• Skip to language switcher
  • Skip to main categories navigation
  • Skip to secondary categories navigation
  • Skip to current category navigation
  • Skip to main navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Gender mainstreaming

  • What is Gender mainstreaming
    • Policy cycle
  • Institutions and structures
    • European Union
    • EU Member States
    • Stakeholders
    • International organizations
  • Policy areas
    • Agriculture and rural development
      • Policy cycle
    • Culture
      • Policy cycle
    • Digital agenda
      • Policy cycle
    • Economic and financial affairs
      • #3 Steps Forward
        • How can you make a difference?
      • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
      • Policy cycle
    • Education
      • Policy cycle
    • Employment
      • Policy cycle
      • Structures
    • Energy
      • Policy cycle
    • Entrepreneurship
      • Policy cycle
    • Environment and climate change
      • Policy cycle
    • Health
      • Policy cycle
    • Justice
      • Policy cycle
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
      • Policy cycle
    • Migration
      • Policy cycle
    • Poverty
      • Policy cycle
    • Regional policy
      • Policy cycle
    • Research
      • Policy cycle
    • Security
      • Policy cycle
    • Sport
      • Policy cycle
    • Tourism
      • Policy cycle
    • Transport
      • Policy cycle
    • Youth
      • Policy cycle
  • Toolkits
    • Gender Equality Training
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Gender Equality Training
      • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
      • Who should use Gender Equality Training
      • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Assess the needs
          • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
          • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
          • 4. Write good terms of reference
          • 5. Select a trainer
        • Implementation phase
          • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
          • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
          • 8. Invite others to join in
          • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
          • 11. Assess long-term impacts
          • 12. Give space and support others
      • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Equality Training in the EU
      • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
      • More resources on Gender Equality Training
      • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
    • Gender Impact Assessment
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Gender Impact Assessment
      • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
      • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
      • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
      • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
        • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
        • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
        • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
        • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
        • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
      • Following up on gender impact assessment
      • General considerations
      • Examples from the EU
        • European Union
          • European Commission
        • National level
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Denmark
          • Finland
          • Sweden
        • Regional level
          • Basque country
          • Catalonia
        • Local level
          • Lower Saxony
          • Swedish municipalities
    • Institutional Transformation
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is Institutional Transformation
        • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
        • Gender organisations
        • Types of institutions
        • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
        • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
      • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
        • Motivation model
      • Who the guide is for
      • Guide to Institutional Transformation
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
          • 2. Allocating resources
          • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
          • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
        • Implementation phase
          • 5. Establishing a support structure
          • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
          • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
          • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
          • 9. Developing gender equality competence
          • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
          • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
          • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
      • Dealing with resistance
        • Discourse level
        • Individual level
        • Organisational level
        • Statements and reactions
      • Checklist: Key questions for change
      • Examples from the EU
        • Preparation phase
          • 1. Strengthening accountability
          • 2. Allocating resources
          • 3. Organisational analysis
          • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
        • Implementation phase
          • 5. Establishing a support structure
          • 6. Setting objectives
          • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
          • 8. Introducing methods and tools
          • 9. Developing Competence
          • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
          • 11. Launching action plans
          • 12. Promoting within an organisation
        • Evaluation and follow-up phase
          • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
    • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
      • Back to toolkit page
      • WHAT
        • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
        • Terms and definitions
        • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
        • About the Gear Tool
      • WHY
        • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
        • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
        • Why change must be structural
        • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
      • HOW
        • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
          • Step 1: Getting started
          • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
          • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
        • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
          • Step 1: Getting started
          • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
          • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
          • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
        • GEAR action toolbox
          • Work-life balance and organisational culture
          • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
          • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
          • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
          • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
          • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
          • Data collection and monitoring
          • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
          • GEP development and implementation
          • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
        • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
        • Challenges & resistance
      • WHERE
        • Austria
        • Belgium
        • Bulgaria
        • Croatia
        • Cyprus
        • Czechia
        • Denmark
        • Estonia
        • Finland
        • France
        • Germany
        • Greece
        • Hungary
        • Ireland
        • Italy
        • Latvia
        • Lithuania
        • Luxembourg
        • Malta
        • Netherlands
        • Poland
        • Portugal
        • Romania
        • Slovakia
        • Slovenia
        • Spain
        • Sweden
        • United Kingdom
    • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
      • Back to toolkit page
      • What is the tool for?
      • Who is the tool for?
      • How to use the tool
      • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
        • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
          • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
          • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
        • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
          • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
          • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
        • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
          • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
          • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
        • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
          • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
          • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
        • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
          • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
          • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
      • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
      • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
        • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
        • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
        • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
        • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
        • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
      • Glossary of terms
      • References and resources
    • Gender Budgeting
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Für wen ist dieses Toolkit gedacht?
      • Warum ist die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung für die europäischen Fonds in geteilter Verwaltung von Bedeutung?
        • Drei Gründe, warum es wichtig ist, den Gleichstellungsaspekt bei der Haushaltsplanung für die EU-Fonds zu berücksichtigen
      • Was ist die Berücksichtigung von Gleichstellungsaspekten bei der Haushaltsplanung?
        • Einführung der Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung
        • Was hat die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung mit den Lebenswirklichkeiten von Frauen und Männern zu tun?
        • Was umfasst die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung in der Praxis?
        • Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung im Rahmen der EU-Fonds
          • Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als Form der Einhaltung von EU-Rechtsvorschriften
          • Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als eine Form der Förderung der Rechenschaftspflicht und Transparenz bei der öffentlichen Haushaltsplanung und Verwaltung
          • Die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als Weg, um die Teilnahme von Frauen und Männern an den Haushaltsverfahren zu steigern
          • Die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als Weg zur Förderung der Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern in ihrer gesamten Vielfalt
      • Wie können wir den Gleichstellungsaspekt bei der Haushaltsplanung im Rahmen der EU‑Fonds berücksichtigen? Praktische Instrumente und Beispiele aus den Mitgliedstaaten
        • Instrument 1: Verknüpfung der EU-Fonds mit dem EU-Rechtsrahmen zur Geschlechtergleichstellung
          • Gesetzgeberische und gesetzliche Grundlage für die Gleichstellungspolitik der EU
          • Konkrete Anforderungen für die Berücksichtigung der Geschlechtergleichstellung innerhalb der EU-Fonds
          • Grundlegende Voraussetzungen der EU-Fonds
          • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
        • Instrument 2: Analyse der geschlechtsspezifischen Ungleichheiten und Bedürfnisse auf nationaler und subnationaler Ebene
          • Schritte zur Bewertung und Analyse der geschlechtsspezifischen Ungleichheiten und Bedürfnisse
          • Schritt 1: Erfassung von Informationen und aufgeschlüsselten Daten zur Zielgruppe
          • Schritt 2: Ermittlung der vorhandenen geschlechtsspezifischen Ungleichheiten und der zugrunde liegenden Ursachen
          • Schritt 3: Direkter Austausch mit den Zielgruppen
          • Schritt 4. Schlussfolgerungen ziehen
          • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
        • Instrument 3: Operationalisierung der Geschlechtergleichstellung in den politischen Zielsetzungen (in Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen) und spezifischen Zielsetzungen/ Maßnahmen (in operationellen Programmen)
          • Schritte zur Operationalisierung der Geschlechtergleichstellung in Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen und operationellen Programmen
          • Allgemeine Leitlinien zur Operationalisierung der Geschlechtergleichstellung bei der Entwicklung der politischen Zielsetzungen, spezifischen Ziele und Maßnahmen
          • Checkliste für die Umsetzung des bereichsübergreifenden Grundsatzes der Gleichstellung der Geschlechter in Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen
          • Checkliste für die Umsetzung des bereichsübergreifenden Grundsatzes der Gleichstellung der Geschlechter in operationellen Programmen
          • Beispiele für die Integration der Geschlechtergleichstellung als bereichsübergreifender Grundsatz in die politischen Ziele und spezifischen Zielsetzungen
        • Instrument 4: Koordinierung der EU-Fonds zur Verbesserung der Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Privatleben und Komplementaritäten zwischen diesen Fonds
          • Schritte zur Verbesserung der Koordinierung und Komplementarität zwischen den Fonds
          • Schritt 1: Ausrichtung an den Zielen der EU des strategischen Engagements für die Gleichstellung der Geschlechter und an den nationalen Zielen für die Geschlechtergleichstellung
          • Schritte 2 und 3: Ermittlung und Entwicklung möglicher Interventionen zur Verbesserung der Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Privatleben
          • Schritt 4: Nachbereitung durch die Verwendung von Indikatoren im Rahmen der Überwachungs- und Evaluierungssysteme
          • Fiktive Fallstudie 1: Vereinbarkeit von bezahlter Arbeit und Kinderbetreuung
          • Fiktive Fallstudie 2: Vereinbarkeit von Schichtarbeit und Kinderbetreuung
          • Fiktive Fallstudie 3: Ausgleich zwischen Versorgungsarbeit für sich und andere
          • Fiktive Fallstudie 4: Vereinbarkeit von Pflege und Betreuung von Kindern und älteren Personen mit der Schichtarbeit
          • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
        • Instrument 5: Festlegung von Partnerschaften und Steuerung auf mehreren Ebenen – Identifizierung der relevanten Partnerinnen und Partner, die Rolle von Gleichstellungsexpertinnen und -experten und die Zusammensetzung der Überwachungsausschüsse
          • Schritte für die Festlegung von Partnerschaften und Steuerung auf mehreren Ebenen
          • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
        • Instrument 6: Ausarbeitung von quantitativen und qualitativen Indikatoren für die Förderung der Geschlechtergleichstellung
          • Schritte für die Entwicklung von quantitativen und qualitativen Indikatoren
          • EFRE und Kohäsionsfonds (die gleichen gemeinsamen Indikatoren)
          • Europäischer Sozialfonds Plus
          • Europäischer Meeres- und Fischereifonds
          • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
        • Instrument 7: Festlegung der gleichstellungsorientierten Kriterien für die Auswahl der Vorhaben
          • Schritte zur Unterstützung der gleichstellungsorientierten Entwicklung und Auswahl von Vorhaben
          • Checkliste für die Ausarbeitung von Aufforderungen zur Einreichung von Vorschlägen für Vorhaben
          • Checkliste für die Kriterien zur Auswahl der Vorhaben
          • Zusätzliches Instrument 7.a: Geschlechtergerechte Vereinbarungen mit den Projektträgern
        • Instrument 8: Nachverfolgung der Mittelzuweisungen für die Geschlechtergleichstellung bei den EU-Fonds
          • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
          • The tracking system
          • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
          • Step 1: Ex ante approach
          • Step 2: Ex post approach
          • Examples of Step 2a
          • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
          • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
        • Instrument 9: Einbeziehung der Geschlechtergleichstellung bei der Konzipierung des Projekts
          • Schritte für die Einbeziehung der Geschlechtergleichstellung bei der Konzipierung des Projekts
          • Schritt 1: Ausrichtung an den Gleichstellungszielen und Indikatoren der Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen und operationellen Programme
          • Schritt 2: Entwicklung des Vorhabens und Antrag
          • Schritt 3. Umsetzung des Vorhabens
          • Schritt 4. Beurteilung des Vorhabens
        • Instrument 10: Berücksichtigung der Geschlechterperspektive bei den Überwachungs- und Evaluierungsverfahren
          • Schritte zur Einbeziehung der Geschlechterperspektive in die Überwachungs- und Evaluierungsverfahren
          • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
        • Instrument 11: Berichterstattung zur Mittelverwendung für die Geschlechtergleichstellung im Rahmen der EU-Fonds
          • Nachverfolgung der Ausgaben für die Geschlechtergleichstellung
          • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
      • Ressourcen
        • Literaturverzeichnis
        • Abkürzungen
        • Danksagung
    • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Who is this toolkit for?
        • Guiding you through the toolkit
      • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
        • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
        • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
      • Why is gender-responsive public procurement important?
        • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
        • Why was this toolkit produced
      • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
        • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
        • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
        • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
        • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
        • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
        • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
        • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
        • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
      • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
        • Pre-procurement stage
          • Needs assessment
          • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
          • Preliminary market consultation
          • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
          • Defining the subject matter of the contract
          • Choosing the procedure
          • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
          • Dividing the contract into lots
          • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
          • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
          • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
          • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
          • Reserved contracts
          • Preparing tender documents
        • Procurement stage
          • Exclusion grounds
          • Selection criteria
          • Technical specifications
          • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
          • Award criteria
          • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
          • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
          • Use of labels/certifications
        • Post-procurement stage
          • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
          • Subcontracting
          • Monitoring
          • Reporting
          • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
      • References
      • Additional resources
  • Methods and tools
    • Browse
    • About EIGE's methods and tools
    • Gender analysis
    • Gender audit
    • Gender awareness-raising
    • Gender budgeting
    • Gender impact assessment
    • Gender equality training
    • Gender-responsive evaluation
    • Gender statistics and indicators
    • Gender monitoring
    • Gender planning
    • Gender-responsive public procurement
    • Gender stakeholder consultation
    • Sex-disaggregated data
    • Institutional transformation
    • Examples of methods and tools
    • Resources
  • Good practices
    • Browse
    • About good practices
    • EIGE’s approach to good practices
  • Country specific information
    • Belgium
      • Overview
    • Bulgaria
      • Overview
    • Czechia
      • Overview
    • Denmark
      • Overview
    • Germany
      • Overview
    • Estonia
      • Overview
    • Ireland
      • Overview
    • Greece
      • Overview
    • Spain
      • Overview
    • France
      • Overview
    • Croatia
      • Overview
    • Italy
      • Overview
    • Cyprus
      • Overview
    • Latvia
      • Overview
    • Lithuania
      • Overview
    • Luxembourg
      • Overview
    • Hungary
      • Overview
    • Malta
      • Overview
    • Netherlands
      • Overview
    • Austria
      • Overview
    • Poland
      • Overview
    • Portugal
      • Overview
    • Romania
      • Overview
    • Slovenia
      • Overview
    • Slovakia
      • Overview
    • Finland
      • Overview
    • Sweden
      • Overview
  • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
  • Concepts and definitions
  • Power Up conference 2019
European Institute for Gender Equality logoEuropean Institute for Gender Equality
Search

Search form

English
  • EN - English
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • EN - English
  • BG - Български
  • ES - Español
  • CS - Čeština
  • DA - Dansk
  • DE - Deutsch
  • ET - Eesti
  • EL - Ελληνικά
  • FR - Français
  • GA - Gaeilge
  • HR - Hrvatski
  • IT - Italiano
  • LV - Latviešu valoda
  • LT - Lietuvių kalba
  • RO - Română
  • PT - Português
  • MT - Malti
  • PL - Polski
  • FI - Suomi
  • HU - Magyar
  • NL - Nederlands
  • SK - Slovenčina (slovenský jazyk)
  • SL - Slovenščina (slovenski jezik)
  • SV - Svenska
  • Menu
  • Gender mainstreaming
    • What is Gender mainstreaming
      • Policy cycle
    • Institutions and structures
      • European Union
      • EU Member States
      • Stakeholders
      • International organizations
    • Policy areas
      • Agriculture and rural development
        • Policy cycle
      • Culture
        • Policy cycle
      • Digital agenda
        • Policy cycle
      • Economic and financial affairs
        • #3 Steps Forward
          • How can you make a difference?
        • Economic Benefits of Gender Equality in the EU
        • Policy cycle
      • Education
        • Policy cycle
      • Employment
        • Policy cycle
        • Structures
      • Energy
        • Policy cycle
      • Entrepreneurship
        • Policy cycle
      • Environment and climate change
        • Policy cycle
      • Health
        • Policy cycle
      • Justice
        • Policy cycle
      • Maritime affairs and fisheries
        • Policy cycle
      • Migration
        • Policy cycle
      • Poverty
        • Policy cycle
      • Regional policy
        • Policy cycle
      • Research
        • Policy cycle
      • Security
        • Policy cycle
      • Sport
        • Policy cycle
      • Tourism
        • Policy cycle
      • Transport
        • Policy cycle
      • Youth
        • Policy cycle
    • Toolkits
      • Gender Equality Training
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Equality Training
        • Why invest in Gender Equality Training
        • Who should use Gender Equality Training
        • Step-by-step guide to Gender Equality Training
            • 1. Assess the needs
            • 2. Integrate initiatives to broader strategy
            • 3. Ensure sufficient resources
            • 4. Write good terms of reference
            • 5. Select a trainer
            • 6. Engage in the needs assessment
            • 7. Actively participate in the initiative
            • 8. Invite others to join in
            • 9. Monitoring framework and procedures
            • 10. Set up an evaluation framework
            • 11. Assess long-term impacts
            • 12. Give space and support others
        • Designing effective Gender Equality Training
        • Gender Equality Training in the EU
        • Good Practices on Gender Equality Training
        • More resources on Gender Equality Training
        • More on EIGE's work on Gender Equality Training
      • Gender Impact Assessment
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Gender Impact Assessment
        • Why use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Who should use Gender Impact Assessment
        • When to use Gender Impact Assessment
        • Guide to Gender Impact Assessment
          • Step 1: Definition of policy purpose
          • Step 2: Checking gender relevance
          • Step 3: Gender-sensitive analysis
          • Step 4: Weighing gender impact
          • Step 5: Findings and proposals for improvement
        • Following up on gender impact assessment
        • General considerations
        • Examples from the EU
            • European Commission
            • Austria
            • Belgium
            • Denmark
            • Finland
            • Sweden
            • Basque country
            • Catalonia
            • Lower Saxony
            • Swedish municipalities
      • Institutional Transformation
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is Institutional Transformation
          • Institutional transformation and gender: Key points
          • Gender organisations
          • Types of institutions
          • Gender mainstreaming and institutional transformation
          • Dimensions of gender mainstreaming in institutions: The SPO model
        • Why focus on Institutional Transformation
          • Motivation model
        • Who the guide is for
        • Guide to Institutional Transformation
            • 1. Creating accountability and strengthening commitment
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Conducting an organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and work plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting gender equality objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing gender mainstreaming
            • 9. Developing gender equality competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching gender equality action plans
            • 12. Promotional equal opportunities
            • 13. Monitoring and steering organisational change
        • Dealing with resistance
          • Discourse level
          • Individual level
          • Organisational level
          • Statements and reactions
        • Checklist: Key questions for change
        • Examples from the EU
            • 1. Strengthening accountability
            • 2. Allocating resources
            • 3. Organisational analysis
            • 4. Developing a strategy and working plan
            • 5. Establishing a support structure
            • 6. Setting objectives
            • 7. Communicating gender mainstreaming
            • 8. Introducing methods and tools
            • 9. Developing Competence
            • 10. Establishing a gender information management system
            • 11. Launching action plans
            • 12. Promoting within an organisation
            • 13. Monitoring and evaluating
      • Gender Equality in Academia and Research
        • Back to toolkit page
        • WHAT
          • What is a Gender Equality Plan?
          • Terms and definitions
          • Which stakeholders need to be engaged into a GEP
          • About the Gear Tool
        • WHY
          • Horizon Europe GEP criterion
          • Gender Equality in Research and Innovation
          • Why change must be structural
          • Rationale for gender equality change in research and innovation
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research organisations, universities and public bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR step-by-step guide for research funding bodies
            • Step 1: Getting started
            • Step 2: Analysing and assessing the state-of-play in the institution
            • Step 3: Setting up a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 4: Implementing a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 5: Monitoring progress and evaluating a Gender Equality Plan
            • Step 6: What comes after the Gender Equality Plan?
          • GEAR action toolbox
            • Work-life balance and organisational culture
            • Gender balance in leadership and decision making
            • Gender equality in recruitment and career progression
            • Integration of the sex/gender dimension into research and teaching content
            • Measures against gender-based violence including sexual harassment
            • Measures mitigating the effect of COVID-19
            • Data collection and monitoring
            • Training: awareness-raising and capacity building
            • GEP development and implementation
            • Gender-sensitive research funding procedures
          • Success factors for GEP development and implementation
          • Challenges & resistance
        • WHERE
          • Austria
          • Belgium
          • Bulgaria
          • Croatia
          • Cyprus
          • Czechia
          • Denmark
          • Estonia
          • Finland
          • France
          • Germany
          • Greece
          • Hungary
          • Ireland
          • Italy
          • Latvia
          • Lithuania
          • Luxembourg
          • Malta
          • Netherlands
          • Poland
          • Portugal
          • Romania
          • Slovakia
          • Slovenia
          • Spain
          • Sweden
          • United Kingdom
      • Gender-sensitive Parliaments
        • Back to toolkit page
        • What is the tool for?
        • Who is the tool for?
        • How to use the tool
        • Self-assessment, scoring and interpretation of parliament gender-sensitivity
          • AREA 1 – Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
            • Domain 1 – Electoral system and gender quotas
            • Domain 2 - Political party/group procedures
            • Domain 3 – Recruitment of parliamentary employees
          • AREA 2 – Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
            • Domain 1 – Parliamentarians’ presence and capacity in a parliament
            • Domain 2 – Structure and organisation
            • Domain 3 – Staff organisation and procedures
          • AREA 3 – Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
            • Domain 1 – Gender mainstreaming structures
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming tools in parliamentary work
            • Domain 3 – Gender mainstreaming tools for staff
          • AREA 4 – The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
            • Domain 1 – Gender equality laws and policies
            • Domain 2 – Gender mainstreaming in laws
            • Domain 3 – Oversight of gender equality
          • AREA 5 – The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
            • Domain 1 – Symbolic meanings of spaces
            • Domain 2 – Gender equality in external communication and representation
        • How gender-sensitive are parliaments in the EU?
        • Examples of gender-sensitive practices in parliaments
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to ENTER the parliament
          • Women and men have equal opportunities to INFLUENCE the parliament’s working procedures
          • Women’s interests and concerns have adequate SPACE on parliamentary agenda
          • The parliament produces gender-sensitive LEGISLATION
          • The parliament complies with its SYMBOLIC function
        • Glossary of terms
        • References and resources
      • Gender Budgeting
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Für wen ist dieses Toolkit gedacht?
        • Warum ist die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung für die europäischen Fonds in geteilter Verwaltung von Bedeutung?
          • Drei Gründe, warum es wichtig ist, den Gleichstellungsaspekt bei der Haushaltsplanung für die EU-Fonds zu berücksichtigen
        • Was ist die Berücksichtigung von Gleichstellungsaspekten bei der Haushaltsplanung?
          • Einführung der Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung
          • Was hat die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung mit den Lebenswirklichkeiten von Frauen und Männern zu tun?
          • Was umfasst die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung in der Praxis?
          • Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung im Rahmen der EU-Fonds
            • Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als Form der Einhaltung von EU-Rechtsvorschriften
            • Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als eine Form der Förderung der Rechenschaftspflicht und Transparenz bei der öffentlichen Haushaltsplanung und Verwaltung
            • Die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als Weg, um die Teilnahme von Frauen und Männern an den Haushaltsverfahren zu steigern
            • Die Berücksichtigung des Gleichstellungsaspekts bei der Haushaltsplanung als Weg zur Förderung der Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern in ihrer gesamten Vielfalt
        • Wie können wir den Gleichstellungsaspekt bei der Haushaltsplanung im Rahmen der EU‑Fonds berücksichtigen? Praktische Instrumente und Beispiele aus den Mitgliedstaaten
          • Instrument 1: Verknüpfung der EU-Fonds mit dem EU-Rechtsrahmen zur Geschlechtergleichstellung
            • Gesetzgeberische und gesetzliche Grundlage für die Gleichstellungspolitik der EU
            • Konkrete Anforderungen für die Berücksichtigung der Geschlechtergleichstellung innerhalb der EU-Fonds
            • Grundlegende Voraussetzungen der EU-Fonds
            • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
          • Instrument 2: Analyse der geschlechtsspezifischen Ungleichheiten und Bedürfnisse auf nationaler und subnationaler Ebene
            • Schritte zur Bewertung und Analyse der geschlechtsspezifischen Ungleichheiten und Bedürfnisse
            • Schritt 1: Erfassung von Informationen und aufgeschlüsselten Daten zur Zielgruppe
            • Schritt 2: Ermittlung der vorhandenen geschlechtsspezifischen Ungleichheiten und der zugrunde liegenden Ursachen
            • Schritt 3: Direkter Austausch mit den Zielgruppen
            • Schritt 4. Schlussfolgerungen ziehen
            • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
          • Instrument 3: Operationalisierung der Geschlechtergleichstellung in den politischen Zielsetzungen (in Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen) und spezifischen Zielsetzungen/ Maßnahmen (in operationellen Programmen)
            • Schritte zur Operationalisierung der Geschlechtergleichstellung in Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen und operationellen Programmen
            • Allgemeine Leitlinien zur Operationalisierung der Geschlechtergleichstellung bei der Entwicklung der politischen Zielsetzungen, spezifischen Ziele und Maßnahmen
            • Checkliste für die Umsetzung des bereichsübergreifenden Grundsatzes der Gleichstellung der Geschlechter in Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen
            • Checkliste für die Umsetzung des bereichsübergreifenden Grundsatzes der Gleichstellung der Geschlechter in operationellen Programmen
            • Beispiele für die Integration der Geschlechtergleichstellung als bereichsübergreifender Grundsatz in die politischen Ziele und spezifischen Zielsetzungen
          • Instrument 4: Koordinierung der EU-Fonds zur Verbesserung der Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Privatleben und Komplementaritäten zwischen diesen Fonds
            • Schritte zur Verbesserung der Koordinierung und Komplementarität zwischen den Fonds
            • Schritt 1: Ausrichtung an den Zielen der EU des strategischen Engagements für die Gleichstellung der Geschlechter und an den nationalen Zielen für die Geschlechtergleichstellung
            • Schritte 2 und 3: Ermittlung und Entwicklung möglicher Interventionen zur Verbesserung der Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Privatleben
            • Schritt 4: Nachbereitung durch die Verwendung von Indikatoren im Rahmen der Überwachungs- und Evaluierungssysteme
            • Fiktive Fallstudie 1: Vereinbarkeit von bezahlter Arbeit und Kinderbetreuung
            • Fiktive Fallstudie 2: Vereinbarkeit von Schichtarbeit und Kinderbetreuung
            • Fiktive Fallstudie 3: Ausgleich zwischen Versorgungsarbeit für sich und andere
            • Fiktive Fallstudie 4: Vereinbarkeit von Pflege und Betreuung von Kindern und älteren Personen mit der Schichtarbeit
            • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
          • Instrument 5: Festlegung von Partnerschaften und Steuerung auf mehreren Ebenen – Identifizierung der relevanten Partnerinnen und Partner, die Rolle von Gleichstellungsexpertinnen und -experten und die Zusammensetzung der Überwachungsausschüsse
            • Schritte für die Festlegung von Partnerschaften und Steuerung auf mehreren Ebenen
            • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
          • Instrument 6: Ausarbeitung von quantitativen und qualitativen Indikatoren für die Förderung der Geschlechtergleichstellung
            • Schritte für die Entwicklung von quantitativen und qualitativen Indikatoren
            • EFRE und Kohäsionsfonds (die gleichen gemeinsamen Indikatoren)
            • Europäischer Sozialfonds Plus
            • Europäischer Meeres- und Fischereifonds
            • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
          • Instrument 7: Festlegung der gleichstellungsorientierten Kriterien für die Auswahl der Vorhaben
            • Schritte zur Unterstützung der gleichstellungsorientierten Entwicklung und Auswahl von Vorhaben
            • Checkliste für die Ausarbeitung von Aufforderungen zur Einreichung von Vorschlägen für Vorhaben
            • Checkliste für die Kriterien zur Auswahl der Vorhaben
            • Zusätzliches Instrument 7.a: Geschlechtergerechte Vereinbarungen mit den Projektträgern
          • Instrument 8: Nachverfolgung der Mittelzuweisungen für die Geschlechtergleichstellung bei den EU-Fonds
            • Ensuring gender relevance in EU Funds
            • The tracking system
            • Steps for tracking resource allocations on gender equality
            • Step 1: Ex ante approach
            • Step 2: Ex post approach
            • Examples of Step 2a
            • Annex 1: Ex ante assignment of intervention fields to the gender equality dimension codes
            • Annex 2: The EU’s gender equality legal and policy framework
          • Instrument 9: Einbeziehung der Geschlechtergleichstellung bei der Konzipierung des Projekts
            • Schritte für die Einbeziehung der Geschlechtergleichstellung bei der Konzipierung des Projekts
            • Schritt 1: Ausrichtung an den Gleichstellungszielen und Indikatoren der Partnerschaftsvereinbarungen und operationellen Programme
            • Schritt 2: Entwicklung des Vorhabens und Antrag
            • Schritt 3. Umsetzung des Vorhabens
            • Schritt 4. Beurteilung des Vorhabens
          • Instrument 10: Berücksichtigung der Geschlechterperspektive bei den Überwachungs- und Evaluierungsverfahren
            • Schritte zur Einbeziehung der Geschlechterperspektive in die Überwachungs- und Evaluierungsverfahren
            • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
          • Instrument 11: Berichterstattung zur Mittelverwendung für die Geschlechtergleichstellung im Rahmen der EU-Fonds
            • Nachverfolgung der Ausgaben für die Geschlechtergleichstellung
            • Zusätzliche Ressourcen
          • Literaturverzeichnis
          • Abkürzungen
          • Danksagung
      • Gender-responsive Public Procurement
        • Back to toolkit page
        • Who is this toolkit for?
          • Guiding you through the toolkit
        • What is gender-responsive public procurement?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender equality?
          • How is gender-responsive public procurement linked to gender budgeting?
          • Five reasons why gender-responsive public procurement
          • Why was this toolkit produced
        • Gender-responsive public procurement in practice
          • Legal framework cross-references gender equality and public procurement
          • Public procurement strategies cover GRPP
          • Gender equality action plans or strategies mention public procurement
          • Capacity-building programmes, support structures
          • Regular collaboration between gender equality bodies
          • Effective monitoring and reporting systems on the use of GRPP
          • Tool 1:Self-assessment questionnaire about the legal
          • Tool 2: Overview of the legislative, regulatory and policy frameworks
        • How to include gender aspects in tendering procedures
          • Pre-procurement stage
            • Needs assessment
            • Tool 3: Decision tree to assess the gender relevance
            • Preliminary market consultation
            • Tool 4: Guiding questions for needs assessment
            • Defining the subject matter of the contract
            • Choosing the procedure
            • Tool 5: Decision tree for the choice of procedure for GRPP
            • Dividing the contract into lots
            • Tool 6: Guiding questions for dividing contracts into lots for GRPP
            • Light regime for social, health and other specific services
            • Tool 7: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Tool 8: Guiding questions for applying GRPP under the light regime
            • Reserved contracts
            • Preparing tender documents
          • Procurement stage
            • Exclusion grounds
            • Selection criteria
            • Technical specifications
            • Tool 9: Decision tree for setting GRPP selection criteria
            • Award criteria
            • Tool 10: Formulating GRPP award criteria
            • Tool 11: Bidders’ concepts to ensure the integration of gender aspects
            • Use of labels/certifications
          • Post-procurement stage
            • Tool 12: Checklist for including GRPP contract performance conditions
            • Subcontracting
            • Monitoring
            • Reporting
            • Tool 13: Template for a GRPP monitoring and reporting plan
        • References
        • Additional resources
    • Methods and tools
      • Browse
      • About EIGE's methods and tools
      • Gender analysis
      • Gender audit
      • Gender awareness-raising
      • Gender budgeting
      • Gender impact assessment
      • Gender equality training
      • Gender-responsive evaluation
      • Gender statistics and indicators
      • Gender monitoring
      • Gender planning
      • Gender-responsive public procurement
      • Gender stakeholder consultation
      • Sex-disaggregated data
      • Institutional transformation
      • Examples of methods and tools
      • Resources
    • Good practices
      • Browse
      • About good practices
      • EIGE’s approach to good practices
    • Country specific information
      • Belgium
        • Overview
      • Bulgaria
        • Overview
      • Czechia
        • Overview
      • Denmark
        • Overview
      • Germany
        • Overview
      • Estonia
        • Overview
      • Ireland
        • Overview
      • Greece
        • Overview
      • Spain
        • Overview
      • France
        • Overview
      • Croatia
        • Overview
      • Italy
        • Overview
      • Cyprus
        • Overview
      • Latvia
        • Overview
      • Lithuania
        • Overview
      • Luxembourg
        • Overview
      • Hungary
        • Overview
      • Malta
        • Overview
      • Netherlands
        • Overview
      • Austria
        • Overview
      • Poland
        • Overview
      • Portugal
        • Overview
      • Romania
        • Overview
      • Slovenia
        • Overview
      • Slovakia
        • Overview
      • Finland
        • Overview
      • Sweden
        • Overview
    • EIGE’s publications on Gender mainstreaming
    • Concepts and definitions
    • Power Up conference 2019
  • Gender-based violence
    • What is gender-based violence?
    • Forms of violence
    • EIGE’s work on gender-based violence
    • Administrative data collection
      • Data collection on violence against women
        • The need to improve data collection
        • Advancing administrative data collection on Intimate partner violence and gender-related killings of women
        • Improving police and justice data on intimate partner violence against women in the European Union
        • Developing EU-wide terminology and indicators for data collection on violence against women
        • Mapping the current status and potential of administrative data sources on gender-based violence in the EU
      • About the tool
      • Administrative data sources
      • Advanced search
    • Analysis of EU directives from a gendered perspective
    • Costs of gender-based violence
    • Cyber violence against women
    • Femicide
    • Intimate partner violence and witness intervention
    • Female genital mutilation
      • Risk estimations
    • Risk assessment and risk management by police
      • Risk assessment principles and steps
          • Principle 1: Prioritising victim safety
          • Principle 2: Adopting a victim-centred approach
          • Principle 3: Taking a gender-specific approach
          • Principle 4: Adopting an intersectional approach
          • Principle 5: Considering children’s experiences
          • Step 1: Define the purpose and objectives of police risk assessment
          • Step 2: Identify the most appropriate approach to police risk assessment
          • Step 3: Identify the most relevant risk factors for police risk assessment
          • Step 4: Implement systematic police training and capacity development
          • Step 5: Embed police risk assessment in a multiagency framework
          • Step 6: Develop procedures for information management and confidentiality
          • Step 7: Monitor and evaluate risk assessment practices and outcomes
      • Risk management principles and recommendations
        • Principle 1. Adopting a gender-specific approach
        • Principle 2. Introducing an individualised approach to risk management
        • Principle 3. Establishing an evidence-based approach
        • Principle 4. Underpinning the processes with an outcome-focused approach
        • Principle 5. Delivering a coordinated, multiagency response
      • Legal and policy framework
      • Tools and approaches
      • Areas for improvement
      • References
    • Good practices in EU Member States
    • Methods and tools in EU Member States
    • White Ribbon Campaign
      • About the White Ribbon Campaign
      • White Ribbon Ambassadors
    • Regulatory and legal framework
      • International regulations
      • EU regulations
      • Strategic framework on violence against women 2015-2018
      • Legal Definitions in the EU Member States
    • Literature and legislation
    • EIGE's publications on gender-based violence
    • Videos
  • Gender Equality Index
    • View countries
    • Compare countries
    • Thematic Focus
    • About Index
    • Publications
    • Forum 2022
    • Index Game
    • Videos
  • Gender Statistics Database
    • Browse Gender Statistics
    • Data talks
    • FAQs
    • About
    • Search
  • Beijing Platform for Action
  • Countries
    • Belgium
    • Bulgaria
    • Czechia
    • Denmark
    • Germany
    • Estonia
    • Ireland
    • Greece
    • Spain
    • France
    • Croatia
    • Italy
    • Cyprus
    • Latvia
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Hungary
    • Malta
    • Netherlands
    • Austria
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Romania
    • Slovenia
    • Slovakia
    • Finland
    • Sweden
  • Topics
    • Health
      • Covid-19 and gender equality
    • Violence
      • Orange the World
    • Agriculture and rural development
    • Culture
    • Digital agenda
    • Economic and financial affairs
    • Education
    • Employment
    • Energy
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Environment and climate change
    • Justice
    • Maritime affairs and fisheries
    • Migration
    • Poverty
    • Regional policy
    • Research
    • Sport
    • Tourism
    • Transport
    • Youth
  • About EIGE
    • EIGE's organisation
      • Management board
      • Experts' forum
      • EIGE staff
    • Our work
      • Stakeholders
      • EU candidate countries and potential candidates
        • About the IPA project
        • Examples from the region
          • Browse
          • About the examples
        • Gender equality indices in the region
        • Gender statistics in the region
        • Measuring violence against women in the region
      • Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) agencies
    • Projects
      • Running projects
      • Closed projects
    • Planning and reporting documents
    • Documents registry
      • Request for access to EIGE documents
    • Contact us
    • Director’s speeches
  • Recruitment
    • Open vacancies
    • Closed vacancies
    • About Recruitment
    • FAQs
    • Selection procedure appeals
    • Relevant forms and information
    • Welcome guide
  • Procurement
    • Open procedures
    • Closed procedures
    • About Procurement
    • External Experts' Database
  • News
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
    • Past events
    • Gender Equality Forum 2022
      • About
      • Agenda
      • Videos
      • Speakers
      • Practical information
  • EIGE’s publications
    • Gender-sensitive Communication
      • Overview of the toolkit
      • First steps towards more inclusive language
        • Terms you need to know
        • Why should I ever mention gender?
        • Choosing whether to mention gender
        • Key principles for inclusive language use
      • Challenges
        • Stereotypes
          • Avoid gendered pronouns (he or she) when the person’s gender is unknown
          • Avoid irrelevant information about gender
          • Avoid gendered stereotypes as descriptive terms
          • Gendering in-animate objects
          • Using different adjectives for women and men
          • Avoid using stereotypical images
        • Invisibility and omission
          • Do not use ‘man’ as the neutral term
          • Do not use ‘he’ to refer to unknown people
          • Do not use gender-biased nouns to refer to groups of people
          • Take care with ‘false generics’
          • Greetings and other forms of inclusive communication
        • Subordination and trivialisation
          • Naming conventions
          • Patronising language
      • Test your knowledge
        • Quiz 1: Policy document
        • Quiz 2: Job description
        • Quiz 3: Legal text
      • Practical tools
        • Solutions for how to use gender-sensitive language
        • Pronouns
        • Invisibility or omission
        • Common gendered nouns
        • Adjectives
        • Phrases
      • Policy context
    • Work-life balance in the ICT sector
      • Back to toolkit page
      • EU policies on work-life balance
      • Women in the ICT sector
      • The argument for work-life balance measures
        • Challenges
      • Step-by-step approach to building a compelling business case
        • Step 1: Identify national work-life balance initiatives and partners
        • Step 2: Identify potential resistance and find solutions
        • Step 3: Maximise buy-in from stakeholders
        • Step 4: Design a solid implementation plan
        • Step 5: Carefully measure progress
        • Step 6: Highlight benefits and celebrate early wins
      • Toolbox for planning work-life balance measures in ICT companies
      • Work–life balance checklist
    • Gender Equality Index 2019. Work-life balance
      • Back to toolkit page
      • Foreword
      • Highlights
      • Introduction
        • Still far from the finish line
        • Snail’s-pace progress on gender equality in the EU continues
        • More women in decision-making drives progress
        • Convergence on gender equality in the EU
      • 2. Domain of work
        • Gender equality inching slowly forward in a fast-changing world of work
        • Women dominate part-time employment, consigning them to jobs with poorer career progression
        • Motherhood, low education and migration are particular barriers to work for women
      • 3. Domain of money
        • Patchy progress on gender-equal access to financial and economic resources
        • Paying the price for motherhood
        • Lifetime pay inequalities fall on older women
      • 4. Domain of knowledge
        • Gender equality in education standing still even as women graduates outnumber men graduates
        • Both women and men limit their study fields
        • Adult learning stalls most when reskilling needs are greatest
      • 5. Domain of time
        • Enduring burden of care perpetuates inequalities for women
        • Uneven impact of family life on women and men
      • 6. Domain of power
        • More women in decision-making but still a long way to go
        • Democracy undermined by absence of gender parity in politics
        • More gender equality on corporate boards — but only in a few Member States
        • Limited opportunities for women to influence social and cultural decision-making
      • 7. Domain of health
        • Behavioural change in health is key to tackling gender inequalities
        • Women live longer but in poorer health
        • Lone parents and people with disabilities are still without the health support they need
      • 8. Domain of violence
        • Data gaps mask the true scale of gender-based violence in the EU
        • Backlash against gender equality undermines legal efforts to end violence against women
        • Conceptual framework
        • Parental-leave policies
        • Informal care of older people, people with disabilities and long-term care services
        • Informal care of children and childcare services
        • Transport and public infrastructure
        • Flexible working arrangements
        • Lifelong learning
      • 10. Conclusions
    • Sexism at work
      • Background
        • What is sexism?
        • What is the impact of sexism at work?
        • Where does sexism come from?
        • Sexism at work
        • What happens when you violate sexist expectations?
        • What is sexual harassment?
        • Violating sexist expectations can lead to sexual harassment
        • Under-reporting of sexual harassment
      • Part 2. Test yourself
        • How can I combat sexism? A ten-step programme for managers
        • How can all staff create cultural change
        • How can I report a problem?
        • Eradicating sexism to change the face of the EU
    • Upcoming publications
  • Library
    • Search
    • About
  • Glossary & Thesaurus
    • Overview
    • About
    • A-Z Index
    • Browse
    • Search
Toggle sidebar menu
  • Home
  • Gender mainstreaming
  • Country specific information
  • Germany

Family-friendliness as part of a diversity culture at Bosch

PrintDownload as PDF
Good practice
Country: Germany
Section:
Reconciliation
Topics:
Employment
Period:
2011 - 2014
Publication date:
09 March 2015
MORE – Mind-set ORganisation Executives

In brief

The Bosch company, an engineering and electronics multinational based near Stuttgart, employs 280,000 people in 50 countries across the world. It promotes diversity as a driver for innovation, and promotes new approaches to leadership based on results, rather than being present in the workplace.

It has developed a range of policies and awareness-raising activities on the reconciliation for work and family life, which are embedded in a strong culture of equality and diversity. These include a website, a press release, a supplement to the annual report and guidelines on a flexible and family-friendly working culture. The company has received certification and awards for being a family-friendly company, and Charters on Diversity and Family-Friendly Working have been agreed. ‘Family time’ periods can be used as a basis for career development and promotion.

A specific emphasis is given to executives taking family-friendly working hours, so that they can act as disseminators and role models. For a period of three months executives can try out working flexibly from home or part-time – which helps to create a cultural change in the organisation and leadership around flexible working. After the trial period, executives are free to go back to their full-time posts, but in practice 80% of them decide to continue to work flexibly.

The scheme particularly targets executives from research and development departments, as this type of work is less bound to specific locations, and relies on creativity. When the MORE scheme was introduced in 2011, it was enthusiastically received. Over 300 employees applied to take part, so a second round for 650 participants was launched.

The company predominantly employs men and there has been a good take-up of the initiative amongst men. However Bosch also promotes equal opportunities for women, and provides mentoring programmes, the Business Women's Programme (a programme for further training), a women’s network (women@bosch), as well as an annual Girls' Day and Girls' Campus. Its aim is to increase the proportion of women in leadership positions worldwide from 11.2% (in 2012) to 20% (in 2020).

Germany's most family-friendly enterprise

Robert Bosch GmbH is a multinational engineering and electronics company, with annual sales of €46 billion. It is a world leader in the production of car parts such as brakes, starter motors and radios, and also makes industrial control systems, household appliances, power tools and security systems. Based near Stuttgart in Germany, the company employs some 280,000 people in 50 countries.

Bosch has long-term experience of implementing flexible working time models. It has been certified by the German Beruf und Familie (Work and Family) audit and received the Total E-Quality award for family-friendliness and equal opportunities. A Diversity Charter was signed in 2007, and this was followed by a Charter on Family-Friendly Working-Hours in 2011. In 2012 Bosch was awarded the title of Germany's "Most family-friendly enterprise" in the category of large enterprises, and received the Award for Excellence in recognition of its efforts to reconcile career and family from the Japanese Ministry for Health, Labour and Welfare. Also in 2012, the company developed its Guidelines for a flexible and family-friendly working culture, which constitute a self-commitment by the company. Since 2012, employees can invoke "family time" (periods of time spent on care tasks) as a building block for their career with a view to promotion. In addition, there are numerous internal networks (papas@bosch, women@bosch, family@bosch) which allow employees to support each other and exchange experiences.

Leadership based on results

The MORE (Mind-set ORganisa­tion Executives) project is managed by the company’s Central Department for Diversity Management. Flexible working time models have been in place since the mid-1990s with the objective of improving the reconciliation of work and care responsibilities. To date, several hundred part-time models exist at all levels of the company’s hierarchy. The aim of the MORE scheme is to achieve a sustainable change in the working and management culture at Bosch and to promote a wider use of flexible working amongst executives (working from home or part-time) over a period of three months. The purpose of the scheme is to demonstrate the advantages of flexible working time models by enabling executives try them out and act as role models and disseminators for other employees, thus advancing the development of a more flexible and family-conscious working culture at Bosch. In this way, widespread assumptions are questioned, e.g. the assumption that both achievement and leadership are only possible when the person in charge is present over and above the actual working hours. In the process, the scheme promotes new approaches to leadership based on results, rather than being present in the workplace.

Diversity drives innovation

The scheme is embedded in a company-wide diversity strategy which views diversity as a driving force of innovation. Along with the dimensions gender, generations and internationality, family-friendliness/work-life balance constitutes a central building block of this strategy. At Bosch, each of these elements has a clearly defined profile with corresponding measures and instruments. To promote equal opportunities for women, there are, for example, mentoring programmes (internal management level and cross-company), the Business Women's Programme (a programme for further training), a women’s network (women@bosch), as well as an annual Girls' Day and Girls' Campus. Within the key area of gender equality, implemented at Bosch since 1994, the aim is to increase the proportion of women in leadership positions worldwide from 11.2% (in 2012) to 20% (in 2020). At present, one in four female executives works part-time.

The scheme particularly targets executives from research and development departments, as this type of work is less bound to specific locations compared to production departments. The executives concerned gain important experiences which allow them to better assess their own situation and that of their employees and, ultimately, to become better leaders. Functioning as role models they also act as important disseminators in creating a family-conscious working and organisational culture.

Business round tables, which accompany the scheme, allow executives to exchange their experiences with other MORE participants, as well as with non-participants. They are also supported by the Human Resources Department. Participants report that they and their teams have had to get used to not being continually present in the workplace. Initially, self-discipline was required to refrain from answering e-mails on a family day. Also, it was necessary to restructure and reorganise office routines. Overall, the new forms of work have met with positive reactions. The initiative has benefited both the employees and the company. Flexibility has enabled employees to experience positive benefits in their quality of life, resulting in higher satisfaction. From the perspective of the company this has resulted in higher creativity and hence innovation.

Enthusiastic take-up

Originally planned for 125 executives in 2011, more than 300 women and men applied to take part. In the first round of MORE 150 employees participated in the initiative, mostly from Germany. After the three-month period trying out flexible working hours, around 80% of participants decided to continue their flexible working time model (home office, part-time, etc.) even where this resulted in a reduction in income. Due to the positive impact and following great interest from employees, MORE commenced a second round with 650 executives worldwide. MORE addresses leading executives irrespective of gender. Given that 78% of employees are male, more men than women are included in the scheme. The examples published in the company 2012 report are exclusively reports of men describing their experience.

The scheme shows how it is possible to attenuate the associations between "work – maleness – leadership – being present – performance", which had been firmly entrenched in people's minds. Changing company culture and shifting mindsets presupposes that performance has little to do with being at the office; instead the aim is to focus on results and to achieve a better reconciliation of work and life. In this way, care responsibilities not only become a natural part of corporate culture but also of an individuals' working culture – and in the case of Bosch, that of male executives in particular. Thus the scheme contributes substantially to achieving greater gender equality.

One of the success factors of the scheme is the fact that the entire corporate culture of Bosch is oriented towards the reconciliation of work and care. This is firmly established in the company's overall mission statement and also in the Guidelines for a flexible and family-friendly working culture, which the company views as a form of self-commitment. These are signals that the scheme and its objectives are supported and appreciated by senior management. This has not only enhanced the acceptance of the scheme but may also explain the willingness of many executives to participate.

This good practice can be adopted by companies in all sectors, especially large enterprises.

Contacts/Further Information

Contacts

Karin Pardon

Project manager

http://www.bosch-presse.de

kontakt@bosch.de

+49 711 400 40990

Corporate Headquarters: +49 711 811-0

Further information

Bosch page on work-life balance

Bosch page on flexible work

Guidelines for a flexible and family-friendly working culture

Press release Bosch adds to its family-friendly working culture of 11 March 2013

Press release of 6 June 2013

Press release of the trade union IG-Metall of 18 July 2013

NB image copyright

Image from Bosch website: https://your.bosch-career.com/de/web/de/de/arbeiten_bosch/work_life_bala...

More good practices

EIGE's collection of good practices

EIGE's approach to good practices

Downloads

Family-friendliness as part of a diversity culture at Bosch - Germany
EN (PDF, 411.71 KB)

Metadata

Tool:
Self-regulation
  • In brief
  • Germany's most family-friendly enterprise
  • Leadership based on results
  • Diversity drives innovation
  • Enthusiastic take-up
  • Contacts/Further Information
  • More good practices
  • Downloads

Share:

Useful links

  • Who we are
  • Recruitment
  • News 
  • Events

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest EIGE's updates on a personalised basis. See all past newsletters.

General enquiries

  • EIGE's secretariat
  •  +370 5 215 7400
  • Contact form

Find us

image of map

Gedimino pr. 16, LT-01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

Media enquiries

  • Georgie Bradley
  •  +370 6 982 7826
  • georgie.bradley@eige.europa.eu

EIGE in social media

  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Youtube
  • Follow us on Linkedin
EIGE logo
Making equality between women and men a reality for all Europeans and beyond
 

© 2023 European Institute for Gender Equality

Help us improve

Take me to top

  • Web Accessibility
  • Legal notices
  • Personal Data Protection
  • Cookies Policy
  • The UK on EIGE's website
  • Contact us
  • Login