• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
European Institute for Gender Equality logoEuropean Institute for Gender Equality
Search

Search form

English
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
        • What is gender budgeting?
          • Introducing gender budgeting
          • Gender budgeting in women’s and men’s lived realities
          • What does gender budgeting involve in practice?
          • Gender budgeting in the EU Funds
            • Gender budgeting as a way of complying with EU legal requirements
            • Gender budgeting as a way of promoting accountability and transparency
            • Gender budgeting as a way of increasing participation in budget processes
            • Gender budgeting as a way of advancing gender equality
        • Why is gender budgeting important in the EU Funds?
          • Three reasons why gender budgeting is crucial in the EU Funds
        • How can we apply gender budgeting in the EU Funds? Practical tools and Member State examples
          • Tool 1: Connecting the EU Funds with the EU’s regulatory framework on gender equality
            • Legislative and regulatory basis for EU policies on gender equality
            • Concrete requirements for considering gender equality within the EU Funds
            • EU Funds’ enabling conditions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 2: Analysing gender inequalities and gender needs at the national and sub-national levels
            • Steps to assess and analyse gender inequalities and needs
            • Step 1. Collect information and disaggregated data on the target group
            • Step 2. Identify existing gender inequalities and their underlying causes
            • Step 3. Consult directly with the target groups
            • Step 4. Draw conclusions
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 3: Operationalising gender equality in policy objectives and specific objectives/measures
            • Steps for operationalising gender equality in Partnership Agreements and Operational Programmes
            • General guidance on operationalising gender equality when developing policy objectives, specific objectives and measures
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Partnership Agreements
            • Checklist for putting the horizontal principle of gender equality into practice in Operational Programmes
            • Examples of integrating gender equality as a horizontal principle in policy objectives and specific objectives
          • Tool 4: Coordination and complementarities between the EU Funds to advance work-life balance
            • Steps for enhancing coordination and complementarities between the funds
            • Step 1. Alignment with the EU’s strategic engagement goals for gender equality and national gender equality goals
            • Steps 2 and 3. Identifying and developing possible work-life balance interventions
            • Step 4. Following-up through the use of indicators within M&E systems
            • Fictional case study 1: reconciling paid work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 2: reconciling shift work and childcare
            • Fictional case study 3: balancing care for oneself and others
            • Fictional case study 4: reconciling care for children and older persons with shift work
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 5: Defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Steps for defining partnerships and multi-level governance
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 6: Developing quantitative and qualitative indicators for advancing gender equality
            • Steps to develop quantitative and qualitative indicators
            • ERDF and Cohesion Fund
            • ESF+
            • EMFF
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 7: Defining gender-sensitive project selection criteria
            • Steps to support gender-sensitive project development and selection
            • Checklist to guide the preparation of calls for project proposals
            • Checklist for project selection criteria
            • Supplementary tool 7.a: Gender-responsive agreements with project implementers
          • Tool 8: Tracking resource allocations for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Tool 9: Mainstreaming gender equality in project design
            • Steps to mainstream gender equality in project design
            • Step 1. Alignment with partnership agreements’ and Operational Programmes’ gender objectives and indicators
            • Step 2. Project development and application
            • Step 3. Project implementation
            • Step 4. Project assessment
          • Tool 10: Integrating a gender perspective in monitoring and evaluation processes
            • Steps to integrate a gender perspective in M&E processes
            • Additional resources
          • Tool 11: Reporting on resource spending for gender equality in the EU Funds
            • Tracking expenditures for gender equality
            • Additional resources
          • References
          • Abbreviations
          • Acknowledgements
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
  • Home
  • Gender stereotypes
  • Search for gender stories

My personal story

PrintDownload as PDF
Narrative
Country: Ireland
Sex:
Male
Primary Topic:
CHILDHOOD / FAMILY LIFE / RELATIONSHIPS
Year:
1950, 2010

R: I suppose the thing that hits me most as a man that is coming to the end of his working life is the impact of how I saw my need to work and be successful very much driven by my understanding of what a man was. I had a very, very successful career in advertising up to 10 years ago. And rose to the top of Irish advertising and that was really about all I knew what to do, was to work and which is what I always assumed was the right thing to be doing. From a very early stage. As a young man, I married early - I'm in the same relationship since 1972 - and in early 72 we went travelling and married in 1972 while we were away, married in Jerusalem. I came home, got my hair cut - although it doesn't look like it (he has got long hair and a beard) - but I got my hair cut, bought a suit and got a job. And set about that whole utterly middle class thing of making a home and building a career. And my task was to provide. That was kind of the beginning and end of it. I have three children that are now grown and my experience with my grandchildren. And 2 of my daughters between them, have, have 5 children - my experience of how I experience my grandchildren now is very different from how I experienced my children, because I was working and I was working furiously, 60 to 70 hours a week to create a career. And not create a career ... in a planned fashion, but to work and to keep working and to earn well. So that sense of myself was really about work.

I: Your work was the central aspect of your identity?

R: Absolutely! If I was asked, that was it! Being a father was second hand. You know, second class and being a husband, whatever that meant then, being a husband and being a father was actually about working then and providing. I bought a home very early. In Ireland certainly middle class people bought homes and now it is much broader, home ownership is much broader, but ownership is a universal ambition here in Ireland, rather than renting.

I: It's exactly the same in Belgium.

R: Previously if you were a renter, you would probably be renting from the state or the local authority and you were less successful and you were more likely to be working or non-working, non-working class. So, all of those things. So, quite quickly I became quite successful because of you work really hard, if you work obsessively, you get really well rewarded for, you get paid more, you get promoted, you're head hunted and for 25 years I never applied for a job. I was always offered a job or head hunted. Because the industry I was in was quite small, I became known and understood to be. And I moved through a variety of specialities and I just acquired experience and expertise and a reputation by working very, very hard. That was very much driven and I never questioned it. I remembered I worked in advertising and advertising related businesses and I remember in the late '80 I went to work for Company A and I was responsible for the advertising of Company A, which is the kind of pinnacle of the best advertising job in Ireland. And the company was also a long traditional huge employer in Ireland and in Dublin, with a huge reputation for an extremely paternalistic approach in terms of taking care of its employees, all aspects of its employees. So, for the first time my mother was absolutely delighted that I had a respectable job rather than a 'fly by night' type of job or whatever. So, I had achieved some kind of sense of success in her head. I mean, I stayed less than 2 years because I could not live within the organisation, because it was highly structured and layered didn't allow very much independent thought - and I went back to advertising agencies - but that sense of ... yeah... success, yes, that was really around. Ok, I was providing, I had a nice home, you know, as my children grew and they took the secondary school, one of the things that... you're able to do in Ireland is pay for secondary education of a different level - whether it is better or not is an open question - basically private secondary education. I was able to pay for that and I was able to have holidays and all of that kind of things, two cars, etc. They were the outward bits of success. And I was doing everything that I should be doing.

I: How about your wife, did she work?

R: She worked at home, she raised the children and took care of the house.

I: But she didn't have a paid job?

R: No, she didn't have a paid job.

I: And did she appreciate the fact that you were working so hard or did it give tension in the relationship?

R: No, there wasn't tension in the relationship and that was to do with both of us I suppose. One is that I was doing this and she felt very secure and that was a very huge need of hers that I recognise now and so does she and... But, yes, and we both came from traditions that our families were - don't talk about it - that kind of [incomprehensible word] over the door if there was a [incomprehensible word] over the door. Don't mention it if it wasn't a problem, would have been the way and that's the way we were for a long time and so we've gone with it, it was the process. So, that was another stereotype that I just got on with it and...

I: It wasn't really questioned. That's the way things were?

R: It wasn't really questioned, that's the way things were! (Nodding approvingly) and the other stereotype: I've been stoic in dealing with this rather than talking about it, would have been the way of a man. I suppose I grew up in a household were there was persistent violence on behalf of my father and anything that I was doing that wasn't that - as I sat out to do NOT that - would have been, so therefore was good. That was the strong influence that was there.

I: A strong influence in what way?

R: To insure that I wasn't becoming that in any fashion. Yeah...

I: And so becoming professionally successfully was something else than what your father was?

R: Yeah, absolutely. I mean I grew up in a middle class household, he was a kind of accountant, auditor, in a large family, but there was this persistent violence so... and they... so, and that was never spoken about and that was the un-said thing, it was: 'get on with it'. And it was: don't say anything in case it causes anything, so the tradition was that: don't cause conflict!

I: Don't rock the boat!

R: Yeah, so those... and...
(…)

R: And I started working.

I: And then you felt you had to prove that you would be a different type of father?

R: Yes, yes, that was a journey! I became a father when I was 25 for the first time and so I didn't know how little I knew and my wife was 21 or 22, so a young woman. So here we were with 2 and the children are 5 years apart, so we got better at it!

I: Yes, learning by doing.

R: Yeah! And it was that time, not this time, that when I look back it is very different. Now there is a whole lot more information out there. You know, I watch my daughters and they're mothering and they are learning about mothering and it is very different from when we... we had 2 books: there was 'Dr. Spock' and there was a book called 'Every woman', which was a kind of handbook. But it was only, ‘Spock’ was about babies and 'Every woman' was about women and their bodies, substantially their bodies, there was nothing that might tell me about being a father and all I had was this model that I had conflict with and did not want to become.

I: So you knew what you did not want to be?

R: Yeah!

I: I think that's something that comes up very often nowadays with masculinity. Most men know what they don't want to be because there is such a negative picture on masculinity and so little positive role models.

R: Yes, and I think - I heard a lot of men talk about it - is that in fact in their needing to want NOT be something, they actually become a significant piece of that. I discovered - my youngest child is now 25 - and by the time he was 10 I had basically constructed a very similar relationship with him as I had had with my father, which was quite distant and harsh and stern and adult-to-adult. And it was what clicked me into changing, the way I lived and the way I thought and the way I was. You know, I set out to change that very directly in the mid-90.

I: Tell me about the change...

R: The change was really about: 'ok, what kind of a man do I want to be?' and: 'what do I want to do and how do I want to be in the world?' and 'How do I learn how to be the man that I want to be?' and I became involved in men's groups and men's development and just awareness, the way things were for me and ... it took me about 5 years to... I stopped working insanely in 2000, to slow down I work an awful less, and as you know I turned 60 this week. I looked around in 2000, I looked around at my colleagues where I was working and I realised that most of them are 10 years younger than me and suddenly I realised: 'I don't want to do this, work this way anymore. I don't want to work this hard, actually I don't need to earn as much money as I was then. I was earning about close to a quarter million Euros a year at that stage, right at the top of that business. To earn that you have to work really, really hard. And I couldn't do it, I lost interest, I couldn't care anymore. And I want to be as involved with other men in men's groups and in working with men and I was much more interested in that. That work certainly doesn't pay a quarter of a million Euros a year (laughs)!!

I: Otherwise, please give me a call! (both laughing)

R: So, yes, I learned to operate with smaller and less flashy cars, I no longer drove fancy Alpha Romeo's and big Jeeps and settled into a much slower pace of living. I didn't do it soon enough, I stopped having regrets about the earlier years, because it has left me now in a place where I can work as much as I want to and I can pick and choose my work. I work sometimes still as a marketing consultant and I choose my people that I want to work with and, on the other side, I work with men and with people that work with men. So, it is two sides and I work for things that I feel passionate about and that give me energy. And it is not so very good right now, the past two years, you know, all about the Irish economy and government spending is cut to ribbons, something like 40 to 60% of my income comes from government spending in one way or another so I'm going through a tight phase. Previously I would have blamed myself for that, about not being successful and not being able to get work and that's a big change for me. To accept that the world has changed and actually I don't have to be able to make it right, which is what I always did. And, you know, I think I constructed a career in making things right. Literally in managing brands and managing people's approach to brands and businesses and the way they thought. That's what I did, you know. I set out to understand people and right across the board, whether it was cars or alcohol or Guinness or politics or divorce, or whatever. That's what I did for a living, you know, making things right. So I realised that I constructed a really good job for men, but it was very, very nerve-racking. Now I work with small groups of men and small businesses. And I can do that on a basis where I can actually built a connection with individuals. And it's much more rewarding, it's easier on me.
(mobile phone of researcher is switched off because it gave signal)

R: So, I suppose that was a significant change and I suppose I have been towards that for 15 years.

I: A really big shift!

R: Yeah, a really big shift!

I: Now, when we talked earlier, you say you start out as a man knowing what you don’t want to become, but you know, not really... being sort of lost in a vacuum of what would you want to become: something successful and an easy way is to go for a successful career. Because that is what a lot of men do. But then...

R: Well, that was the only picture I had of anything because I grew up in a middle class family that valued learning and success in a - not a hugely material way - but 'establishment respect' was, you know. When I got the job in company A, that was success as far as my mother was concerned. That meant I was part of 'the establishment'. It would have been like working for the civil service or the bank or... that level of. The place that company A has in Irish life is very significant and I was very successful with that company so that, so respectability was valued and as you can see. I had never a very big need to be that respectable but that was a family value if you like, I had absorbed that. Although I always kept enough... something - I've always kept a beard, since 1970 so I've always in some fashion I stepped out of it. And (points to his beard) this lot is now 10 years old so, and it is about to go as well. It is time. ... Sorry, you were saying something else...

I: No, I wanted to ask - since you are working now with a lot of men's groups - do you already have now, let's say, a positive type of masculinity? What would be the essence of a positive role model of masculinity?

R: Right... it really depends on the man. For me, it is about taking responsibility for myself and some sense of autonomy and something about accepting who I am. You know, because I work with a huge variety of groups of men, most of them living on the margins or older men, men coming back from homelessness, men in recovery from addiction, so the common team for me is about responsibility and autonomy. And that, especially men who have been living in struggle, one of the things that happens is that they become dependent and kind of vaguely institutionalised with whatever care system they have been living with. And, holding a place that is: 'yes I will be with you, but no, I will not carry your load' is the stance that I take. I don't know who wrote that, I think it is an American poem that says: 'yes, I can see that huge burden you are carrying and no I will not help you carry it, but I will help you put it down so you can see what it is'. It's that, that's and I think that's the masculinity that I expose and I do it by doing rather than saying. Demonstrated mode list rather than anything else. And the other element is really about feeling and feelings that I want to create in groups. Safety so that feelings can be shown rather than swallowed. And that it is not the end of the world to be one of them, which is everything what we have been taught not to do as men.

I: And that is typically also for masculinity, also to swallow?

R: Yes, that is the default we were taught very early on: 'Big boys don't cry, stand up dry your tears, be quite, swallow!'. Those words: Swallow that vulnerability and you know we were also taught that our feelings don't matter. You know, if I am not allowed to show them... my learning is that well, they don't. So, we could push them down in one fashion or another. And as we grow older and have access to self-medication, we medicate them away, with alcohol or other substances. And so, acknowledging that and creating for me a powerful masculinity is creating this space where men together can express those and be safe and acknowledging each other’s struggle and not be successful and not be competitive so that we can be together.

I: It is a very complex relationship isn't it between vulnerability and responsibility (respondent nods heavily) and really be able to stand on that edge of taking your own responsibility and yet not closing too much down so that you would lose your vulnerability?

R: Yes, that's right and it is this stance of and it is why I use autonomy. A really powerful word that says, well, you know, and defining it so that: ‘yes, I stand here in everything that I am’.

I: And what about ‘connectiveness’? Belonging? Because that is something that has been very developed in femininity and how ... ?

R: Yes, for me the ‘connectiveness’, because we are taught to compete and sometimes violently compete and we are taught to compete with other men. That's a kind of a default. That's, it creates distance, not connection and to break down that. And one of the first questions that I ask in the group is: 'how do we make it safe for you to be here?' So by talking about safety first of all, recognises that it feels not safe. That's the main thing. And maybe for the first time with some men they are allowed to say that out loud. You know, so you can then speak about confidentiality, you can speak about - there is an Irish habit which we call 'slagging', which is joking about difficulties. And I might be slagged for about my beard, I might be slagged about my hair, and it's gentle, but there is always a potentially hurtful thing in there. So, we then write a set of rules which are about. And I describe that as building community and creating community and belonging. And I do this work with big groups with 60 to 70 men and, you know, by being quite explicit, you can create safety in that kind of a community. And I have found, I can fly halfway across the world and find a group of similar minded men and feel safe with men that I have never met before. Because they ascribe to the same sense. And that is something that women have kind of automatically because they don't have to compete. That's my understanding. I have no academic research back up for it, but that is my understanding of how I grew to be the man I am and how I changed to be the man I am. And by explicitly doing it - there is also something in that explicitness - that works for men. It's about me asking the question: 'What do you need to feel safe here?' That's the autonomy, but it is also an invitation to say what I need and so is an invitation to vulnerability, so there's two sides to it. And that is not just: show my feelings. I had one men look me in the eye and point to a men across the circle and say: 'I need him to put his weapon in the car'. And the other man, stands up, leaves out and goes out to his van and comes back without his jacket. I have no idea what the weapon was, but this kind of thing... well, I have a good idea what the weapon was because this was a group that was involved in serious crime. But that was a really explicit physical safety issue. But it could be just I need people to say that they will hold what happens here confidentially. Whatever it is, but it actually says to you: 'What do you need? And it allows both of those extremes. A man might say: 'well, there are times when I'm not able to talk or I don't want to talk' and then I need that respected. So, whatever the... so that's the autonomy and that's asking the group to respect his need, which builds the connection, and builds the safety. That's how we, the way I see it, that's how we create community, by asking something of it. And then offering something to it.

I: I was wondering also, the big change that you went through with regards to your masculine identity, how did it influence your relationship with your wife?

R: Hugely, hugely! First of all, I was available more. I was there, significantly more. I was offering more and asking for more. And we separated and we went back together and in the past as the children grew and moved away, we became one. We were around each other more. We now both work from home. And as my wife said - she works as an aroma therapist and she works with another therapy called neurodevelopment which is working with children that are dyslexic or so - so we spend a lot of time in the same place together and as the children grew and left we were now at the stage where there is just the two of us. There was the two of us and the dog. Three years ago there was two of us, the dog and my son. And now we have more time which we work at spending together and, yeah... we are, now are conscious about the relationship rather that unconscious of it and working at it. And I suppose, I'm 60, I have another 20 years and that will be the span of the relationship. So that is another 20 years together and more and more of it will be together. And we have a house in the country and when the recession changes we'd sell the house in Dublin and live from the country. And yeah... we moved into a slower relationship and a closer relationship is my sense of it.

I: Nice, you gained quality!

R: Yes, yes, yes, and fortunately we have a house in the country because I did all that work. It did pay off. And it is on that kind of basis, I now drive a small old car. And she drives a small old car. We don't need huge big station wagons. It was lovely to have them and drive around Europe. That was great at the time but...

I: That is not what life is about...?

R: Not a lot, no, it was filling gaps! And, yeah, it was, I suppose, I now take a lot less responsibility in that relationship than I would have previously.

I: What sort of responsibility?

R: In all kinds of things: like solving problems. An awful lot I hear myself saying things like: ‘I don't know’. Where previously I would work out an answer or find an answer. I'm not the one that sorts out where we buy our electricity anymore. You know, so I discovered that our electricity supplier has changed and I don't even have to know the why. And that was never the relationship. I was the one that lived in the business world if you like, and the world at large, and she took care of the house herself and took care of me to a significant degree and the children and it was, you know, a very traditional balance. I suspect the things that was, she managed all of the funds. I just earned all of the money, it went into the bank and she managed all of that. And there was always lots of money there, so it was never an issue. Our background is a large working class family and her habit would have been not to spend, so we always lived well but never hugely.

I: Ok, thank you very much!

Metadata

Other Topic categories:
EDUCATION
IDENTITY
LEISURE
PROFESSIONAL CAREER
SOCIETAL CONTEXT
VIOLENCE
Tags:
breadwinner, caring/carer/care giver, conflict, family life, fatherhood, housewife/houseman, marriage/co-habitation, responsibility, roles/role pattern, support, upbringing, prejudice, school, (not) questioning/(no) doubts, (un-) happiness, behaviour, fulfilment, masculinity, ownership, peer group, role model, weak(-ness), holidays, (un)-paid work, ambition, career path, occupation/job, salary/income/allowance, consumption, house/housing, urban context, physical violence, psychological violence, safety
Male, 60 Ireland

Gender did matter

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • EIGE's secretariat
  •  +370 5 215 7400
  • Contact form

Find us

image of map

Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

Media enquiries

  • Georgie Bradley
  •  +370 6 982 7826
  • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

EIGE in social media

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Youtube
  • Follow us on Linkedin
EIGE logo
Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
 

© 2023 European Institute for Gender Equality

Help us improve

Take me to top

  • Web Accessibility
  • Legal notices
  • Personal Data Protection
  • Cookies Policy
  • The UK on EIGE's website
  • Contact us
  • Login