la donna ha un figlio più grande di dieci anni, tolto il part-time e torna full-time perché non c'è un motivo sufficiente che la donna sia part-time con un figlio grande e per le posizioni manageriali non se ne parla di donne part-time.

I : Quindi dici, la tendenza è...?

R : Mah ci sono delle tendenze un po' ambivalenti, ora non lo so, questo mi stupisce molto in quanto questa donna è madre, cioè che cosa le rapportiamo? Non possiamo chiuderci in queste categorie: donna, manager, responsabilità, part-time, no non è possibile, non ci sta in questa definizione, questo è abbastanza triste che venga poi da una donna.

I : Mi incuriosiva chiederti, visto che hai detto che comunque la contrattazione che ti ha portato ad ottenere il part-time è stata basata in ogni caso sull'accordo implicito di mantenere gli stessi obbiettivi all'interno di una riduzione di orario, quindi stessi compiti e funzioni ed obbiettivi in un orario ridotto, ma a parità di retribuzione rispetto al full-time oppure con riduzione?

R : Mah, si è cercato di mantenere la parità di retribuzione rispetto al full-time.

I : Ok, quindi non hai avuto orario ridotto, salario ridotto e obbiettivi uguali?

R : Ehh adesso devo vedere perché è partito dal primo di marzo, quindi poi tra alcune cose che erano in ballo già da prima non ho avuto ancora la comprova, perché poi ho lottato molto, sono andata da un consulente del lavoro anche per lamentare l'irregolarità del mio contratto, del contratto di tutti i dipendenti lì dentro, un contratto dove non c'è scritto in modo chiaro la mansione, il titolo e il trattamento economico e a quanto pare questa mia richiesta, da un consulente abbastanza importante da cui ero andata, mi hanno detto che qui ci son tutte le basi per fare una vertenza, anche perché poi in sostanza faccio un lavoro che è del direttore del programma , sostanzialmente sono un direttore esecutivo e ho dovuto lottare abbastanza mi sono molto incavolata nel sostituire proprio il mio titolo, perché prima risultavo una segretaria amministrativa assistente al direttore del programma al ché dico: "guardate raccontiamocela come vogliamo ma poi una cosa di questo tipo con uno “slash”, cioè segretaria amministrativa e le funzioni mie erano quelle proprio di direttore esecutivo, allora prima di tutto mi cambi il titolo.

I : Hai ottenuto questo?

R : Assolutamente sì, non come direttore esecutivo perché altrimenti le sole sarebbero cadute a pioggia, ma non so come si traduca in italiano, non esiste il titolo: executive officer.

I : Ah ok, funzionario esecutivo?

R : Sì, mettiamola così, ma addirittura siamo a livelli allucinanti in questo posto dove il segretario generale mi ha detto: "titolo libero, chiamati come vuoi (...)", qualsiasi cosa allora lì io appena dovrei cominciare una lotta nel fare capire che il titolo è una cosa importante perché rispecchia in modo molto sintetico tutta una serie di funzioni, dà dignità a quello che tu stai facendo e non può essere attribuito liberamente e arbitrariamente dal dipendente spesso, anche perché era un riconoscimento, è come dire: "azienda, ma ci siamo? Ma siamo connessi qua allo stesso livello?". Cioè tu non puoi abusare...

I : Certo se poi tu ti firmi nelle tue lettere come program manager o program officer e nel tuo contratto ma nel tuo contratto c'è scritto: "segretaria amministrativa" e la retribuzione è quella di una funzione di segretaria amministrativa...

R : Anche su questa stavamo per fare una vertenza, abbiamo esaminato proprio tutte le task che io ho classificato come job classifications, cioè quello che io effettivamente faccio rispetto a quello originariamente prodotto nella call c'è un divario che non sto neanche a spiegarti e già le cose che io effettivamente faccio dovrebbero essere (scusa il gioco di parole) inquadrate proprio a livello quadro, quindi non puoi partire da un terzo livello e fare il lavoro di un quadro e questo non ti è riconosciuto, quindi c'è stata un po' di diatriba anche su questo, non ci siamo arrivati completamente ma a me non interessa particolarmente ambire a dei titoli, io dico però: "chiamiamo le cose come stanno" e su questo non potevano che essere concordi, poi lì in questo posto è una gestione un po' particolare perché siamo tutti un po' responsabili di un'unità quindi nessuno bene sa quello che fa l'altro e tanto meno i capi che sono poi i registi ma che non entrano nel merito proprio della specificità insomma, dobbiamo raggiungere quello, la complessità la gestisci un po' tu. Qua c'è uno scollamento proprio tra consapevolezza di ciò che succede all'interno degli uffici, del livello di stress, di frustrazione e quindi in ordine di tempo questo secondo, la concessione del part-time, mi chiedo spesso quanti uomini, un uomo potrebbe essere legittimato, spinto perché a chiedere un part-time in quanto questo, quanti anni dovranno passare prima che invece ci sia una parità anche nell'altro senso, però questo è un altro capitolo.

I : Va bene, penso che possiamo chiudere qui, è abbastanza chiara e penso anche significativa l'esperienza che hai raccontato.

R : Grazie.

Metadata

Other Topic categories:
CHILDHOOD / FAMILY LIFE / RELATIONSHIPS
Key actors: 
myself, partner, children, employer
Tags:
caring/carer/care giver, motherhood, career path, labour conditions, occupation/job, part time/full time, reconciliation private/professional, salary/income/allowance
Female, 37 Italy

Gender did matter

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • EIGE's secretariat
  •  +370 5 215 7400
  • Contact form

Find us

image of map

Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

Media enquiries

  • Georgie Bradley
  •  +370 6 982 7826
  • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

EIGE in social media

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Youtube
  • Follow us on Linkedin
EIGE logo
Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
 

© 2023 European Institute for Gender Equality

Help us improve

Take me to top

  • Web Accessibility
  • Legal notices
  • Personal Data Protection
  • Cookies Policy
  • The UK on EIGE's website
  • Contact us
  • Login